- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02699866
Implant Survival After Insertion of Bone Level Tapered (BLT) Implant Ø 2.9 mm in the Clinical Practice Setting
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Single Cohort, Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study to Assess Implant Survival After Insertion of Straumann® Bone Level Tapered (BLT) Implant Ø 2.9 mm in the Clinical Practice Setting
The Straumann Bone Level Tapered (BLT) implant Ø 2.9 mm implant was developed to allow treatment of patients with single tooth gaps of small dimensions in the lateral and central incisor positions in the mandible and in the lateral incisor positions in the maxilla. These positions are reduced-load-bearing compared to more posterior positions.
During this study performance and safety of the Straumann BLT implants Ø 2.9 mm in the clinical practice setting will be investigated.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a multi-center, prospective, single cohort, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study. The total study duration for each patient should be 12 ± 1 months.
Straumann BLT implants Ø 2.9 mm will be placed in central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single tooth replacement, followed by provisional prosthetic loading after 6 ± 2 weeks and by final prosthetic loading 4 ± 1 months after implant placements.
In total 7 visits per patient are scheduled in this study. Implant survival, PES, implant success, bone level changes and adverse events (AEs) will be assessed.
The investigational device is a CE-(Conformité Européenne, meaning European Conformity) marked product. Straumann BLT implants Ø 2.9 mm Roxolid SLActive (sand blasted, large grit, acid etched surface) are available in lengths of 10, 12 and 14 mm.
Four centers in Germany will participate. The study and any amendments will be performed as far as possible according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14155 and conform to the Declaration of Helsinki (last revision Fortaleza 2013) and local legal and regulatory requirements.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Düsseldorf, Germany, 40210
- Kieferchirurgische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Dr. Stroink & Kollegen
-
Mainz, Germany, 55128
- Medi+
-
Mainz, Germany, 55131
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Klinik für Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie, Plastische Operationen
-
Münster, Germany, 48149
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
-
Zwickau, Germany, 08056
- Kieferchirurgische Praxen Hentschel & Herrmann
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must have voluntarily signed the Informed Consent Form before any study related procedures are performed, are willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits and agree that the pseudonymized data are collected and analyzed.
- Patients must be males or females who are a minimum of 18 years of age.
- Patients with a minimum of 4 weeks history of edentulism in the study area, minimal interdental space and in need of a single tooth replacement with a dental implant central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla (Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) positions 12, 22, 31, 32, 41 or 42).
- Presence of natural tooth or implants adjacent to the study implant position (single tooth gap).
- Patients with complete soft tissue coverage of the socket at implant placement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with inadequate bone volume and / or quality or metabolic bone disorder.
- Patients with local root remnants.
- Patients with inadequate wound healing capacity.
- Patients with not completed maxillary and mandibular growth.
- Patients with serious internal medical problems, uncontrolled bleeding disorders, psychoses, prolonged therapy-resistant functional disorders, xerostomia, weakened immune system, illnesses requiring periodic use of steroids or uncontrollable endocrine disorders.
- Patients with poor general state of health.
- Patients with drug or alcohol abuse.
- Patients with allergies or hypersensitivity to chemical ingredients of titanium-zirconium alloy.
- Patients with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability.
- A woman who is pregnant or planning to become pregnant at any point during the study duration.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: BLT Implant Ø 2.9 mm
The Straumann BLT Implants Ø 2.9 mm are available with a length of 10, 12 and 14 mm.
|
Placement of Straumann BLT implants Ø 2.9 mm in central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single tooth replacement followed by prosthetic loading.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implant Survival Rate at 12 Months After Implant Placement
Time Frame: 12 months after implant placement
|
A "surviving implant" is an implant stably inserted in the subject's jaw bone at the time of assessment.
|
12 months after implant placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pink Esthetic Score (PES) at 6 Months After Implant Placement
Time Frame: 6 months after implant placement
|
The Pink esthetic score allows an objective evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue of single tooth implants based on 7 variables and is highly reproducible.
Each variable will be assessed using a 0-1-2 scoring system; 0 being the lowest, and 2 being the highest value.
The minimum achievable PES is 0 and the maximum score is 14.
The higher the value, the better the outcome.
|
6 months after implant placement
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implant Success Rate at 12 Months After Implant Placement
Time Frame: 12 months after implant placement
|
A "successful implant" is an implant where all of the following success criteria (according to Buser et al., 1992) apply:
|
12 months after implant placement
|
Marginal Bone Level Changes at 12 Months After Implant Placement
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months after implant placement
|
An independent expert is contracted to perform the bone level measurements from the X-rays.
The vertical bone level is evaluated by measuring the distance from the implant shoulder to the first visible bone contact on the implant.
Measurements are taken at the mesial and distal aspects of the implant, and an average value is calculated.
Mean bone level changes are computed by subtracting the average bone level at 12 months after implant placement from the average bone level at baseline (implant placement).
Hence, negative bone level changes are representing bone loss; vice versa positive changes representing bone gain.
Measurements take into account distortion based on changes on the radiograph from the true dimension of the implant.
|
Baseline and 12 months after implant placement
|
Incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, 7-14 days after implant placement, 6 weeks after implant placement, 4 months after implant placement, 6 months after implant placement and 12 months after implant placement
|
At each visit the Investigator should determine if any adverse events occurred since the last study visit by speaking with the patient and reviewing any dental and medical records.
These AEs, along with any AEs from the current study visit, should be documented and reported as described in Section 8 of the protocol.
In addition the Investigator should evaluate the status of any ongoing AEs throughout the study.
|
Screening, Baseline, 7-14 days after implant placement, 6 weeks after implant placement, 4 months after implant placement, 6 months after implant placement and 12 months after implant placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Keyvan Sagheb, Dr., Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Klinik für Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie, Plastische Operationen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
- Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
- Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:26-8. No abstract available.
- Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available.
- Klein MO, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:43-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.3.
- Steinemann SG. Titanium--the material of choice? Periodontol 2000. 1998 Jun;17:7-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00119.x. No abstract available.
- Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):538-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00289.x. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
- Kobayashi E, Matsumoto S, Doi H, Yoneyama T, Hamanaka H. Mechanical properties of the binary titanium-zirconium alloys and their potential for biomedical materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995 Aug;29(8):943-50. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820290805.
- Al-Nawas B, Bragger U, Meijer HJ, Naert I, Persson R, Perucchi A, Quirynen M, Raghoebar GM, Reichert TE, Romeo E, Santing HJ, Schimmel M, Storelli S, ten Bruggenkate C, Vandekerckhove B, Wagner W, Wismeijer D, Muller F. A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV small-diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles--results from a 1-year observation period. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):896-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00324.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Benic GI, Gallucci GO, Mokti M, Hammerle CH, Weber HP, Jung RE. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1052-61. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
- Al-Nawas B, Domagala P, Fragola G, Freiberger P, Ortiz-Vigon A, Rousseau P, Tondela J. A Prospective Noninterventional Study to Evaluate Survival and Success of Reduced Diameter Implants Made From Titanium-Zirconium Alloy. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):e118-25. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00149. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Quirynen M, Al-Nawas B, Meijer HJ, Razavi A, Reichert TE, Schimmel M, Storelli S, Romeo E; Roxolid Study Group. Small-diameter titanium Grade IV and titanium-zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: three-year results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):831-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12367. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
- Laurell L, Lundgren D. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00182.x.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR02/15
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss
-
Institut Straumann AGCompleted
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
Duygu KarasanHacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionEgypt
-
Eisenhower Army Medical CenterUnknownLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Osteogenics BiomedicalCompletedLoss of Teeth Due to Extraction
-
Institut Straumann AGTerminated
-
Heidelberg UniversityCompletedTooth Loss, Teeth Replaced Using All Ceramic FPDsGermany
-
Ege UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on BLT Implant Ø 2.9 mm
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompleted
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyUnited States
-
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to...Not yet recruitingTooth Loss | Partial-edentulism
-
Zimmer BiometActive, not recruitingEpicondylitis of the Elbow | Biceps Tendon DisorderUnited States, Spain
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedShoulder DislocationBrazil
-
Zimmer BiometEnrolling by invitationSLAP Lesion | Capsular Shift/Capsulolabral Reconstruction | Deltoid Repair | Bankart Lesions | Biceps Tendon Disorder | Acromioclavicular; Dislocation | Rotator Cuff Tear RepairSpain, United States
-
University Hospital, GhentCompleted
-
Institut Straumann AGActive, not recruiting
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompletedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalUnited Kingdom
-
Institut Straumann AGCompleted