Efficacy Study of the Music Glove Patients With Spinal Cord Injuries

June 4, 2021 updated by: Kelli Sharp, University of California, Irvine

To Determine the Therapeutic Effect of the Music Glove and Conventional Hand Exercises

Investigators are trying to determine the therapeutic effect of the music glove and conventional hand exercise program to patients with spinal cord injuries. All participants will be randomized into two groups: AB and BA. They will all exercise at least 3 times a week for 3 weeks with minimum of 3 hours of exercise time per week. Participants will receive the other intervention at their 3 week post-therapy follow-up visits. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline 1 and 2 (3 to 10 days apart), post-therapy after the first intervention, 3-week post-therapy follow up, post-therapy after the second intervention, and 3-week post-second intervention follow up visits.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • University of California, Irvine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of spinal cord injury affecting the arm and hand functions, at least 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Upper extremity weakness as measured on a standard clinical scale
  • No active major psychiatric problems, or neurological/orthopedic problems affecting the training upper extremity
  • No active major neurological disease other than the spinal cord injury
  • Absence of pain in the affected upper extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe tone at the affected upper extremity as measured on a standard clinical scale
  • Severe sensory/proprioception deficit at the affected upper extremity as measured on a standard clinical scale
  • Difficulty in understanding or complying with instructions given by the experimenter
  • Inability to perform the experimental task that will be studied
  • Increased pain with movement of the training upper extremity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Music Glove
Music Glove is a glove with sensors attached to the tips of all 5 fingers. The glove is connected to a software musical program like guitar hero. Participants will follow the rhythm or musical notes of the songs and move their fingers accordingly. Participants are reinforced with biofeedback that includes visual and auditory cues when the correct sequences are achieved.
Participants will exercise at home using the music glove for 3 times a week for 3 weeks with a minimum of 3 hours per week.
Active Comparator: Conventional Hand Exercise Program
Conventional Hand Exercise Program includes range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, coordinating exercises of the hand and fingers. This exercise program is designed by an occupational therapist and is a general exercise program that a stroke patient will receive when he/she is being discharged from the hospital.
Participants will exercise at home using the hand exercise program designed by an occupational therapist for 3 times a week for 3 weeks with a minimum of 3 hours per week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Box and Blocks Test
Time Frame: Baseline, EOT 1st Intervention, 1 month post 1 intervention, EOT 2nd Intervention, and 1 month post 2nd Intervention.
We compared the change of Box and Blocks Test (BBT) scores from baseline evaluation to the end of 3-week of therapy, and from 1-month post first intervention to the end of the second 3-week therapy. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, EOT 1st Intervention, 1 month post 1 intervention, EOT 2nd Intervention, and 1 month post 2nd Intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: Baseline, EOT 1st Intervention, 1 month post 1 intervention, EOT 2nd Intervention, and 1 month post 2nd Intervention.
We used the GRASSP to capture information on upper limb impairment from the SCI population through three domains: Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension. We focused on the Prehension section of the test. The prehension ability domain consists of three different tasks 1) Cylindrical Grasp, 2) Lateral Key Pinch, & 3) Tip to Tip Pinch and one can score 0-4 for each task for a total of 12 points for this section. The prehension performance domain consists of 1) pour water from a bottle, 2) open jars, 3) pick up & turn a key, 4) transfer 9 pegs board to board, 5) pick up 4 coins & place in the slot, 6) screw 4 nuts onto bolts and one can score 0-5 for each task for a total of 30 points. The score for each domain of the prehension test is totaled for each of the upper extremities with ranges from 0 to 42. The higher scores indicate better functional outcomes.
Baseline, EOT 1st Intervention, 1 month post 1 intervention, EOT 2nd Intervention, and 1 month post 2nd Intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelli Sharp, DPT, University of California, Irvine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2R44HD074331-02 [2008-6432]
  • 2R44HD074331-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Music Glove

Subscribe