Guideline vs Usual Treatment in Schizophrenic Adolescents (ACER)

February 17, 2016 updated by: Rosa E. Ulloa, Hospital Psiquiatrico Infantil Dr. Juan N. Navarro, Mexico

Comparative Study of Recommended Treatment for Schizophrenia Guideline Treatment vs Treatment as Usual in Child Psychiatric Hospital: Effect on Adherence, Efficacy on Symptoms, and Global Function

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability and usefulness of the guideline treatment for diagnosis and treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia, also to evaluate the compliance to the treatment according to the guidelines, and to compare the treatment compliance, severity of illness and social functioning of patients treated according to guideline treatment vs patients with the treatment as usual on a six month follow up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The drug treatment of patients on the Guideline Treatment group followed an algorithm, where an atypical antipsychotic must be maintained during 6 weeks before the evaluation of medication change if the PANSS score did not show a reduction of 30% and the patients did not show functional improvement. Clozapine could be administered if two trials of antipsychotics were not effective. Benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anticholinergics or anticonvulsants were allowed for the treatment of comorbid disorders or side effects.

The psychosocial treatment included psychoeducation (three 90 min sessions with the family and two 45 min sessions with the patients), followed by a seven 45 min sessions training on social skills which focused on verbal and non-verbal communication, as well as in conversation skills. Patients were also trained in healthy life style habits and were included on a 30 min of exercise in group.

TAU included an antipsychotic and the psychosocial treatment decided by the clinician

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Total score ≥ 70 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and a score of at least 4 (moderate) on 3 of the follow core items (conceptual disorganization , hallucinatory behavior, suspiciousness, and unusual thought content).
  • Patients were required to have a score of ≥ 4 symptoms on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-S)
  • Had not received antipsychotic in proper doses/ a regular antipsychotic treatment for at least 4 weeks previous enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable medical conditions
  • Their diagnosis changed during the study
  • Had a history of substance dependence or substance use (except cannabis), -Females with pregnancy
  • Refusal to practice contraception during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1 Guideline treatment
Participants will receive the Guideline Treatment (risperidone, administered orally) plus Behavioral Intervention: "psychosocial treatment" included "psychoeducation" "social skills" "healthy life style habits" "exercise in group"
Participants will receive the Guideline Treatment (risperidone, administered orally) plus Behavioral Intervention: "psychosocial treatment" included "psychoeducation" "social skills" "healthy life style habits" "exercise in group"
Other Names:
  • Atypical antipsychotic
Participants will receive the Guideline Treatment (risperidone, administered orally) plus Behavioral Intervention: "psychosocial treatment" included "psychoeducation" "social skills" "healthy life style habits" "exercise in group"
Other Names:
  • "Psychoeducation"
  • "Social Skills"
  • "Healthy Life style"
  • "Exercise in group"
Active Comparator: 2 Treatment as Usual
Participants will receive the Treatment as Usual (atypical antipsychotic) plus psychosocial treatment decided by clinician
Participants will receive the Treatment as Usual (atypical antipsychotic) plus Behavioral Intervention: psychosocial treatment assigned by clinician.
Other Names:
  • Any other antipsychotic assigned by clinician

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder status, >30% reduction in PANSS score and improvement on CGI score.
Time Frame: six months
Responder status, defined by >30% reduction in PANSS scores and significant improvement on the CGI score. CGI significant improvement defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), or 2 (much improved).
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes assessed by the Personal and Social Performance Scale.
Time Frame: six months
Functional outcomes assessed by the Personal and Social Performance Scale. The lowest score represents lack of autonomy in the basic functioning and the highest score reflects excellent performance.
six months
Cognition assessed using The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
Time Frame: six months
Cognition assessed using "The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery"; includes ten trials evaluating seven cognitive domains; processing speed, verbal learning and visual, verbal working memory and non-verbal reasoning and problem solving, sustained attention, and social cognition.
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rosa E. Ulloa, Md Phd, Secretaria de Salud

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Guideline treatment (Risperidone, administered orally)

Subscribe