The Role of Echocardiographic Contrast (Optison) in Enhancing Tricuspid Regurgitation Spectral Doppler Signals

January 20, 2016 updated by: Northwell Health

The Role of Echocardiographic Contrast (Optison) in Enhancing Tricuspid Regurgitation Spectral Doppler Signals to Assess Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressures. Correlation With Invasive Measurements Obtained by Right Heart Catheterization

The investigators aim to correlate noninvasive pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) measurements obtained with and without echocardiographic contrast (Optison) during transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with those obtained invasively and simultaneously during right heart catheterization, as the gold standard.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

In the United States, pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is an increasingly recognized cause of morbidity and mortality.

Echocardiography, due to its widespread use, versatility, portability, noninvasive nature, and safety, is routinely used as the primary method for diagnosis and evaluation of these patients. However, in this very cohort, its accuracy is frequently compromised by poor acoustic windows. The use of echocardiographic contrast (EC) in such patients may increase diagnostic accuracy, eliminate the need for performing more invasive, time-consuming, and expensive tests, and eliminate potential diagnostic and management errors.

Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is routinely measured noninvasively with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by obtaining the tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) with continuous wave spectral Doppler and applying the modified Bernoulli equation.

The investigators aim to use the FDA approved perflutren-based EC agent Optison to augment inadequate TR CW spectral Doppler envelopes and determine if the TRV and PASP measurements obtained with the use of Optison correlate better with the invasive measurements obtained simultaneously during right heart catheterization as opposed to those measurements obtained without the use of EC.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • North Shore - LIJ Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

After obtaining informed written consent, investigators will enroll all consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 years old) undergoing right heart catheterization in the catheterization laboratory for various clinical indications as part of routine medical care.

This will be a prospective and multicenter study. The participating institutions are: North Shore University Hospital (Manhasset, NY), Long Island Jewish Medical Center (New Hyde Park, NY), and Mt Sinai Medical Center (NY, NY).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 years old) undergoing right heart catheterization catheterization laboratory for various clinical indications as part of routine medical care;
  • only patients with poor acoustic windows will be included (based on previous studies, body habitus);

Exclusion Criteria:

  • atrial fibrillation or other irregular rhythms (bigeminy, frequent ectopy)
  • pregnant women
  • known allergy to perflutren, blood products, albumin
  • patients who cannot receive blood products due to religious beliefs
  • evidence of intracardiac right to left shunting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Noninvasively derived PASP values in patients with versus without Optison enhanced TR continuous wave (CW) spectral Doppler envelopes in patients with technically inadequate studies to PASP measurements obtained invasively and simultaneously
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous wave PASP Doppler Envelope measurements in patients receiving Optison versus conventional non-perflutren based agents (10% air-90% saline mixture).
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Compare the diagnostic role of Optison versus conventional non-perflutren based agents (10% air-90% saline mixture) in enhancing inadequate TR continuous wave spectral Doppler envelopes. This will be done by measuring the values obtained from echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamics with respect to PASP.
up to 6 months
Invasive hemodynamic values in patients who undergo perflutren based EC (Optison) administration on PASP values in patients with normal or elevated PASP.
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Number of patients with adverse events as a measure of safety
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension, Pulmonary

Subscribe