Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images

August 2, 2020 updated by: National Heart Centre Singapore

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Using Three-dimensional Interventricular Septal Curvedness From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images

In this study, study team aim to i) evaluate the accuracy of 3D IVS curvedness for prediction of RV systolic pressure (RVSP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with RHC; ii) evaluate the usefulness of 3D IVS curvedness for predicting the response to vasodilator challenge with RHC, in patients clinically suspected or known to have primary PH.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

1) Pulmonary hypertension Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is manifested as an increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure (i.e., mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg) at rest on right heart catheterization (RHC) (Badesch 2009). It is a complex and multidisciplinary disorder causing restricted flow through the pulmonary arterial circulation due to increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). It can be classified into five groups (Simonneau et al 2004): Group I - Idiopathic PAH, Familial PAH, and PAH associated with collagen vascular disease et al; Group II - PH with left heart disease; Group III - PH associated with lung diseases and/or hypoxemia; Group IV - PH due to chronic thrombotic and/or embolic disease; and Group V - miscellaneous causes of PH. The prognosis of PH is poor. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Registry followed 194 patients with IPAH enrolled at 32 clinical centers from 1981 to 1985 (D'Alonzo et al 1991). The reported median survival rates of 68%, 48% and 34%. Similar results have been reported in Japan, India and Mexico.

Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the current reference standard for diagnosing PH (Galie et al 2009; McLaughlin et al 2009), according to ACCF/AHA expert consensus (McLaughlin et al 2009) and ESC/ERS guidelines (Galie et al 2009). Three hemodynamic measurements are essential from RHC: right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Further, patients with PH undergo RHC to assess clinical response to vasodilator challenge in order to guide therapy. It helps identify patients with better prognosis and patients who could potentially benefit from treatment with calcium channel blockers. A positive acute response is defined as a reduction of pulmonary artery pressure ≥10mmHg and ≤40mmHg. Although RHC plays a pivotal role in PH diagnosis, it is invasive and not without its own inherent risks (Hoeper et al 2006). For these reasons, development of a noninvasive alternative to RHC for diagnosis of PH is paramount.

Noninvasive diagnosis of PH and prediction of response to vasodilator challenge is clinically needed.

Several noninvasive methods for diagnosis of PH have been propounded, the most common being Doppler echocardiography. While routinely used to estimate pulmonary arterial pressure, Doppler measurement of tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity has inherent limitations: (i) the reliance on the visualization of the tricuspid regurgitant jet which is not always detectable, (ii) the fact that peak velocity of the jet may be difficult to measure in the presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation, and (iii) the need for adequate acoustic windows (Hinderliter et al 2003; Hachulla et al 2005). Furthermore, as recently emphasized in the ERS/ESC guideline (Galie et al 2009), estimation of mPAP or PVR must be an integral part of a complete cardiac echocardiographic examination.

It has long been recognized that systolic flattening and abnormal motion of the inter-ventricular septum (IVS), from either echocardiography (King et al 1983; Reisner et al 1994; Ricciardi et al 1999) or cine CMR images (Roeleveld et al 2005; Dellegrottaglie et al 2007; Alunni et al 2010), are signs of increased pulmonary arterial pressures. However, these studies are either qualitative or limited to 2D assessment, relying for analysis on subjective selection of the imaging plane and cardiac cycle phase. In the last 10 years, despite advances in biomedical engineering and computational approaches, no rigorous studies have been undertaken to study the relationship between quantitative 3D IVS shape and PH.

It is well documented that RV dysfunction and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) are associated with increased risk of mortality in PH (van Wolfersen 2007). Study team has recently developed a new method for assessment of RV function in terms of area strain, integrating radial, circumferential and longitudinal deformation (Zhong et al 2012). Therefore, we will also investigate the relationship between RV area strain and exercise capacity in PH.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169609
        • National Heart Centre Singapore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 95 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

30 diagnosed pulmonary hypertension patient will be recruited from primary care clinic and outpatient clinics from the National Heart Centre Singapore.

30 Healthy volunteer control.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study mandated procedure
  • Age 16 years or more.
  • Patient with clinically suspected or known primary PH belonging to one of the Updated Dana Point Clinical Classification Groups (I-IV)
  • No known history of pulmonary hypertension

Exclusion Criteria:

Contraindication to MR examination:

  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Brain aneurysm or clips
  • Electronic implants or prosthesis
  • Eye metal foreign body injury
  • Severe claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Diagnosed Pulmonary Hypertension
Patients will undergo the following studying procedures: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) and 6MWT.
Each patient will also receive 6MWT at cardiovascular rehabilitation and preventive cardiology laboratory. Besides the distance covered in meters or converted measure (such as feet) over 6 minutes, a portable metabolic system is used to measure oxygen uptake during exercise (VO2 testing) for each patient.
MRI uses interaction of the magnetic properties of body tissues with strong magnetic fields to create images; for about 1 hour. Several sets of images are needed. No injection of drug or dye will be used for this procedure.
Healthy Volunteer
Healthy Volunteer will undergo the following studying procedures: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) and 6MWT.
Each patient will also receive 6MWT at cardiovascular rehabilitation and preventive cardiology laboratory. Besides the distance covered in meters or converted measure (such as feet) over 6 minutes, a portable metabolic system is used to measure oxygen uptake during exercise (VO2 testing) for each patient.
MRI uses interaction of the magnetic properties of body tissues with strong magnetic fields to create images; for about 1 hour. Several sets of images are needed. No injection of drug or dye will be used for this procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
First occurrence of cardiovascular event.
Time Frame: 1-Year
1-Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang Zhong, PhD, National Heart Centre Singapore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on 6MWT

Subscribe