Preoperative Ascites Drainage Versus Standard Care for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

April 29, 2017 updated by: Maciej Stukan, MD, PhD, Gdynia Oncology Center

Preoperative Slow Ascites Drainage Versus Standard Care for Patients With Proven or Suspected Advanced Ovarian Cancer - a Hemodynamic Impact on Systemic Circulation, Patient's Nutritional Status and Quality of Life: a Randomized Trial.

Patients with significant ascites and advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), undergoing complex, cytoreductive surgery are at risk of malnutrition, poor quality of life and the risk of hypo- or hypervolemia in a perioperative period. All these factors may cause hemodynamic consequences during anesthesia and surgery, and elevate the risk of morbidity and mortality.

The objective of the study is to evaluate, whether slow ascites evacuation for a few days before the surgery for AOC, could 1) influence the hemodynamic consequences of ascites on systemic circulation in patients undergoing surgery, 2) improve patient's quality of life and 3) ability to feed correctly before treatment starts, and thus lower the risk of perioperative morbidity.

Eligible patients are those with significant ascites, diagnosed or suspected for AOC, who are scheduled for primary surgery (both upfront cytoreduction or laparoscopic evaluation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy), that cannot be performed within next 7 or more days, for any reason. Patients will be asked to fill in quality of life questionnaire (QLQ). Clinical data, a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) will be recorded. Patients will be randomized to either intervention arm A - insertion of vascular catheter into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic, daily ascites evacuation, or to observation arm B - standard of care with just observation (acute large volume (>5000ml) paracentesis allowed if needed). Patients in both groups will be encouraged to use oral nutritional support. Randomization will be open, 1:1, for every eligible, consecutive patient. After 7 days patients will be interviewed, asked to fill in QLQ, patient's experience on the treatment survey, a SGA will be recorded. During the first hour of the surgery hemodynamic data from anethetic charts will be recorded along with other clinical data concerning patient's characteristics, surgery details and 30-day postoperative follow-up. A template is provided.

The hypothesis of the study is that slow, systematic ascites evacuation few days before surgery for advanced ovarian cancer can facilitate hemodynamic control of systemic circulation of patients undergoing surgery, and improve patients' quality of life, feeding ability before treatment starts. Secondary we would expect lower risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gdynia, Poland, 81-519
        • Gdynia Oncology Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with significant ascites and suspected ovarian cancer scheduled for upfront cytoreductive surgery, or diagnostic laparoscopy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the surgery is planned to be performed in at least 7 days,
  • signed informed consent of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ascites not of malignant origin,
  • low volume ascites,
  • other then primary ovarian malignancy suspected,
  • suspected or clinically apparent infection especially at the site of planned drainage placement,
  • no patient's consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ascites drainage before surgery.
A group of patients with (or suspected for) advanced ovarian cancer and significant ascites. An indwelling catheter insertion into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic ascites evacuation for 7 or more days before surgery (if it cannot be scheduled immediately) will be performed. Patients will undergo an interview, will be asked to fill in questionnaires concerning a quality of life and nutritional status. If available noninvasive bioimpedance analysis will be performed and 2ml of blood will be taken for serum prealbumin concentration evaluation. If possible 20ml of ascitic fluid will be taken for cytology examination.
Systematic ascites evacuation via indwelling catheter inserted into abdominal cavity, sutured to the skin. Drainage performed by the patient, on demand with day limit of 2000ml, in ambulatory settings.
Interview according to provided chart in order to collect data concerning symptoms, co-morbidities.
Patients will be asked to fill in a quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-C15-PAL) before randomization and 7 days later.
Patients will be asked to fill in (together with a physician) a questionnaire to assess risk of malnutrition (SGA) before randomization and 7 days later.
Other: Observation.
A group of patients with (or suspected for) advanced ovarian cancer and significant ascites. A standard of care: observation or acute paracentesis (>5000ml) will be performed while waiting for the surgery (if it cannot be scheduled immediately). Patients will undergo an interview, will be asked to fill in questionnaires concerning a quality of life and nutritional status. If available noninvasive bioimpedance analysis will be performed and 2ml of blood will be taken for serum prealbumin concentration evaluation. If possible 20ml of ascitic fluid will be taken for cytology examination.
Interview according to provided chart in order to collect data concerning symptoms, co-morbidities.
Patients will be asked to fill in a quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-C15-PAL) before randomization and 7 days later.
Patients will be asked to fill in (together with a physician) a questionnaire to assess risk of malnutrition (SGA) before randomization and 7 days later.
Evacuation of a large (>5000ml) volume of ascites via single abdominocentesis. Allowed in observational arm only, in case of acute symptoms concerned with ascites.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in median arterial pressure (MAP) during anesthesia.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Changes (minimal and maximal) in median arterial pressure during 1st hour of anesthesia during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage. MAP calculation - MAP = [(2 x diastolic)+systolic] / 3.
1 hour
Volume of intravenous fluids transfused.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Volume of intravenous fluids transfused during the 1st hour of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.
1 hour
Number of participants who required vasoconstrictors.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Need for using vasoconstrictors during 1st hour of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.
1 hour
Changes in Heart Rate (HR).
Time Frame: 1 hour
Changes in HR (minimal and maximal) during 1st hour of anesthesia during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in feeding ability.
Time Frame: 7 days
Evaluation of changes in feeding ability before the treatment starts, according to Subjective Global Assesment survey - comparison of two groups: with and without preoperative ascites drainage.
7 days
Changes in patients' quality of life.
Time Frame: 7 days
To note any changes in quality of life evaluated with standardized quality of life questionnaire.
7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of adverse events concerned with indwelling catheter insertion.
Time Frame: 7 days
Number of adverse events concerned with catheter insertion for ascites drainage.
7 days
Number of participants correctly diagnosed with ovarian cancer based on ascitic fluid cytology.
Time Frame: 1 day
Ascitis fluid collected for cytology examination. The accuracy of ascitic fluid cytology in diagnosing ovarian cancer.
1 day
Changes in Extracellular Fluid (ECF) and Intracellular Fluid (ICF).
Time Frame: 7 days
Changes in body fluid balance measured with bioimpedance analysis tools and defined with ECF and ICF. Parameters will be recorded at randomization, before surgery, and during the 1st hour of the anesthesia.
7 days
Changes in Phase Angle (PA).
Time Frame: 7 days
Changes in nutritional status measured with bioimpedance analysis tools and defined with PA. Parameters will be recorded at randomisation and before the surgery.
7 days
Changes in prealbumin concentration.
Time Frame: 7 days
Changes in nutritional status measured with prealbumin plasma concentration.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maciej Stukan, MD, PhD, Gdynia Oncology Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Systematic ascites evacuation

Subscribe