Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents (BIONYX)

February 2, 2017 updated by: Clemens von Birgelen, Thorax Centrum Twente

Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents (BIONYX): A Randomized Trial With Stent Evaluation in All-comers IV (TWENTE IV)

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.

Aim:

The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of the bioresorbable polymer coated stent (ORSIRO) and a new generation permanent polymer coated stent (RESOLUTE ONYX) in an all-comers patient population and non-inferiority setting.

Study design:

The study is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicentre trial with 1:1 randomization for drug-eluting stent type, stratified for gender and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

Study population:

Patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. A total of 2,470 patients will be included.

Intervention:

One group will receive the ORSIRO stent, the other group will receive the RESOLUTE ONYX stent. All other intervention and procedural characteristics are similar.

Primary study outcome:

Incidence of target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year follow-up (according to ARC definitions). Components of the primary endpoint in hierarchical order: - Cardiac death: all deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. - Target vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) that is Q-wave or non-Q-wave, that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel. - Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2470

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Charleroi, Belgium
        • Chu Charleroi
      • Hasselt, Belgium
        • Jessa Ziekenhuis
      • Haifa, Israel
        • Rambam
      • Arnhem, Netherlands
        • Rijnstate Hospital
      • Emmen, Netherlands
        • TREANT Zorggroep
      • Enschede, Netherlands
        • Medisch Spectrum Twente
    • Zuid Holland
      • Den Haag, Zuid Holland, Netherlands, 2504 LN
        • Haga ziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of 18 years and older, requiring PCI for the treatment of significant coronary artery or bypass graft lesions, being eligible for treatment with drug eluting stents according to clinical guidelines and/or the operators' judgement, and capable of providing informed consent.
  • Patients with all clinical syndromes will be enrolled without any exclusion based on number, type, location or length of lesions to be treated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known intolerance to components of one of the study DES, or known intolerance to antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy that prevents adherence to any dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT).
  • Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of DAPT during the first 3 months after randomization.
  • Participation in another randomized cardiovascular device trial or randomized pharmacological study related to antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy before reaching the primary endpoint.
  • Known pregnancy, adherence to scheduled follow-up is unlikely, or life expectancy is assumed to be less than 1 year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Orsiro DES (Biotronik)
The ORSIRO hybrid coating DES (Biotronik, Switzerland) is a device which includes a modern, highly flexible, thin-strut stent platform, eluting sirolimus from a thin biodegradable BIO-lute coating grom PLLA (poly(L-lactic acid)) which is located mainly on the abluminal side.
stents will be implanted in case of significant coronary artery disease
Other Names:
  • Orsiro drug eluting stent
Active Comparator: RESOLUTE ONYX DES (Medtronic)
The RESOLUTE ONYX is a permanent polymer DES that uses a novel highly flexible metallic stent backbone with increased radiographic visibility eluting the drug zotarolimus from the BioLinx durable polymer coating. The stent platform uses corewire technology that allows the stent to have a denser core metal surrounded by outer layer of cobalt-chromium.
stents will be implanted in case of significant coronary artery disease based on coronary angiography
Other Names:
  • Resolute Onyx drug eluting stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target vessel failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 1 year
Composite endpoint consisting of: Cardiac death (All deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established); Target vessel related MI (Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel); Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of CABG or PCI.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year
Death distinguished into: cardiac, vascular, other causes, all-cause mortality
1 and 2 year
Myocardial infarction at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year
Myocardial infarction distinguished into Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
1 and 2 year
Revascularization at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year
Target-vessel revascularization distinguished into PCI or CABG
1 and 2 year
Stent thrombosis at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year
Stent thrombosis was distinguished into definite, probable and possible according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition.
1 and 2 year
Target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year
Composite endpoint consisting of : cardiac death; target vessel-related MI; clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)
1 and 2 year
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up

Composite endpoint consisting of:

  1. any death;
  2. any myocardial infarction
  3. emergent CABG;
  4. clinically indicated TLR
1 and 2 year follow-up
Patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of: any death; any myocardial infarction; any revascularization.
1 and 2 year follow-up
Major Bleeding at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
Major bleeding that require surgery or blood transfusions or cerebral hemorrhages
1 and 2 year follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) and deliverability
Time Frame: 1 year
Identification of deformation of a stent in the longitudinal axis during coronary angiographic assessment.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clemens von Birgelen, MD, PhD, Thorax Centrum Twente

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Orsiro

3
Subscribe