Patellar Resurfacing Under Subvastus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty

February 16, 2016 updated by: Yong In, The Catholic University of Korea

Comparison of Clinical Results of Patella Resurfacing Versus Patellar Retention Under Subvastus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

This study aims to compare the clinical results of patella resurfacing or not under subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Even though the excellent results of total knee arthroplasty(TKA), there is persistent controversy over whether or not to replace the patella. Anterior knee pain continued to be a unsolved problem of TKA patients. Some surgeons always performed patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty but the others didn't do that. It's up to surgeon's preference. There were several studies of patellar resurfacing or not in TKA. But previous studies almost have been done under other approach, not a subvastus approach.

This study prospectively randomized patients receiving bilateral TKA with patellar resurfacing or not in each knee. Patients preference and clinical results was investigated in both knee of same patients who received patellar resurfacing or not during minimum 2 year follow up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this work was to compare pain, stiffness and function between groups at minimum 2 year postoperatively. Secondarily, we compared pain, patient preference at minimum 2 year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no difference between the two groups of subjects in the measured outcomes.

Patients receiving TKA were prospectively enrolled before surgery and randomized intraoperatively to either receive patella replacement or not in both knee of same patients. Subjects were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively for pain, function, and stiffness using a disease-specific (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) . Other measurements like Knee Society score, Feller's score, Patient satisfaction (VAS) also checked pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for total knee arthroplasty
  • Having medicare insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not able to cooperate
  • Serious deformity (not suitable for a standard TKA prosthesis)
  • Patellar thickness less than 18 mm
  • Prior operation involving the extensor mechanism
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe medical disability limiting the ability to walk
  • Revision surgery
  • Knees with predominantly patellofemoral arthrosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patella resurfacing group
Procedure: Patellar component Resurfacing with onlay technique
Active Comparator: patella retention
Procedure: patellar retention Trimming of osteophytes when appropriate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index) pain scale
Time Frame: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Knee Society score
Time Frame: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Feller's score
Time Frame: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Patients satisfaction using Visual Analog Score for pain
Time Frame: Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years
Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Patella resurfacing

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Patella Resurfacing

Clinical Trials on Patella resurfacing

Subscribe