Identification of a Biomarker Associated With Cis-duplication of the SMN1 Gene (BADGES)

July 23, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

Identification of a Biomarker Associated With Cis-duplication of the SMN1 Gene Aiming at Improving the Genetic Counseling in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Families

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder characterized by loss of motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord and leading to muscle atrophy. SMA has an autosomal recessive inheritance and affects 1 in 6000 infants with a carrier frequency of 1 in 40. In most cases, it is caused by homozygous gene deletion or gene conversion of the SMN1 gene (0+0 genotype) on 5q11-q13. This genomic region has been duplicated and inverted during evolution. Thus the SMN1 gene has a very homologous copy, called SMN2. Genetic counseling aim at detecting carriers with only one copy of the SMN1 gene (0+1 genotype). SMA carrier testing relies on total copy number quantification of the SMN1 copies by quantitative PCR methods. Nevertheless, cis-duplication of the SMN1 gene on one allele and deletion on the second allele (2+0 genotype) can lead to a misinterpretation as molecular methods show 2 copies of the SMN1 gene and cannot detect the carrier status.

The aim of the study is the characterization of a biomarker specific of the cis-duplication of the SMN1 gene in order to allow the detection of this 2+0 genotype which constitutes a trap for genetic counseling. We will use molecular combing to identify a genomic morse code (GMC) composed of a combination of probes specific of a structural motif on the cis-duplication chromosome. The characterization of this GMC is based on the comparison of two sample groups:

  • The test group, with a maximum of 137 individuals carrying 3 copies of the SMN1 gene (suggesting a cis-duplication on one allele)
  • The control-1 group, with a maximum of 137 individuals carrying 2 copies of the SMN1 gene

A pilot study performed on 24 samples in the two groups is needed to define the exact sample number necessary for statistical analysis of the study. When the GMC will be characterized, its specificity will be evaluated by testing two sample groups:

  • The test group, with 37 individuals carrying 3 copies of the SMN1 gene
  • The control-2 group, with 37 individuals carrying 3 copies of the SMN2 gene Molecular combing needs long DNA fibers and usual methods for DNA extraction are not appropriate. This project requires new blood samples for specific DNA extraction.

If this project is successful, during a second project, this GMC will be converted into a simple and cheap PCR-based method. We will then evaluate the sensitivity of this method on our sample collection, notably on individuals with the 2+0 genotype defined by familial genotyping.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France
        • Nantes University Hospital
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Rouen University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult individual
  • Individual with either 2 copies of the SMN1 gene (control-1 group), 3 copies of the SMN1 gene (test group), or 3 copies of the SMN2 gene (control-2 group).
  • Individual with a social insurance
  • Signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women, nursing women
  • Individual without freedom by administrative decision or judicial decision or individual under administrative supervision or legal guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subject carrying 3 copies of the SMN1 gene
Using blood sampling, use of molecular combing to identify a genomic morse code (GMC) composed of a combination of probes specific of a structural motif on the cis-duplication chromosome.
A blood sample will be taken on subject carrying specific genotype
Other: Subject carrying 2 copies of the SMN1 gene
Using blood sampling, use of molecular combing to identify a genomic morse code (GMC) composed of a combination of probes specific of a structural motif on the cis-duplication chromosome.
A blood sample will be taken on subject carrying specific genotype
Other: Subject carrying 3 copies of the SMN2 gene
Using blood sampling, use of molecular combing to identify a genomic morse code (GMC) composed of a combination of probes specific of a structural motif on the cis-duplication chromosome.
A blood sample will be taken on subject carrying specific genotype

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Identification of a genetic signature indicating the presence of one allele with 2 copies in cis of the SMN1 gene.
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of a genetic signature
Time Frame: Day 1
Specificity of a genetic signature will be done using analysis of individual carrying either 3 copies of the SMN1 gene or 3 copies of the SMN2 gene
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thierry FREBOURG, MD, Rouen University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 4, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 4, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Clinical Trials on blood sampling

Subscribe