The "PC-LIGHT" Study

March 21, 2024 updated by: Lisa M. Wu, Northwestern University

Systematic Light Exposure to Prevent Fatigue in Prostate Cancer Patients

Fatigue due to cancer and its treatment (for example, radiation therapy) can interfere with quality of life and can linger long after treatment has ended, yet research examining preventative approaches has produced limited clinical benefit. The proposed study will provide information about systematic light exposure for the prevention of fatigue in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy and will investigate how it works. This study would facilitate the development of this potential preventative treatment, giving health care providers and cancer survivors a much-needed tool to help with cancer-related fatigue.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Univeristy Feinberg School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed with clinical localized prostate cancer,
  • Are about to begin external beam radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer,
  • Are 18 years of age or older,
  • Are able to speak or read English,
  • Have internet access.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of light therapy use (e.g. systematic light exposure),
  • Active infection
  • History of chronic fatigue disorders
  • Confounding underlying medical illnesses such as significant pre-existing anemia (Hb<10 gm/dl)
  • Diagnosed or suspected psychiatric or medical condition that might contribute to fatigue (other than those caused by the cancer or its treatment)
  • Hypothyroidism or documented history of hypothyroidism on thyroid replacement hormone within <3 months of initiating RT
  • History of bipolar disorder or mania
  • History of seasonal affective disorder
  • Diagnosed sleep apnea, restless legs, or other sleep disorders (not including insomnia) known to affect fatigue
  • Use of photosensitizing medication
  • Plans to travel across more than 2 time zones during the study
  • Shift worker
  • Adults unable to consent, individuals who are not yet adults, pregnant women, and prisoners will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention light
30 minutes of intervention systematic light exposure daily for the course of radiation therapy (approximately 8 weeks).
30 minutes of intervention systematic light exposure daily
Active Comparator: Comparison light
30 minutes of comparison systematic light exposure daily for the course of radiation therapy (approximately 8 weeks).
30 minutes of comparison systematic light exposure daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue FACIT-Fatigue scores
Time Frame: Baseline
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Baseline
Fatigue
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to the 4th week of the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Change from Baseline to the 4th week of the intervention
Fatigue
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to the 8th week of the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Change from Baseline to the 8th week of the intervention
Fatigue
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 2 months after the intervention
FACIT-Fatigue scores
Change from Baseline to 2 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Circadian activity rhythms
Time Frame: Baseline
Actigraphy
Baseline
Circadian activity rhythms
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Actigraphy
During the 4th week of the intervention
Circadian activity rhythms
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Actigraphy
During the 8th week of the intervention
Circadian activity rhythms
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Actigraphy
2 months after the intervention
Sleep quality
Time Frame: Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Baseline
Sleep quality
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
During the 4th week of the intervention
Sleep quality
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
During the 8th week of the intervention
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
2 months after the intervention
Depressed mood
Time Frame: Baseline
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
Baseline
Depressed mood
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
During the 4th week of the intervention
Depressed mood
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
During the 8th week of the intervention
Depressed mood
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Score range is 0 to 60, where higher scores represent more symptomatology present.
2 months after the intervention
Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
Baseline
Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
During the 4th week of the intervention
Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
During the 8th week of the intervention
Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI)
2 months after the intervention
Sexual and urinary functioning
Time Frame: Baseline
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
Baseline
Sexual and urinary functioning
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
During the 4th week of the intervention
Sexual and urinary functioning
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
During the 8th week of the intervention
Sexual and urinary functioning
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
3 items from the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire & 3 items from American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index
2 months after the intervention
Cognitive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline
Neuropsychological tests
Baseline
Cognitive functioning
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Neuropsychological tests
During the 8th week of the intervention
Cognitive functioning
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Neuropsychological tests
2 months after the intervention
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
Baseline
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: During the 4th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."
During the 4th week of the intervention
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients (1, 2, 3). It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
During the 8th week of the intervention
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 2 months after the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). From Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: "The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer patients. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being."with prostate cancer patients (1, 2, 3). It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains: Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being.
2 months after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Credibility/Expectancy
Time Frame: Baseline
Credibility/Expectancy questionnaire. There are two scales used during the questionnaire - (1-9, and 0-100%). A composite score can be calculated for each factor (expectancy and credibility).
Baseline
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: During the 8th week of the intervention
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - General (FACT-TS-G)
During the 8th week of the intervention
Usage of light box
Time Frame: Throughout intervention period (8 weeks)
integrated meter measurement and Litebook log. Length of time light box has been used.
Throughout intervention period (8 weeks)
Chronotype
Time Frame: Baseline
Morningness-eveningness questionnaire. From the item itself: "Scores can range from 4-25. Scores of 7 and below indicate "evening types." Scores of 22 and above indicate "morning types." Scores between 8-21 indicate "intermediate types."
Baseline
BMI
Time Frame: Baseline
BMI table
Baseline
Physical health
Time Frame: Baseline
Goldin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire. From the measure itself: " For the first question, weekly frequencies of strenuous, moderate, and light activities are multiplied by nine, five, and three, respectively. Total weekly leisure activity is calculated in arbitrary units by summing the products of the separate components, as shown in the following formula: Weekly leisure activity score = (9 × Strenuous) + (5 × Moderate) + (3 × Light) The second question is used to calculate the frequency of weekly leisure-time activities pursued "long enough to work up a sweat" (see questionnaire)."
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa M Wu, PhD, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Intervention systematic light exposure

Subscribe