Safety and Efficacy of Modified Folfirinox Versus Gemcis in Bile Duct Tumours (AMEBICA)

Randomised Phase II/III Study, Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Folfirinox Versus Gemcis in Locally Advanced, Unresectable and/or Metastatic Bile Duct Tumours

Bile duct tumours are rare. They are the 6th most common type of digestive cancer. Their therapeutic management is complex and must be multidisciplinary in nature. Most of the time, an endoscopic or radiological biliary drainage is necessary before any tumour treatment.

Their prognosis is poor due to the fact that they are normally diagnosed late, which makes curative surgery impossible. A population study in the Côte d'Or region of France reported a survival rate at 5 years of approximately 10%.

For the locally advanced or metastatic forms, treatment has not been properly codified. With respect to chemotherapy, prospective studies, most often phase II, are difficult to interpret due to a limited number of patients and due to the heterogeneity of this type of tumour (bile duct and pancreas tumours). Treatment with 5FU alone provides an objective response in approximately 10% of cases. In combination with mitomycin or carboplatin, the objective response rate is 20%, with a median survival period of 5 months. Interferon combined with 5FU has a better response rate (30%), but occurrences of different types of toxicity are more frequent.

More recently, gemcitabine and the 5FU-cisplatin combinations demonstrated objective tumour control in 50% of patients with a median survival period of 10 months. Gemcitabine combined with oxiplatin or with cisplatin has shown the same response rate but a median survival period of approximately 12 months.

The benefit of this combination has been confirmed in a phase III trial that compared the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination to gemcitabine alone, in 410 patients with locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic bile duct cancer. The results were in favour of the combined treatment with a median survival period of 11.7 months (versus 8.1 months - HR 0.64 [0.52 - 0.80]). This combination is currently the reference first-line treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

At the same time as these results, triple therapies involving 5FU + oxiplatin + irinotecan have objectively shown a significant increase in overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to gemcitabine alone (median of 11.1 months versus 6.8 months, HR = 0.57 [0.45 - 0.73] p < 0.0001). The response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) have also been improved with these triple therapies; the response rates were 31.6% versus 9.4% p < 0.001 and the median PFS 6.4 months versus 3.3 months p < 0.001, respectively.

The adverse events observed with the triple therapy occurred more frequently, for febrile neutropaenia (5.4%), with the need to treat with growth factors (G-CSF for 42.5% of patients). Haematological and digestive toxicity was also higher: grade 3-4 neutropaenia was observed for 45.7% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX arm and 18.7% of patients in the gemcitabine arm (p = 0.0001); vomiting was noted for 14.5% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX arm and 4.7% in the gemcitabine arm (p = 0.002). Quality of life was improved in the FOLFIRINOX arm.

Due to the histological, therapeutic and prognostic similarities between pancreatic and bile duct cancer, it is interesting to assess this triple therapy compared to the current reference treatment in bile duct cancers: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin (GEMCIS). Due to the known higher levels of toxicity for this triple therapy (digestive and haematological), the investigators modified the conventional FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFOLFIRINOX) by removing the 5-FU bolus at D1 of each cycle. This modification to the regimen would appear not to decrease the efficacy of the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

191

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
        • Chu Picardie
      • Angers, France
        • ICO Paul Papin
      • Argenteuil, France
        • CH Victor Dupouy
      • Bayonne, France, 64109
        • CH de la Côte Basque
      • Besançon, France
        • CHRU Besançon
      • Bobigny, France
        • Hôpital Avicenne
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Hopital Saint-Andre
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Polyclinique Nord
      • Boulogne sur Mer, France
        • Hôpital Duchenne
      • Caen, France
        • Centre Francois Baclesse
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • CHU d'Estaing
      • Colmar, France
        • Hôpitaux Civils
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France, 91100
        • CH SUd Francilien
      • Dijon, France
        • Centre Georges François Leclerc
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Centre de radiothérapie et oncologie du Parc
      • Grenoble, France
        • Hôpital Michallon
      • La Roche sur Yon, France
        • CHD Vendée
      • La Seyne sur Mer, France
        • Clinique du Cap d'Or
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
        • CH Le Kremlin Bicetre
      • Lille, France
        • CHRU Lille
      • Longjumeau, France, 91160
        • Centre Hospitalier de Longjumeau
      • Lyon, France
        • Centre Léon Berard
      • Lyon, France
        • Hopital de la Croix Rousse
      • Lyon, France
        • Hopital Lyon Sud
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Clinique de la Sauvegarde
      • Marseille, France
        • Hôpital Saint-Joseph
      • Nantes, France
        • Centre Catherine De Sienne
      • Orléans, France
        • CHR Orleans
      • Paris, France
        • HEGP
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Cochin
      • Perpignan, France
        • Hôpital Saint-Jean
      • Poitiers, France
        • Chu La Miletrie
      • Reims, France
        • Chu Reims
      • Rennes, France
        • Centre Eugene Marquis
      • Romans sur Isère, France
        • Hôpital Drome Nord
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU Rouen
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU Saint-etienne
      • Saint-Jean de Luz, France, 64500
        • CH Saint-Jean de Luz
      • Saint-Quentin, France
        • CH Saint-Quentin
      • Semur en Auxois, France
        • Ch Robert Morlevat
      • Strasbourg, France, 67065
        • CAC Paul Strauss
      • Tours, France
        • CHU Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - WHO 0 or 1
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Tumour of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic (and/or hilar) bile ducts, or of the gallbladder
  • Measurable abdominal metastases (at least a lesion >10 mm) and/or measurable, unresectable primary tumour
  • Disease proven by histopathology or cytology (on metastasis or primary tumour)
  • If there are no abdominal metastases, the unresectability must be confirmed by a hepatobiliary surgeon in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting
  • Bilirubin <1.5 N (after endoscopic or trance hepatic optimum biliary drainage, if necessary), AST and ALT <10N
  • Serum creatinine <130 µmol/L, creatinine clearance >60 mL/min
  • Neutrophils ≥ 1500/mm3 and platelets ≥ 75,000/mm3
  • Prothrombin index > 70%
  • Serum albumin > 25 g/L
  • Patient registered with a social security scheme (including CMU)
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Non-measurable metastases and primary tumour
  • Ampullary carcinoma or cancer of the pancreas with infiltration of the bile ducts or mixed tumours (hepatocholangiocarcinoma)
  • Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy within the last 4 months
  • Other malignant tumour except in situ basal cell carcinoma or curatively treated carcinoma of the uterine cervix or other malignant tumour that has been treated and has been considered cured for at least 5 years
  • Major comorbidity factors (unstable angina, myocardial infarction that has occurred within the last 6 months, heart failure ≥2 according to the NYHA classification, uncontrolled high blood pressure)
  • Woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding, or patient of either sex who is of childbearing age and not using an adequate contraceptive method
  • Not able to undergo the trial medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: GEMCIS

At D1 and D8 of each cycle, i.e. every 21 days for 6 months:

  • Cisplatin 25 mg/m² over 1 hour at D1 and D8
  • Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² over 30 minutes at D1 and D8.
Experimental: mFOLFIRINOX

At D1 of each cycle, i.e. every 15 days for 6 months:

  • Oxiplatin: 85 mg/m² (IP/120 minutes)
  • Irinotecan: 180 mg/m² (IV/90 minutes)
  • Folinic acid: 400 mg/m² (or 200 mg/m² if Elvorine [calcium levofolinate]) (IV/2 hours), via a Y connector at the same time as irinotecan
  • 5-FU: 2400 mg/m² (IV over 46 hours) without 5FU bolus at D1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of patients who are alive without radiological progession
Time Frame: up to 6 months

In phase II, the primary endpoint is the percentage of patients alive without radiological progression (assessed according to the RECIST v1.1 criteria) at 6 months (after randomisation).

Patients who are in radiological progression or who have died before the 6 months have elapsed will be considered a failure for the primary endpoint at 6 months (after randomisation).

A medical review will be conducted to decide on patients without radiological progression at 6 months; in the light of their entire medical file, they may be considered a failure (i.e. in progression) or they may be considered to be truly non-assessable (a 5% surplus of patients has been planned for this situation).

up to 6 months
overall survival
Time Frame: up to 6 years
In phase III, the primary endpoint is overall survival. This is defined as the period between the date of randomisation and the date of death (regardless of the cause). Patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at the end-point for the analysis, or at the date when they were last heard of.
up to 6 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: up to 6 months
In phase II, this is defined as the period between the date of randomisation and the date of death (regardless of the cause). Patients who are lost to follow-up will be censored at the end-point for the analysis, or at the date when they were last heard of.
up to 6 months
Tumour response
Time Frame: up to 6 months
In phase II, the best tumour response will be assessed across all the treatments and will be described using the figures for the different categories: complete response, partial response, stable, progression or non-assessable.
up to 6 months
Tumour response
Time Frame: up to 6 years
In phase III, the best tumour response will be assessed across all the treatments and will be described using the figures for the different categories: complete response, partial response, stable, progression or non-assessable.
up to 6 years
Toxicity of the treatment assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0
Time Frame: up to 6 months
In phase II, different types of toxicity assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0. Type of toxicity : Haematological (platelets and Neutrophils), Non-haematological (except for nausea, vomiting and alopecia) and neurological (paraesthesia)
up to 6 months
Toxicity of the treatment assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0
Time Frame: up to 6 years
In phase III, different types of toxicity assessed according to NCI-CTC v 4.0. Type of toxicity : Haematological (platelets and Neutrophils), Non-haematological (except for nausea, vomiting and alopecia) and neurological (paraesthesia)
up to 6 years
Biliary complications
Time Frame: up to 6 years
In phase III : angiocholitis, obstruction of the main bile ducts or biliary stent obstruction
up to 6 years
Biliary complications
Time Frame: up to 6 months
In phase II : angiocholitis, obstruction of the main bile ducts or biliary stent obstruction
up to 6 months
quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
Time Frame: up to 6 years
EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life. Quality-of-life assessments will be performed until progression of the disease
up to 6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Marc Phelip, PhD, CHU Saint-etienne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bile Duct Cancer

Clinical Trials on GEMCIS

3
Subscribe