Preventing the Loss of Muscle and Function in Hospitalized Older Adults

April 15, 2019 updated by: Micah Drummond, University of Utah
One third of independent older adults over the age of 65y will be hospitalized for an acute medical illness, injury, or operative procedure. Unfortunately, 50% of these older adults will experience functional decline during their hospital stay from the amount of time they are physically inactive and in bed. Following discharge, the functional deficits can persist for months and in many instances never return to pre-hospitalization levels thus compounding morbidity, health care costs and dying. A classic consequence of short-term bed rest in older adults is the significant loss in skeletal muscle mass which underlies the accelerated leg strength deficits. The investigator has shown that an important mechanism of skeletal muscle loss is the inability of nutrients to stimulate a normal muscle protein synthesis response; a process highly regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway (mTOR) and amino acid transporters. Day to day maintenance of force generating muscle tissue is dictated by anabolic stimulation from muscle contraction and essential amino acid ingestion. Therefore, anabolic interventions such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and high quality protein supplementation that contains a high proportion of essential amino acids (whey protein) may be promising approach to maintain leg muscle mass and strength in hospitalized older adults and prevent the long term consequences of repeated periods of short-term physical inactivity. The purpose of this study is to test in older adults if the combination of NMES and protein supplementation is capable of preserving muscle mass and strength and maintaining muscle nutrient anabolic sensitivity during bed rest. The investigators current hypotheses are that daily NMES and protein supplementation during 5-days of bed rest in older adults will: 1) preserve lower extremity muscle mass and strength and 2) maintain muscle nutrient anabolic sensitivity as measured by mTOR signaling and amino acid transporter expression. The long term goal is to utilize this inpatient preventative therapeutic approach in a clinical setting in which muscle mass and strength deficits are profound (e.g., intensive care patients).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A majority of older adults experience repeated periods of physical inactivity during acute illnesses, injuries or after an operative procedure. Following discharge from the hospital, daily activities are adversely impacted. Infirmity follows repeated periods of inactivity (termed "catabolic hits") that can occur over an older adults' lifespan and lead to a downward spiral of potentially irrecoverable deficits in physical function resulting in increased health care costs, loss of independence, and premature death. The hallmark sign of short-term physical inactivity in older adults is the rapid deterioration of skeletal muscle mass and strength. Understandably, little attention is placed on physical function during these requisite periods of inactivity as the medical management and/or postoperative recuperation is the focus. However, the muscle deficits that follow as a result of acute hospitalization can have profound long-term consequences.

Muscle contraction and essential amino acids are powerful independent anabolic stimuli and fundamental to maintain skeletal muscle mass and strength. The primary mechanism of disuse atrophy during short-term bed rest in older adults is the reduced acute nutrient stimulation of muscle protein synthesis regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway and amino acid transporter expression (i.e., LAT1). Intervening with essential amino acid supplements can maintain some muscle function in older adults during bed rest, but it does not preserve muscle mass. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a muscle intervention is also feasible, but alone is not a panacea. NMES has recently been shown to acutely stimulate protein synthesis in ambulatory older adults with diabetes and attenuate some loss in muscle mass in critically ill patients. The investigator suggests that, together, daily NMES, and a high quality protein source of EAAs (PRO), can be a potent two-pronged approach to preserve the loss of muscle and strength in older adults confined to short-term bed rest. The goal is to test if the combination of NMES and PRO will maintain muscle mass, strength, nutrient-induced mTOR signaling and amino acid transporter expression in older adults during bed rest. The central hypothesis for this project which will support this next step is that a daily combination of NMES and PRO in older adults experiencing bed rest will preserve: 1) leg muscle mass and knee extensor strength and 2) muscle anabolic sensitivity in response to acute nutrient ingestion, as measured by mTOR signaling and LAT1 expression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age between 60-85 yrs Ability to sign informed consent Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) exam score ≥26 Free-living, prior to admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiac abnormalities considered exclusionary by the study physician (e.g., CHF, CAD, right-to-left shunt)
  2. Uncontrolled endocrine or metabolic disease (e.g., hypo/hyperthyroidism, diabetes)
  3. GFR <65 mL/min/1.73m2 or evidence of kidney disease or failure
  4. Vascular disease or risk factors of peripheral atherosclerosis. (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia > 250 mg/dl, claudication or evidence of venous or arterial insufficiency upon palpitation of femoral, popliteal and pedal arteries)
  5. Risk of DVT including family history of thrombophilia, DVT, pulmonary emboli, myeloproliferative diseases including polycythemia (Hb>18 g/dL) or thrombocytosis (platelets>400x103/mL), and connective tissue diseases (positive lupus anticoagulant), hyperhomocysteinemia, deficiencies of factor V Leiden, proteins S and C, and antithrombin III
  6. Use of anticoagulant therapy (e.g., Coumadin, heparin)
  7. Elevated systolic pressure >150 or a diastolic blood pressure > 100
  8. Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemakers, electronic infusion pumps, stimulators)
  9. Cancer or history of successfully treated cancer (less than 1 year) other than basal cell carcinoma
  10. Currently on a weight-loss diet or body mass index > 30 kg/m2
  11. Inability to abstain from smoking for duration of study
  12. A history of > 20 pack per year smoking
  13. HIV or hepatitis B or C*
  14. Recent anabolic or corticosteroids use (within 3 months)
  15. Subjects with hemoglobin or hematocrit lower than accepted lab values
  16. Agitation/aggression disorder (by psychiatric history and exam)
  17. History of stroke with motor disability
  18. A recent history (<12 months) of GI bleed
  19. Depression [>5 on the 15 items Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)]
  20. Alcohol or drug abuse
  21. Exercise training (>1 session of moderate to high intensity aerobic or resistance exercise/week)
  22. Liver disease (AST/ALT 2 times above the normal limit, hyperbilirubinemia)
  23. Respiratory disease (acute upper respiratory infection, history of chronic lung disease with resting oxygen saturation <97% on room air)
  24. Any other condition or event considered exclusionary by the PI and faculty physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control
Participants will complete bed rest but will receive a non-protein placebo supplement
supplement will be used as a placebo to control participants. The supplement will be provided 3x a day during bed rest.
Experimental: NMES + PRO
Participants will receive daily treatment with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and daily supplements of a protein drink.
device is used to stimulate muscle contraction in the legs of the patient. The intervention will be used 3 times a day during bed rest.
supplement will used to enhance muscle anabolism. The intervention will be provided 3 times a day during bed rest.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Percent Change in Bilateral Thigh Lean Mass Density (Grams) as Measured by DEXA Scan Will be Compared Between Baseline and After 5-days of Bed Rest
Time Frame: Baseline and after 5-days of Bed rest
Thigh lean mass (grams) will be measured by DEXA scan at baseline and after 5-days of bed rest. The change in thigh lean mass will be calculated between these two time points. This outcome will be measured for the Control and the NMES + PRO groups.
Baseline and after 5-days of Bed rest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Micah Drummond, PhD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe