Clinical Outcomes of Buffered 1% Lidocaine vs. Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine

August 31, 2018 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes

Anecdotal data suggest that the buffered form of the local anesthetic is more potent at equal dosages, and a lower dosage of the drug might be used with an effect equal to higher dosage not buffered. Clinical data are needed to confirm these anecdotal data. No data exist comparing buffered local anesthetics at lower drug concentrations to current dosages commonly used in dental and oral surgical procedures

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Specific Aims:

Compare clinical depths of pulpal anesthesia (cold, Electronic Pulp Test) for mandibular molar, and canine teeth at 30 minute intervals post injection for mandibular block anesthesia with buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Hypotheses:

No differences exist in anesthetic depth for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral injection for mandibular block anesthesia between buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Study Time Frame: 6 months Month One: Recruit 24 volunteers as subjects. Prepare case-books. Months Two-Three: Clinical Study, Months Four-Five: Analyze data Month Six: Prepare Abstracts, Papers Methods: Blinded, Randomized Clinical Design Recruit subjects with Institutional Review Board approved consent at UNC Subjects will serve as their own controls in a cross-over AB/BA study design which is uniform within sequences, uniform within periods, and balanced Randomized subjects to be injected orally for mandibular block (inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves) alternatively with 4cc of buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine and 4cc non-buffered of 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Assessment: pre, and post-anesthetic administration for pulpal anesthesia with cold, Electronic Pulp Test: Mandibular molar, canine at 30 minute intervals Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-30 years, American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) I Exclusion Criteria Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs, Local anesthetic drug past week Current symptoms teeth or oral mucosa. SAS will be used for database management and statistical analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7450
        • UNC School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-30 years, ASA I

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs Local anesthetic drug use in past week Current symptoms teeth or oral mucosa

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Buffered 1% lidocaine

In week one each subject would receive either anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves.

In week two the alternate anesthetic would be administered.

Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia
Drug: Lidocaine
Lidocaine
Other Names:
  • xylocaine
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Non-Buffered lidocaine

In week two each subject would receive the alternate anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves.

Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia
Drug: Lidocaine
Lidocaine
Other Names:
  • xylocaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia
Time Frame: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total
Subject's Mandibular first molar teeth tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electric Pulp Test as reported by subjects as a "yes" or "no."
Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total
Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia
Time Frame: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total
Subject's Mandibular canine teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electronic Pulp Test for presence of anesthesia as reported by participants "yes" or "no."
Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymond P White, Jr., DDS, PhD, UNC Dept Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-0068a

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plans

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Zimbabwe

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe