Laparoscopic Assisted or Total Laparoscopic Appendectomy

February 1, 2016 updated by: Mehmet Kaplan, Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital

Laparoscopic Assisted or Total Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: a Matched Case-control, Cost-utility Study

Acute appendicitis (AA), is a common intra-abdominal surgical pathology with the overall incidence of approximately 7% and mortality of 0.2-0.8%. Treatment of choice is the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix by using open or laparoscopic appendectomy.

Following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) proved to be a feasible and at least as safe as the corresponding open procedure, it has rapidly gained worldwide acceptance. The traditional approach to LA uses three ports. Over the past decade, successful attempts to perform the procedure with fewer ports have been reported.

The authors' primary objectives were to 1) identify a simple, safe and feasible way to perform laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. 2) determine the health related quality of life of the patients and calculate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained after the procedures (LAA and TLA). 3) Purpose a surgical algorithm when approaching to acute appendicitis with the consideration of quality of health and cost.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Acute appendicitis (AA), is a common intra-abdominal surgical pathology with the overall incidence of approximately 7% and mortality of 0.2-0.8%. Treatment of choice is the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix by using open or laparoscopic appendectomy. Until the first laparoscopic removal of an inflamed appendix by Kurt Semm in 1980, the gold standard for surgical treatment of acute appendicitis remained open appendectomy as first described by McBurney in 1891.

At the beginning, LA remained questionable whether the benefits of the procedure outweigh over its disadvantages. However, since laparoscopic technology advances and surgeons' expertise increases, many surgeons have successfully performed a multitude of laparoscopic procedures for AA, with a continued increasing trend in its use. Eventually, after LA proved to be a feasible and at least as safe as the corresponding open procedure, it has rapidly gained worldwide acceptance.

There are more techniques for LA in the literature but only a few of them have gained to access and described in modern textbooks. The traditional approach to LA uses three ports. Over the past decade, successful attempts to perform the procedure with fewer ports have been reported which include two-port techniques, single-port techniques, and hybrid approaches. The two-port appendectomy technique consist of one port providing access for a rigid telescope with a working channel, and second port for a grasping forceps that is used to retract the appendix. In the single-port assisted technique, after a stitch is placed between the appendix and the anterior abdominal wall to pull the appendix and create a tension to facilitate dissection, and then appendectomy is performed intracorporeally. The hybrid technique formed from the combination of both open and laparoscopic approaches. Namely the appendix is pulled out through the only or one of the port, and a traditional open appendectomy is then performed extracorporeally.

The authors' primary objectives were to 1) identify a simple, safe and feasible way to perform laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. 2) determine the health related quality of life of the patients using Euro Qol (EQ) - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 3 Levels (3L) (EQ-5D-3L) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and calculate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained after the procedures (LAA and TLA). 3) Purpose a surgical algorithm when approaching to acute appendicitis with the consideration of quality of health and cost. For these purposes, a case-control study was designed in January 2015 to investigate these issues.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

451

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The control group (Group 1) comprised 108 matched-cases of uncomplicated appendicitis operated with total laparoscopic appendectomy within the period January 2008 through July 2011.

The study group (Group 2) is represented by 108 consecutive patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, operated with lap assisted appendectomy.

Group 3 consisted of 211 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, in whom Lap assisted ap were unsuccessful because of several reasons, were underwent to Total Lap App within the same period

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all acute appendicitis patients underwent total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Directly underwent TLA
Patients with the diagnosis who underwent directly total laparoscopic appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Other Names:
  • laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Lap Assisted App
Patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis who underwent a successful laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Other Names:
  • laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Advanced to TLA
Patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in whom laparoscopic assisted appendectomy attempted; however, because it fail advanced to total laparoscopic appendectomy.
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Other Names:
  • laparoscopic assisted appendectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A weekly change in EQ-5D-3L scores (Euro Qol 5 dimensions 3 levels)
Time Frame: two times: 7th and 14th day after the surgery
health related evaluation
two times: 7th and 14th day after the surgery
A weekly change in EQ-VAS scores (Euro Qol Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: two times: 7th and 14th day after the surgery
visual analogue scale of health related evaluation
two times: 7th and 14th day after the surgery
Calculation of Cost utility
Time Frame: within 1 month after surgery
depends on the calculation of hospital based costs and QALY
within 1 month after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio of conversion to TLA
Time Frame: within the first month after completion of the patient recruitment
Ratio of conversion of laparoscopic assisted to total laparoscopic appendectomy
within the first month after completion of the patient recruitment
Mean BMI of patients in the groups
Time Frame: within 1 month after completion of the patient recruitment
to asses the effect of higher body mass index on the success of procedures the authors will calculate BMI in each group
within 1 month after completion of the patient recruitment
The rate of the location of appendix
Time Frame: within 1 month after completion of the patient recruitment
To asses the the effect of the location of the appendix on the preference of surgical intervention
within 1 month after completion of the patient recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Appendicitis

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic appendectomy

3
Subscribe