Effects of Grade III Traction-mobilization in End-range Joint Position in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

May 1, 2017 updated by: Maria Fortun Agud, Universidad de Zaragoza
Lower limb osteoarthritis is a major health problem in the westernized countries. The current gold standard treatment is joint replacement. However clinical guidelines recommend physical therapy as first option for these patients. Manual therapy has reported good reports in function, range of motion and pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The main aim of this study is to test the effects of a manual therapy protocol based on manual traction mobilization of the hip joint in an end range position and compare them with the effects achieve with the same protocol based on manual traction mobilization of the hip joint in a resting position. The investigators will use the caudal traction mobilization described by Kaltenborn. The study will test the effects of both treatments in passive range of motion, function and pain after three weeks of treatment, three weeks after finalizing the treatment and six weeks after.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Unidad de Investigación en Fisioterapia. Universidad de Zaragoza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hip osteoarthritis diagnosis
  • Diminished range of motion
  • Sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to Manual Therapy.
  • Sensitivity impairments in low back, pelvis, knee or foot regions.
  • Being involved in other physical therapy treatments
  • To change medication use during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Resting position mobilization group

This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in a resting position of the hip joint.

In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions.

Each subject is advice to do some exercises at home
Experimental: End range position mobilization group

This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in an end range position of the hip joint.

In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions.

Each subject is advice to do some exercises at home

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Passive Hip Range of Motion after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes from Baseline in Functional Tests (TUG, fast-paced walk test, stair climb test, 30sec. chair stand test), after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Scale after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
Change from Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale after intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 9 weeks
3 weeks, 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI13/0030

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Hip

Clinical Trials on Manual caudal traction mobilization in resting position

Subscribe