Phototherapy Applied in Association With Strength Training

February 2, 2016 updated by: Adriane Aver Vanin, University of Nove de Julho

Phototherapy Applied in Association of Muscle Training: Evaluation of Different Irradiation Protocols

The effects of phototherapy has been widely studied by some research groups. The investigators know that there are positive results with light application to improve muscle performance and delay fatigue. However, there are few studies showing its´ effects on muscular training. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of phototherapy applied at different times during 12 weeks of strength training. For such, 48 volunteers, healthy male, from 18 to 35 years old were recruited to perform a strength training protocol for the anterior muscle of the thigh development. Volunteers performed the training protocol twice a week for 12 weeks. There were assessed isometric peak torque in isokinetic dynamometer, 1-repetition maximum test in the leg extension and leg press machines and bilateral thigh perimetry.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a clinical, randomized, controlled placebo and double-blind study. Forty-eight participants performed strength training protocol. Subjects practiced a protocol training with 80% of the load, measured through 1-repetition maximum test. The training protocol consisted in performing 5 sets of 10 repetitions, twice a week, employing leg extension and leg press machines.

Phototherapy, active or placebo, were applied in 6 different points of anterior muscle of the thigh before and after each training session. Only one investigator, that did not participate in any phase of the assessments and trainings sessions, knew about what program is active or placebo in phototherapy device. Randomisation carried out by a simple drawing of lots (A, B, C, or D) in the first visit. The phototherapy unit emitted the same sound regardless of the program used, active or placebo. Either strength training lasted 12 weeks and assessments were performed at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. There were evaluated maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), bilateral thigh perimetry and 1-repetition maximum test (1-RM).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01504-001
        • Nove de Julho University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

There were included in the study

  • healthy individuals,
  • active,
  • aged between 18 and 35 years old,
  • male,
  • presenting no history of musculoskeletal injury in the regions of the hip and knee in the two months prior to the study.
  • that are not making use of pharmacological agents and / or nutritional supplements, and
  • that have at least 80% of attendance to training.

Exclusion Criteria:

The participants were excluded if they

  • present some musculoskeletal injury during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A - Active or Placebo Phototherapy

The phototherapy was divided in program 1 and program 2. One of these programs consisted in active phototherapy and the other placebo.

The subjects allocated in group A, received program 1 before strength training, and the same program 1 after training.

Participants performed a strength training. Forty-eight subjects practiced a training protocol with 80% of the load, measured through 1-repetition maximum test. The strength training lasted 12 weeks and the evaluations were done monthly. Phototherapy, active or placebo, were applied in 6 different points of quadriceps muscle depending the group randomized, before and after each training session.
Other Names:
  • MR4 device - device that combines super-pulsed lasers, and red and infrared LEDs (Multi Radiance Medical, Solon, OH, USA)
Experimental: Group B - Active or Placebo Phototherapy

The phototherapy was divided in program 1 and program 2. One of these programs consisted in active phototherapy and the other placebo.

The subjects allocated in group B, received program 1 before strength training, and program 2 after training.

Participants performed a strength training. Forty-eight subjects practiced a training protocol with 80% of the load, measured through 1-repetition maximum test. The strength training lasted 12 weeks and the evaluations were done monthly. Phototherapy, active or placebo, were applied in 6 different points of quadriceps muscle depending the group randomized, before and after each training session.
Other Names:
  • MR4 device - device that combines super-pulsed lasers, and red and infrared LEDs (Multi Radiance Medical, Solon, OH, USA)
Experimental: Group C - Active or Placebo Phototherapy

The phototherapy was divided in program 1 and program 2. One of these programs consisted in active phototherapy and the other placebo.

The subjects allocated in group C, received program 2 before strength training, and program 1 after training.

Participants performed a strength training. Forty-eight subjects practiced a training protocol with 80% of the load, measured through 1-repetition maximum test. The strength training lasted 12 weeks and the evaluations were done monthly. Phototherapy, active or placebo, were applied in 6 different points of quadriceps muscle depending the group randomized, before and after each training session.
Other Names:
  • MR4 device - device that combines super-pulsed lasers, and red and infrared LEDs (Multi Radiance Medical, Solon, OH, USA)
Experimental: Group D - Active or Placebo Phototherapy'

The phototherapy was divided in program 1 and program 2. One of these programs consisted in active phototherapy and the other placebo.

The subjects allocated in group B, received program 2 before strength training, and the same program 2 after training.

Participants performed a strength training. Forty-eight subjects practiced a training protocol with 80% of the load, measured through 1-repetition maximum test. The strength training lasted 12 weeks and the evaluations were done monthly. Phototherapy, active or placebo, were applied in 6 different points of quadriceps muscle depending the group randomized, before and after each training session.
Other Names:
  • MR4 device - device that combines super-pulsed lasers, and red and infrared LEDs (Multi Radiance Medical, Solon, OH, USA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum voluntary contraction in the isokinetic dynamometer (MVC)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Functional performance measure
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-Repetition Maximum test in the leg press and leg extension machines (1-RM)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Functional performance measure
12 weeks
Thigh perimetry
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ernesto Cesar P Leal Junior, PhD, University of Nove de Julho

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Nove de Julho University
  • 2013/19355-3 (Other Grant/Funding Number: FAPESP-Brazil)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Development in Association to Phototherapy

Clinical Trials on Active or Placebo Phototherapy (MR4)

Subscribe