- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02723175
The Effects of CBT and tDCS on Fibromyalgia Patients
The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Fibromyalgia Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 1 year.
- Between the ages of 21 and 85
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other chronic pain conditions
- on chronic opioid therapy
- history of seizures
- are or might be pregnant
- metal/electronic implants or devices above the waist
- moderate to severe depression (HDRS >19)
- moderate to severe anxiety (BAI >16)
- Latex allergy
- Psychiatric illness other than mild depression or anxiety
- on medications that lower seizure threshold
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sham tDCS Stimulation
30 minutes of the sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people. |
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people.
|
Experimental: Anodal tDCS Stimulation of DLPFC
30 minutes of the active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people. |
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is a minimally invasive technique that uses a small amount of electricity (2mA) to temporarily stimulate specific brain areas in awake people.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
Before treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants.
The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing.
The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance).
The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius.
The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius.
Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold.
Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.
|
Before Treatment
|
Post Baseline Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Time Frame: One week Post Treatment
|
After treatment, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) will be completed for all participants.
The QST involves a comprehensive laboratory pain assessment including heat stimuli using a Pathway Thermo-sensory Analyzer System which is specifically designed for assessing laboratory pain testing.
The QST collects the temperature in celsius of when the participant first begins to feel the stimuli (Sensory), starts to feel pain (average pain threshold), and when the participant can no longer tolerate the stimuli (Tolerance).
The temperature ranges from 37 degrees celsius to 50 degrees celsius.
The minimum temperature on the scale is 37 degrees celsius and the maximum temperature on the scale is 50 degrees celsius.
Average pain threshold: A lower temperature represents a lower pain threshold and a higher temperature represents a higher pain threshold.
Tolerance: A lower temperature represents a lower pain tolerance and a higher temperature represents a higher pain tolerance.
|
One week Post Treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at baseline.
The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex.
The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms.
The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression.
Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.
|
Before Treatment
|
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral).
It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety.
The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63.
Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.
|
Before Treatment
|
Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
To assess each participant's average pain at baseline, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered.
The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings.
Participants rate their average pain in the past 24 hours using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.
|
Before Treatment
|
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit 3
Time Frame: Treatment Session 3 (week 3)
|
Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 1 until Treatment 3. Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale.
0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain.
Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 1 and treatment 3. The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 1 to treatment 3 was calculated below.
Time points at week 1 and week 3 were included to calculate percent change.
|
Treatment Session 3 (week 3)
|
Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
Participants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline.
The possible total range of scores (Sensory and Affective subscales together) is 0 to 45.
The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale awith 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ.
The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33.
The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale for both groups.
The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.
|
Before Treatment
|
The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
To assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at Baseline, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered.
The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996).
The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life.
Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
|
Before Treatment
|
The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at Baseline
Time Frame: Before Treatment
|
To assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at baseline, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered.
The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours.
Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10.
For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued.
The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.
|
Before Treatment
|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at 1 Month Follow up
Time Frame: 1 month follow up
|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) will be used for screening purposes to characterize depression in each participant at the one month follow up visit.
The BDI is a 21 item participant rated inventory that evaluates depression symptoms, cognition, and physical symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, lack of interest in sex.
The BDI scale also assesses suicidal ideation, those patients exhibiting suicidal ideations will be referenced to a therapist in order to further manage their depressive symptoms.
The Total score range is 0 to 63; higher score indicates more depression.
Individual items are scored on a 4 point scale (0 to 3), with 0=none/absent and 3=most severe.
|
1 month follow up
|
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 3 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 3 Month Follow Up
|
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-researched, brief self-report anxiety-screening instrument that assesses different aspects of anxiety experience (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral).
It was designed to measure participant's level of anxiety.
The scale is unidimensional and the total score rages from 0 to 63.
Low scores are associated with low levels of anxiety, while high scores are associated with high levels of anxiety.
|
3 Month Follow Up
|
Brief Pain Inventory-Average Pain at 1 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 1 Month Follow Up
|
At the one month follow up visit, The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-short form will be administered to assess each participant's pain on average in the past 30 days.
The BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning and has been widely used in both research and clinical settings.
Participants rate their pain on average in the past 30 days using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain.
|
1 Month Follow Up
|
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at Treatment Visit Six
Time Frame: Treatment Session 6 (week 6)
|
Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day from the start of Treatment 3 until Treatment 6.
Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale.
0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain.
Daily ratings were averaged at treatment 3 and treatment 6.
The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 3 to treatment 6 was calculated below.
Time points at week 3, and week 6 were included to calculate percent change.
|
Treatment Session 6 (week 6)
|
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 1 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 1 Month Follow Up
|
Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day 30 days post treatment 6 (1 month follow up).
Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale.
0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain.
The 30 Daily ratings (Post Treatment 6) were averaged and The change in average daily pain ratings from treatment 6 to the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) was calculated below.
Time points week 6, and the 1 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.
|
1 Month Follow Up
|
Percent Change in Average Daily Pain at 3 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 3 Month Follow Up
|
Participants were asked to rate their pain on average every day for 60 days, post 1 month follow up visit.
Average pain ratings were on 0-10 scale.
0=No Pain at all and 10=Extreme Pain.
The 3 Month Follow Up included 60 Daily Pain ratings (Collected Post 1 Month Follow Up) that were averaged.
The change in average daily pain ratings from the 1 month follow up (30 days post completion of treatment visit 6) to the 3 Month Follow Up (60 days post completion of the 1 month follow up visit) was calculated below.
Time points 1 month follow up, and 3 month follow up were included to calculate percent change.
|
3 Month Follow Up
|
Affective Subscale of McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 1 Month Follow Up
|
Participants completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form (MPQ) at Baseline.
The possible total range of scores is 0 to 45.
The MPQ has two pain dimensions: 1.Sensory subscale with 11 words, and 2.Affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ.
The range of scores for the sensory dimension of pain is 0-33.
The data below report the mean score for the affective subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire for both groups.
The range of scores for the affective subscale being 0-12 with Higher scores indicating worse pain.
|
1 Month Follow Up
|
The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey at 1 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 1 Month Follow Up
|
To assess each participant's mental and physical functioning at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Short-Form 12 Healthy Survey (SF-12) will be administered.
The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey (Ware, Kosinski, and Keller, 1996).
The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scales that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life.
Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
|
1 Month Follow Up
|
The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire at 1 Month Follow Up
Time Frame: 1 Month Follow Up
|
To assess the impact of fibromyalgia on each participant's function at the 1 Month Follow Up visit, The Fibromyalgia (FM) Impact Questionnaire will be administered.
The FM assesses the following symptoms; physical Impairment, well-being, pain, fatigue, rested, stiffness, anxiety, and depression within the past 24 hours.
Each symptom scale ranges from 0 to 10.
For example, 0=no pain and 10=extreme pain, 0=not fatigued and 10=extremely fatigued.
The final score is the total score which ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia on functioning.
|
1 Month Follow Up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Borckardt, Ph.D., Medical University of South Carolina
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00039603
- 1R21AR066428-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafRecruitingChronic Post Operative Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Knee PainSpain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
University of UtahRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Evolve Restorative CenterFlowonix Medical; Celéri Health, Inc.; Advanced Infusion SolutionsCompletedPain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable | Chronic Nonmalignant PainUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionActive, not recruitingPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedHip Pain Chronic | Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Knee Pain ChronicUnited States
Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompleted
-
Medical University of South CarolinaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownEpilepsy IntractableBrazil
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)CompletedStroke | Nonfluent AphasiaUnited States
-
Dina Hatem ElhammadyUnknown
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyRecruitingSpinal Cord Diseases | Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUnknown
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health servicesRecruitingCervicogenic HeadacheCanada
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
Nanyang Technological UniversityActive, not recruiting