Contingency Management for Meth in South Africa Methamphetamine Abuse in South Africa

May 8, 2019 updated by: Steve Shoptaw, University of California, Los Angeles

Combating Craving With Contingency Management: Neuroplasticity and Methamphetamine Abuse in South Africa

This study will link findings from neuroscience with clinical outcomes using contingency management (CM) to identify changes in brain structure and function that emerge during purely behavioral therapy for methamphetamine (MA) use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will correlate MA-abstinence outcomes from an 8-week program of voucher-based incentives using an escalating schedule for 30 treatment-seeking, MA-dependent individuals with scores on tasks of working memory and assessments of neuropsychological and demographic status. At the beginning and end of the CM program, participants will participate in MRI scans while performing a working memory task and will complete a battery of select neurocognitive and psychological assays to address two specific aims: (1) to determine whether changes in neural function within frontostriatal circuitry from baseline to end of the 8-week CM program are associated with parallel changes in measures of cognitive control and impulsivity and with MA abstinence outcomes and (2) to determine whether structural changes in frontostriatal circuitry over the 8-week CM intervention correspond with neurocognitive, psychological and MA abstinence measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7925
        • Department of Psychiatry at Groote Schuur Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • provide voluntary informed consent
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for MA or amphetamine use disorder
  • provide at least one urine sample positive for MA/amphetamine metabolites during screening (i.e. prior to the commencement of the study).
  • aged 18-45
  • right-handed
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving treatment for stimulant addiction or needing more intensive treatment than outpatient care
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder other than nicotine
  • unable to attend 4+ visits during the 2-week screening period or to complete measures
  • Physical or mental illness that would require intervention that would alter imaging or that would interfere with safe study participation
  • pregnant, claustrophobic, or have metal prostheses, cardiac pacemakers, or metal clips that are incompatible with the scanner
  • HIV positive status
  • unable to comprehend written or spoken English
  • currently taking psychiatric medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Contingency Management
In exchange for consecutive urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence, participants receive increasingly valuable reinforcers.
as described above

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responses to Contingency Management
Time Frame: 8 weeks
urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence
8 weeks
fMRI Measures
Time Frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
measures of resting state connectivity
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stop Signal Task
Time Frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
measure of inhibitory control
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Continuous Performance Task
Time Frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
test of sustained attention
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Stroop
Time Frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
test of inhibitory control
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Balloon Analog Risk Task
Time Frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
measure of risk taking and decision making
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R21CMinSA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared with other investigators following publication of the main paper or 2 years after the last subject completes participation, whichever comes first. Shared data will be stripped of all PHI and potentially personally identifying variables.

Requests should briefly state the concept of interest, provide a brief timeline for analyzing the data and preparing a manuscript, and include a copy of the CV of the investigator making the request and documentation of proof of training in the ethical treatment of human subjects in research.

The concept proposal will be evaluated based on three criteria, including the potential impact or contribution to the research in advancing knowledge; the feasibility of the proposed research; and that the aim of the proposed research will not overlap with any of the aims or planned analyses.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Methamphetamine Abuse

Clinical Trials on Contingency Management

Subscribe