Bedside Inoculation of Ascitic Fluid in Diagnostic Paracentesis

December 9, 2019 updated by: Medical College of Wisconsin

Is Bedside Inoculation of Ascitic Fluid in Diagnostic Paracentesis Associated With a Higher Sensitivity for Positive Cultures? Prospective Observational Trial

This study seeks to determine non inferiority of direct inoculation of ascitic fluid in lab as compared to current culture media standard, bedside inoculation with blood culture bottles.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to validate the principal study that recommends inoculation with blood culture bottles at bedside versus lab inoculation (delayed inoculation) of ascitic fluid in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. This study had a small sample size (29) and goal is to validate results with a larger sample size. The aim of current proposed study is to assess for non inferiority of lab inoculation of ascitic fluid culture versus current standard of blood culture bottles. To achieve 90% power and true sensitivity 95%, goal is to enroll 460 patients within the course of a year or until number of samples is reached, with plan to compare the sensitivity of bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles versus the lab using sterile plate techniques as per current lab culture technique. Unlike previous study, all comers for ascitic fluid collected will be analyzed that are to undergo diagnostic paracentesis.

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient population will include all patients undergoing diagnostic paracentesis comparing standard culture protocol (bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascitic fluid) with an additional culture collected for study arm. Patients will be all comers for diagnostic paracentesis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ascites on ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Consent declined

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control group - blood culture bottles
Standard of care group for control - will inoculate all samples in blood culture bottles for ascitic fluid culture
culture of ascitic fluid in standard culture media of blood culture bottles at bedside and fluid collected for culture in laboratory (study arm).
Study group - sample to lab for culture
Study group - will send a sample of ascitic fluid to lab for inoculation in addition to control sample
culture of ascitic fluid in standard culture media of blood culture bottles at bedside and fluid collected for culture in laboratory (study arm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Growth of bacteria on ascitic fluid culture
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year to complete enrollment of 460 patients
Non inferiority of direct inoculation in laboratory as compared to bedside inoculation with blood culture bottles by comparing growth of bacterial growth between both groups, control and study arm.
through study completion, an average of 1 year to complete enrollment of 460 patients

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to positive ascitic fluid culture
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparing time to positive culture between control and study arm
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ricardo Franco Sadud, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ascites

Clinical Trials on Culture

3
Subscribe