- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02673892
Patient Oriented Discharge Summary Impact Study (PODS)
The Impact of a Patient-Centered Discharge Summary (PODS) on Patient Experience and Health Outcomes Following Discharge: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Full Title: The impact of a patient-centered discharge summary (PODS) on patient experience and health outcomes following discharge: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Short Title: PODS Impact Study
Primary Objective: To evaluate the impact of a patient-centered discharge instruction tool on patient experience following hospital discharge.
Primary Outcome Measure: Patient experience within 72 hours following discharge from hospital. Count of negative responses (i.e., "No", or "Not at all" or "Partly") to 6 prespecified questions on patient experience of transition of care answered 72 hours following discharge from hospital, with the first 5 questions from the CIHI Patient Experiences Survey - In-Patient Care (CPES-IC). Groups will be compared using a rate ratio (ratio of negative binomial rates).
Secondary Objectives: 1) Evaluate the impact of a patient-centered discharge instruction tool on health outcomes following hospital discharge. 2) Identify the level of patient and system engagement needed when providing discharge instructions and patient-specific characteristics that might impact the use and effectiveness of discharge instructions.
Secondary Outcome Measures: Self-reported adherence to medications, diet and activity restrictions, and scheduled visits with primary care physician and/or specialist at 30 days following discharge, and a composite of unscheduled visits to primary care physician, emergency room, readmission to hospital or death at 30 days and 3 months following discharge. Proportion of patients who responded "Yes", or "Quite a Bit" or "Completely", to 4 out of the 6 prespecified questions on patient experience of transitions of care, 72 hours following discharge from hospital as a measure of patient experience of their transition of care (original primary outcome, re-specified as secondary outcome based on DMC recommendation).
Study Design: The study will use a mixed methods approach with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and qualitative study.
Inclusion Criteria: All patients (>=18 years) admitted to inpatient units at University Health Network (UHN) (and other participating hospitals in Ontario) with a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, stroke, congestive heart failure, post hip and knee replacement will be recruited for randomization to receive the PODS versus standard of discharge care. These diseases were chosen to align with the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) quality based procedures.
Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are being discharged to another facility rather than home, who have a prognosis of less than 3 months, who do not have a telephone for post-discharge follow-up or with cognitive impairment or significant language barrier for whom a family member or professional interpreter is not available will be excluded from the study.
Intervention: The patient-oriented discharge summary (PODS) is a discharge instruction tool co-created with patients which provides a written template for providers to engage patients and caregivers when reviewing discharge instructions on medications, activity and diet restrictions, follow-up appointments or outstanding investigations and worrisome symptoms warranting emergency care (Appendix A). The PODS also uses plain and simple wording, large fonts, pictograms, and includes white space for patients to take notes and provides the option for translation of major headings into the most common spoken languages. As this will be a pragmatic design, we may make modifications to the process involved in completing the PODS, such as using pre-filled disease-specific information, if system processes and providers involved deem it more usable and feasible.
Sample Size: We estimate that we will require at minimum 199 and at maximum 388 patients in each study arm if we want to detect a 10% minimum improvement in patient experience scores. Currently, we have study centers that would like to participate in Toronto, Ottawa and Thunder Bay.
Accrual Period: Enrollment for this study will begin once ethics approval is obtained and continue until 776 patients have been enrolled (in total across all participating sites).
Study Duration: The study is expected to run between December 1, 2015 and March 31, 2018 (approximately 3 years) following research ethics board (REB) approval. This will allow for a year of study enrollment across participating sites until sample size is achieved as well as 3 months of follow-up for primary and secondary endpoints and a year for data analysis and manuscript preparation.
Data Monitoring Committee (DMC): A DMC was established on May 4, 2018, due to challenges in recruitment and widespread implementation of the intervention across multiple hospitals in Ontario resulting in a change in the standard of discharge care in the trial's setting. In view of the challenges in recruiting future patients, resource constraints, and statistical considerations, the DMC recommended that recruitment be stopped prematurely and that the analytical approach for the primary outcome be changed, analyzing the data as count data rather than dichotomized data. Study recruitment was stopped at the end of August 2018, after a total of 526 participants had been randomized, with final follow up of participants in December 2018 (see the Document Section for full details).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4'
- Toronto General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or over
- Able and willing to provide informed consent or have a substitute decision maker that can provide consent and agree to answer follow up as the patient's caregiver
- Admitted to hospital with either congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Stroke, Pneumonia, Hip Fracture, Knee Replacement or Hip Replacement
- Being discharged home or to a retirement home
- Have a Telephone for post-discharge follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have already received the PODS in the past
- Being discharged to nursing home, long-term care facility, rehabilitation or other hospital.
- Unable to communicate due to cognitive impairment or language barrier with no caregiver or interpreter available
- Palliative patient with life expectancy <= 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PODS intervention
The PODS intervention is administered during the discharge process which includes discharge teaching.
In the acute settings, discharge teaching is provided by a nurse navigator, resident physician, or other members of the care team.
In the rehabilitation setting, discharge teaching is provided by a multi-disciplinary team.
PODS is used as a useful add-on to the usual discharge teaching process.
The PODS form used during the study will be a fillable pdf.
Members of the healthcare team will fill it out electronically, then print it out and give the paper to the patient.
After the discharge teaching is finished, patients take the completed PODS home with them as a post-discharge reference and guide.
|
The PODS provides a written template for providers to engage patients and caregivers when reviewing important discharge instructions on medications, activity and diet restrictions, follow-up appointments and worrisome symptoms warranting emergency care.
The PODS also uses plain and simple wording, large fonts, pictograms, and includes white space for patients to take notes and provides the option for translation of major headings into the most common spoken languages.
As this will be a pragmatic design, we may make modifications to the process involved in completing the PODS, such as using pre-filled disease-specific information, if system processes and providers involved deem it more usable and feasible.
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients randomized to this arm will receive usual discharge care.
At UHN, this involves receiving a discharge summary with information pertaining to hospital course including investigations performed and medications used, as well as follow-up care suggested.
It is intended to be, unlike PODS, a document for the primary care physician seeing the patient after discharge to refer to.
As to discharge instructions provided for the patient, there is no standard procedure and sometimes follow-up instructions are included for the patient.
Patient education may or may not be provided to the patient verbally by their nurse, resident, physician, or pharmacist.
Moreover, follow-up with the primary care physician may be set up prior to or following discharge with the nurse navigator.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient experience of transition of care
Time Frame: 72 hours post-discharge
|
Count of negative responses to 6 questions, with first 5 from CIHI CPES-IC: 1.During this hospital stay, did doctors, nurses or other hospital staff talk with you about whether you would have the help you needed when you left the hospital?
2.During this hospital stay, did you get information in writing about what symptoms or health problems to look out for after you left the hospital?
3.Before you left the hospital, did you have a clear understanding about all of your prescribed medications, including those you were taking before your hospital stay?
4.Did you receive enough information from hospital staff about what to do if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left the hospital?
5.When you left the hospital, did you have a better understanding of your condition than when you entered?
6.When you left the hospital, did you have a clear understanding about your follow-up appointments and investigations?
Analysis change via DMC recommendation.
|
72 hours post-discharge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
medication adherence
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
self-reported adherence to all medications
|
30 and 90 days
|
|
diet adherence
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
self-reported adherence to diet restrictions
|
30 and 90 days
|
|
activity adherence
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
self-reported adherence to activity restrictions
|
30 and 90 days
|
|
appointment adherence
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
self-reported adherence to scheduled appointments
|
30 and 90 days
|
|
unscheduled utilization
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
|
a binary composite outcome of any unscheduled visits to primary care physician, emergency room, readmission to hospital or death
|
30 and 90 days
|
|
Patient experience measure [original primary outcome measure]
Time Frame: 72 hours post-discharge
|
Proportion of patients who responded "Yes", or "Quite a Bit" or "Completely", to 4 out of the 6 prespecified questions on patient experience of transitions of care, 72 hours following discharge from hospital as a measure of patient experience of their transition of care (original primary outcome, re-specified as secondary outcome based on DMC recommendation).
|
72 hours post-discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen Okrainec, MD, UHN
- Principal Investigator: Howard B Abrams, MD, UHN
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-9735-AE
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pneumonia
-
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnHospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia | Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
-
King Edward Memorial HospitalCompletedNosocomial Pneumonia | Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia | Aspiration Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaIndia
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of MedicineUnknownCommunity Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator Associated Pneumonia | Hospital Acquired PneumoniaSlovenia
-
Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityWithdrawnHospital-acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
-
Hannover Medical SchoolCharite University, Berlin, Germany; University of LeipzigUnknownCOVID-19 | Bacterial Pneumonia | Viral Pneumonia | Pneumonia Due to Streptococcus Pneumoniae | Pneumonia Due to H. Influenzae | Pneumonia, Organism Unspecified | Pneumonia in Diseases Classified Elsewhere | Pneumonia Due to Other Specified Infectious OrganismsGermany
-
Nantes University HospitalSociété Française d'Anesthésie et de RéanimationCompletedPneumonia | Sepsis | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Hospital Acquired PneumoniaFrance
-
Universidad de la SabanaClínica Universidad de La Sabana; Universidad de La Sabana, ColombiaCompletedPneumococcal Pneumonia | Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Colombia
-
ShionogiCompletedHospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) | Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) | Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)Israel, Spain, United States, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Latvia, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Russian Federation, Serbia, Taiwan, Ukraine
-
PfizerCompletedVentilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) | Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP)Bulgaria, France, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Philippines, China, Ukraine, Argentina, Brazil, Hungary, Romania, India, Japan, Taiwan, Latvia, Czechia, Slov... and more
-
Arpida AGTerminatedHospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia
Clinical Trials on Patient Oriented Discharge Summary
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompleted
-
University of LausanneCompleted
-
Unity Health TorontoCompletedContinuity of Patient Care | Patient Discharge | Medical Records Systems, Computerized | Hospital Information SystemsCanada
-
Geisinger ClinicCompletedEmergency Service, HospitalUnited States
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)University of Illinois at ChicagoCompletedInterprofessional Relations | Information DisseminationUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemCompletedSelf-preformed Hand ExaminationUnited States
-
Heart Care FoundationNovartis Farma S.p.A.Not yet recruitingAcute Coronary Syndromes | Chronic Coronary SyndromesItaly
-
Wesley Justino MagnaboscoCompletedProstatic NeoplasmsBrazil
-
University of PittsburghNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedSleep Apnea, ObstructiveUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongQueen Mary Hospital, Hong KongNot yet recruitingPrimary HealthcareHong Kong