- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02565043
The Clinical Efficacy of RENASYS TOUCH NPWT System in the Management of Acute, Sub-acute and Chronic Wounds (NPWT)
A Prospective, Open, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate Clinical Efficacy, Functionality and Device Performance of a New Portable Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (RENASYS TOUCH) in the Management of Acute, Sub-acute and Chronic Wounds
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will comprise a prospective, open-labeled, multi-center study to assess the clinical efficacy, functionality and device performance of the new portable negative pressure wound therapy system in the management of acute, sub-acute and chronic wounds.
The patient's reference wound will be randomized to treatment with either intermittent or continuous NPWT mode to ensure minimum numbers in each group for analysis.
The primary objective of the study is to determine the time (days) to achieve the point where the reference wound is ready to be closed either by surgical intervention (STSG, simple flap or suturing) or by secondary intention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cape Town
-
Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa, 7530
- Tiervlei Trail Centre
-
Claremont, Cape Town, South Africa, 7708
- Dr Matley & Partners
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient is able to understand the study and is willing to consent to the study
- The patient consents to the on-going use of their de-identified photos by the Sponsor for purposes outside of this study
- Patients must be at least 18 years old
- Males and females. If female, they must not be pregnant. If female and of reproductive age, a pregnancy test will be provided
- Patient must have an acute, sub-acute or chronic wound that would benefit from the application of topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
- Patients must have an acute or sub-acute wound requiring wound bed preparation for an expected minimum of 4 days in advance of either planned surgical closure (including delayed primary closure, flaps or grafts) or planned secondary closure, OR a chronic wound requiring wound bed preparation in advance of planned surgical closure (not secondary intention)
- The patient, or the patient's legal representative, if the patient is incapable of giving legal consent, is able to understand the trial and is willing to consent to the trial
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a known history of poor compliance with medical treatment.
- Patients who have participated in this study previously and who [healed or] were withdrawn.
- Patients who are unable to understand the aims and objectives of the study.
- Presence of necrotic tissue, or >25% slough in the reference wound bed. Once debridement has taken place, treatment with the investigational product may proceed
- Patients whose reference wound displays evidence of extensive tunnelling or sinus tracts
- Previously confirmed and untreated osteomyelitis
- Malignancy in the reference wound
- Non-enteric and unexplored Fistulas
- Presence of untreated infection in the reference wound bed (Infection must be treated with systemic antibiotics to permit inclusion in the trial and can be administered concurrently during the trial treatment regime)
- Active bleeding. Once haemostasis has been achieved, treatment with the investigational product may proceed
- Exposure of blood vessels or organs at the base of the reference wound
- Patients with a known history of poor compliance with medical treatment
- Patients who have participated in this trial previously and who healed or were withdrawn
- Patients treated on an out-patient basis who cannot continue to be treated as out-patients and/or attend the clinic for dressing changes as detailed in the treatment regimen of the study protocol
- Patients whose wounds are not suitable for treatment with intermittent therapy mode (e.g. highly exuding wounds, wounds with tunnels or undermining, wounds in difficult areas where maintaining a seal is problematic, patients who experience severe pain during intermittent therapy)
- Patients who are employees of Smith & Nephew group companies.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: RENASYS TOUCH Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device
Active Device: "RENASYS TOUCH NPWT" device administered to all patients using the intermittent/variable therapy mode, for up to 28 days of therapy.
|
RENASYS TOUCH NPWT System was administered to all participants.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: RENASYS TOUCH Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Active Device: "RENASYS TOUCH NPWT" device administered to all patients using the continuous therapy mode for up to 28 days of therapy.
|
RENASYS TOUCH NPWT System was administered to all participants.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The time to achieve the point where the reference wound is ready to be closed either by surgical intervention (STSG, simple flap or suturing) or by secondary intention
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine the percentage of wounds that are ready to be closed either by surgical intervention (STSG, simple flap or suturing) or by secondary intention
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days
|
|
|
To assess the percentage of wounds that are ready to be closed either by surgical intervention (STSG, simple flap or suturing) or by secondary intention, in wounds that are randomized to intermittent or continuous therapy mode
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days
|
|
|
The percentage change in wound area
Time Frame: 28 days
|
To assess progress towards wound closure using the percentage change in wound area (cm2)
|
28 days
|
|
The number of patients with a confirmed clinical infection or presenting with clinical signs of infection
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Patients that have a confirmed clinical infection or the number of patients that present with clinical signs of infection in their reference wound
|
28 days
|
|
The number of patients with the condition of their surrounding skin recorded as either Healthy, Fragile, Inflamed, Macerated, Dry and Flaky, or Other
Time Frame: 28 days
|
To assess the condition of the patients surrounding skin
|
28 days
|
|
To record the patients level of pain using a 10-point pain scale, on application and during therapy, in patient's wounds that are randomised to intermittent or continuous therapy mode
Time Frame: 28 days
|
To assess the patients level of pain on application and during therapy
|
28 days
|
|
The study will monitor safety in use and will record and assess all adverse events that occur during the study
Time Frame: 28 days
|
28 days
|
|
|
The percentage change in wound volume
Time Frame: 28 days
|
To assess progress towards wound closure using the percentage change in wound area (cm3)
|
28 days
|
|
The percentage change in wound depth
Time Frame: 28 days
|
To assess progress towards wound closure using the percentage change in wound depth (mm)
|
28 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martin Forlee, MD, Dr Matley & Partners
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):553-62. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199706000-00001.
- Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):563-76; discussion 577.
- Krug E, Berg L, Lee C, Hudson D, Birke-Sorensen H, Depoorter M, Dunn R, Jeffery S, Duteille F, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Dowsett C, Ferreira F, Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Vig S, Runkel N, Martin R, Smith J; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP]. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury. 2011 Feb;42 Suppl 1:S1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)00041-6.
- Birke-Sorensen H, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Hudson D, Krug E, Berg L, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Depoorter M, Dowsett C, Dunn R, Duteille F, Ferreira F, Francos Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Jeffery S, Lee C, Vig S, Runkel N; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP], Martin R, Smith J. Evidence-based recommendations for negative pressure wound therapy: treatment variables (pressure levels, wound filler and contact layer)--steps towards an international consensus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Sep;64 Suppl:S1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
- Vig S, Dowsett C, Berg L, Caravaggi C, Rome P, Birke-Sorensen H, Bruhin A, Chariker M, Depoorter M, Dunn R, Duteille F, Ferreira F, Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Hudson D, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Jeffery S, Krug E, Lee C, Malmsjo M, Runkel N; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP], Martin R, Smith J. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in chronic wounds: steps towards an international consensus. J Tissue Viability. 2011 Dec;20 Suppl 1:S1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
- Hudson DA, Adams KG, Van Huyssteen A, Martin R, Huddleston EM. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015 Apr;12(2):195-201. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12080. Epub 2013 May 7.
- Clare MP, Fitzgibbons TC, McMullen ST, Stice RC, Hayes DF, Henkel L. Experience with the vacuum assisted closure negative pressure technique in the treatment of non-healing diabetic and dysvascular wounds. Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Oct;23(10):896-901. doi: 10.1177/107110070202301002.
- Mendonca DA, Cosker T, Makwana NK. Vacuum-assisted closure to aid wound healing in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Sep;26(9):761-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600915.
- McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, Cunningham MW, McCulloch JM, Farinas LP. Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Aug;46(8):28-32, 34.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CT13/01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Dehiscence
-
St. Borbala HospitalSemmelweis University; Department of Surgery, Jahn Ferend Dél-Pesti Kórház... and other collaboratorsTerminatedSurgical Wound | Surgical Site Infection | Wound Dehiscence, Surgical | Dehiscence of Internal Surgical WoundHungary
-
SeraffixTerminatedDehiscence, Surgical WoundIsrael
-
SeraffixCompletedDehiscence, Surgical WoundIsrael
-
RedDress Ltd.RecruitingDehiscence WoundIsrael
-
King Edward Medical UniversityMayo Hospital LahoreRecruiting
-
ConvaTec Inc.WithdrawnSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related Wound | Dehiscence Wound | Surgical Wound LeakUnited States
-
French Medical Institute for Mothers and ChildrenCompletedWound Dehiscence | IncisionAfghanistan
-
Molnlycke Health Care ABSyntactxNot yet recruitingSurgical Wound | Surgical Incision | Surgical Wound Dehiscence | Incision, Surgical | Surgical Wound, Recent
-
University of California, San FranciscoTerminatedPostoperative Complications | Surgical Wound Infection | Surgical Wound DehiscenceUnited States
-
Menoufia UniversityCompletedCesarean Section | Wound Dehiscence
Clinical Trials on RENASYS TOUCH Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.WithdrawnAbdomenal Wound TraumaUnited States
-
Yale UniversitySmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedWound Infection | Seroma | Wound DehiscenceUnited States
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
ConvaTec Inc.WithdrawnSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related Wound | Dehiscence Wound | Surgical Wound LeakUnited States
-
Progenerative Medical, IncRecruiting
-
KCI USA, IncCompletedDiabetic Foot UlcersUnited States
-
Sindh Institute of Urology and TransplantationCompletedSurgical Site Infection | Wound Heal | Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy | Stoma Site InfectionPakistan
-
DeRoyal Industries, Inc.Lincoln Memorial UniversityCompletedSkin Sensitisation | Skin Reaction to Mechanical, Thermal and Radiation StimuliUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemWithdrawnSurgical Site Infection | Groin InfectionsUnited States
-
Region SkaneRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Surgical Wound Infection | Skin Cancer | Wound Healing | Bandages | Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy | Skin Grafting | Lower Extremity | Skin Transplantation | Split Thickness Skin Graft | Skin Tumour | LegSweden