Lifestyle Enriching Activities for Research in Neuroscience Intervention Trial: LEARNit Study

September 18, 2024 updated by: Judy Pa, University of Southern California
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of modifiable lifestyle factors including exercise and healthy living on brain health. The investigators will compare 2 types of interventions, moderate aerobic walking vs. healthy living education, over 6 months to evaluate changes in brain health, cognition, and physical function in older adults with cognitive concerns.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cognitive decline in older adults is a major public health issue. The cost of caring for older adults with substantial cognitive impairment, like those with Alzheimer's Disease in the US is approximately $200 billion a year, causing major societal, economic, and caregiving burden. Despite great advances towards diagnosing these problems, the discovery of effective treatments has been minimal. Exploring non-pharmacological interventions, such as exercise and healthy living, have gained momentum. These promising, modifiable lifestyle interventions have the potential for delaying disease onset and slowing decline in cognition. However, the therapeutic effect of lifestyle interventions in patients with mild cognitive impairment, a prime intervention period for treatment, is not well understood. Therefore, in this study, the investigators will examine brain, body, and cognitive changes in older adults who engage in moderate-aerobic walking or healthy living education.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90032
        • University of Southern California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female
  2. English-speaking
  3. 55-80 years old
  4. Exhibits sedentary behavior
  5. Objective cognitive impairment
  6. Mini-Mental State Exam score > 26
  7. Perform at least 1 standard deviations below normative values on cognitive tests
  8. Absence of dementia
  9. Ability to complete both MRI and PET scans
  10. Physically capable of completing health programs

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Baseline dementia
  2. History of a neurological disorder
  3. Current psychiatric illness
  4. Head trauma with a loss of consciousness > 10 minutes
  5. Severe sensory deficits
  6. Substance abuse
  7. Depression (GDS < 8 of 15)
  8. Inability to perform intervention (e.g., inability to walk without assistance)
  9. Contraindications to MRI scan (e.g., pacemaker)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Moderate-aerobic walking
Participants will complete a 6-month home-based moderate-aerobic walking program of 150 minutes per week with the assistance of an interventionist.
Radioligand that binds to proteins using a PET/CT scanner.
Wrist device that will track daily physical activity
Placebo Comparator: Healthy Living Education
Participants will receive monthly topics on healthy living lifestyles for self-paced reading over 6 months with the assistance of an interventionist.
Radioligand that binds to proteins using a PET/CT scanner.
Wrist device that will track daily physical activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Brain Scan as a Measure of Brain Function
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Functional MRI has proven to be an effective non-invasive, in-vivo tool for measuring brain function via the BOLD signal. Growing evidence supports that fMRI BOLD can detect neuronal changes that occur very early in the disease process. The hippocampus has been shown to be a selectively vulnerable region in AD, and several studies, including our own, identified a aberrant brain signal in the hippocampus in older adults. The typical range for this outcome is -10 to 10 with higher scores indicating better brain function.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Mnemonic Similarity Test as a Measure of Memory (Cognition)
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
The participants will encode a series of objects presented on a computer. Following the encoding period, they will begin their fMRI scan and be asked to indicate if they recognize the objects on the screen, which include targets (previously seen objects), lures (objects that are similar to previously seen objects) and novel (unrelated objects). The discrimination between Targets and Lures will indicate the rate at which participants "correctly reject" the Lures (via pattern separation) or "false alarm" to the Lures (via pattern completion). The theoretical range for this outcome is -1 to 1 with higher scores indicating better memory function.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan as a Measure of Tracer Binding (SUVr)
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Each participant received PET scans with Neuraceq [florbetaben F 18 (FBB)] to measure amyloid-beta PET binding. IV injections of the tracers (FBB, -8.11 6 0.6 mCi) were done outside of the scanning room. Four 5-min frames were acquired 90 minutes after injection.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Single-stage Treadmill Test
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
This is a measure of cardiovascular fitness. This test has been validated against peak VO2 max with r=0.96. Heart rate response is monitored with a Polar heart rate monitor and the heart rate at the end of the 4 min test is used to estimate VO2max using an established equation for conversion. The theoretical range for this outcome is 0 to 200 with higher scores indicating better cardiovascular fitness.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Modified Physical Function Test
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
This test is a measure of multiple domains related to functional activities of daily living. Each physical activity in score is of varying difficulty level. The theoretical range for this outcome is 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating better physical function.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
Brain-derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) as a Measure From Blood
Time Frame: Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months
We will quantitatively analyze pre- and post-measurements of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). BDNF has been shown to increase after exercise intervention in humans and peripheral increases in these hormones correlate to cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. We measure total BDNF from plasma.
Baseline and Follow-up at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AG046928

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data requests will be reviewed by the data committee. Approved investigators will be provided de-identified participant-level data from the trial as a .CSV file.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available starting July 1, 2025 and for at least 3 years.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Moderate-aerobic walking

Subscribe