Study to Compare Strategies to Improve Detection of Nutritional Disorders in Hospitalized Adults (Compass Project) (CompaS)

November 27, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

The prevalence of malnutrition in hospital is very high (30 percent) with major consequences in terms of morbidity and mortality, generating significant health care costs. The positive impact of its support is demonstrated.

The HAS (French High Sanitary Authority) recommends a screening of all adult hospitalized in the first 48 hours, with no consensus regarding the organization of screening within care services. Various strategies have been implemented. Although this screening is part of the nursing role, old and recent studies show that it is not done systematically and nutritional disorders are largely under-diagnosed and therefore untreated.

The investigators assume that an organization of screening for eating disorders, based on a caregiver dedicated to this activity, improves the indicator IPAQSS (Indicateurs Pour l'Amélioration de la Qualité et de la Sécurité des Soins) which is an indicator for the improvement of the quality and security of care) Screening indicator of nutritional disorders Level 3, compared to an organization "classic" involving the care teams in their entirety. This indicator reflects the care system performance.

In this study, patients will have no intervention. Only the organization of the care staff will be adapted but with no changes on the care of patients?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Undernutrition in the hospital is a public health issue. The impacts of this malnutrition are known , with consequences clearly established on the morbidity, mortality and quality of life. Undernutrition is an independent risk factor for mortality (5). In terms of morbidity, the most frequently reported consequences are infections, postoperative complications (delayed healing, in particular nosocomial infections, risk of pressure ulcers) and pejorative impact on the prognosis of chronic diseases such as respiratory failure , heart and kidney.

Malnutrition therefore affects the length of hospital stays and the burden of care.

Many studies have shown the positive impact of the medical care of malnutrition on morbidity and mortality, whether intervention studies in general hospital population or in specific pathologies.

But there is no systematic screening strategy undernutrition implementation in hospitals.

The investigators assume that the organization of screening for eating disorders based on a caregiver specifically dedicated to this activity, improves the indicator IPAQSS Screening indicator of nutritional disorders level 3 compared with a "classic" organization shared between different actors of care. This indicator reflects the care system performance This organization must advance quickly and significantly the number of patients evaluated nutritionally and help reach a level of completeness close to 100%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

916

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients hospitalized in the department of medicine-surgery-obstetric

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted in medicine-surgery-obstetrics department
  • Patient over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient hospitalized less than 48 hours
  • Patients under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Neuroscience pole
Patient hospitalized in the department of medicine-surgery-obstetric of the neuroscience pole department
Organization of nutrition screening with the help of a caregiver
Respiratory tracts pole
Patient hospitalized in the department of medicine-surgery-obstetric of the respiratory tracts pole department
Classic organization with the training of the department team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of patients responding at the level 3 of IPAQSS criterion
Time Frame: Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery
Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of patients responding at the level 2 of IPAQSS criterion
Time Frame: Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery
Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery
Change of the cost-efficiency
Time Frame: Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery
The cost of hospitalization between the 2 arms will be compared
Before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery
Change of patients responding at the level 3 and level 2 of IPAQSS criterion
Time Frame: 15 months after the surgery
15 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Monelle Bertrand, MD, PhD, Hospital University of Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nutritional Disorder

Clinical Trials on Caregiver dedicated

3
Subscribe