Relevance and Nuisances of Respiratory Rate Alarm Generated by Multi-parametric Monitors in Non Ventilated ICU Patients (FR-REA)

January 31, 2018 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee

Relevance and Possible Nuisances of Respiratory Rate Alarm Generated by Multi-parametric Monitors in Non Ventilated ICU Patients.A Prospective, Monocentric, Observational Study

In ICU setting, a large number of medical devices are attached to patients, generating numerous alarm signals. Several studies have demonstrated that most of these alarms are not clinically relevant and tend to lower the attentiveness of healthcare professional and, in turn, lower patient safety.The aim of the study is to assess the relevance of respiratory rate alarm on a monitoring device in non-ventilated ICU patients.

The investigator primary hypothesis is that this alarm is potentially useless. If this hypothesis is confirmed, a second interventional trial will be conducted on the impact of this alarm removal.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • La roche sur yon, France, 85000
        • CHD Vendée

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to ICU unit at La Roche sur yon Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Patient hospitalized in ICU
  • Need for monitoring

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Non-invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Patient not monitored
  • Patient already included in this study
  • Patient hospitalized without consent and/or deprived of liberty by court's decision
  • Patient under guardianship or curators
  • Lack of social insurance
  • Patient's or next of kin's refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of useful alarms within 2000 patient-monitored hours
Time Frame: through study completion, within 6 months
Number of intervention of healthcare team following a relevant respiratory rate alarm generated by a monitoring device and without any other associated alarm.
through study completion, within 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio of artifact alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
Artifact alarm : monitoring is functional but the measure is false
through study completion within 6 months
Ratio of technical alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
Technical alarm : Alarm leading to a reactivation of the monitoring system.
through study completion within 6 months
Ratio of significant alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
Significant alarm: True alarm triggered by a correct measure
through study completion within 6 months
Number of care activity interrupted by a respiratory rate alarm generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
through study completion within 6 months
Setting of alarms on the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
through study completion within 6 months
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days
Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days
all-cause ICU mortality
Time Frame: Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days ]
Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days ]
Ratio of respiratory rate alarms generated by the monitoring device among all ICU alarms
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
through study completion within 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHD 087-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Ventilated ICU Patients

3
Subscribe