Effect of Ketamine+Propofol vs Remifentanyl+Propofol on Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions

May 5, 2017 updated by: CIGDEM YILDIRIM GUCLU, Ankara University
Laryngeal mask airway is a common tool for airway management during anesthesia in many surgeries. Insertion of laryngeal mask needs deep anesthesia, suppression of airway, stabile hemodynamic response. Many drug regimens has been used for this purpose. This study aimed to compare the insertion conditions of laryngeal mask by using ketamine+propofol versus remifentanil + propofol.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Cigdem Yildirim Guclu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Surgery performed with laryngeal mask as airway tool in gynecologic clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery requires laryngeal mask

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal, abdominal surgery required muscle relaxant, any allergy to ketamine or remifentanyl

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ketamine
Ketamine+propofol
To compare ketamine+propofol versus remifentanyl+propofol to maintain good laryngeal mask insertion conditions
Other Names:
  • Remifentanyl
Remifentanyl
Remifentanyl+propofol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
High laryngeal mask insertion scores
Time Frame: 3 minutes
3 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hypotension
Time Frame: 10 minutes
10 minutes
Hypertension
Time Frame: 10 minutes
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Çiğdem YILDIRIM GÜÇLÜ, MD, Ankara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on remifentanyl

Subscribe