- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02908659
Relevance and Nuisances of Respiratory Rate Alarm Generated by Multi-parametric Monitors in Non Ventilated ICU Patients (FR-REA)
Relevance and Possible Nuisances of Respiratory Rate Alarm Generated by Multi-parametric Monitors in Non Ventilated ICU Patients.A Prospective, Monocentric, Observational Study
In ICU setting, a large number of medical devices are attached to patients, generating numerous alarm signals. Several studies have demonstrated that most of these alarms are not clinically relevant and tend to lower the attentiveness of healthcare professional and, in turn, lower patient safety.The aim of the study is to assess the relevance of respiratory rate alarm on a monitoring device in non-ventilated ICU patients.
The investigator primary hypothesis is that this alarm is potentially useless. If this hypothesis is confirmed, a second interventional trial will be conducted on the impact of this alarm removal.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
La roche sur yon, France, 85000
- CHD Vendée
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18 years
- Patient hospitalized in ICU
- Need for monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
- Invasive mechanical ventilation
- Non-invasive mechanical ventilation
- Patient not monitored
- Patient already included in this study
- Patient hospitalized without consent and/or deprived of liberty by court's decision
- Patient under guardianship or curators
- Lack of social insurance
- Patient's or next of kin's refusal
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of useful alarms within 2000 patient-monitored hours
Time Frame: through study completion, within 6 months
|
Number of intervention of healthcare team following a relevant respiratory rate alarm generated by a monitoring device and without any other associated alarm.
|
through study completion, within 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Ratio of artifact alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
Artifact alarm : monitoring is functional but the measure is false
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
Ratio of technical alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
Technical alarm : Alarm leading to a reactivation of the monitoring system.
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
Ratio of significant alarms among all alarms generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
Significant alarm: True alarm triggered by a correct measure
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
Number of care activity interrupted by a respiratory rate alarm generated by the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
|
Setting of alarms on the monitoring device
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
|
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days
|
Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
all-cause ICU mortality
Time Frame: Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days ]
|
Until discharge from ICU, an expected average of 7 days ]
|
|
Ratio of respiratory rate alarms generated by the monitoring device among all ICU alarms
Time Frame: through study completion within 6 months
|
through study completion within 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHD 087-16
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non Ventilated ICU Patients
-
Shaare Zedek Medical CenterUnknownMechanically Ventilated ICU PatientsIsrael
-
Tufts Medical CenterWithdrawnMechanically Ventilated ICU PatientsUnited States
-
Mohamed Sayed Mohamed AbbasCompletedICU Patients Dependant on Mechanical Ventilation : Safest Mode of Performing Percutaneous Tracheostomy Among ICU Ventilated Unweanable Patients
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire BrugmannUnknown
-
University of ChicagoCompletedMechanically Ventilated ICU PatientsUnited States
-
Université de SherbrookeCentre de Recherche Clinique CHUSUnknownMechanically Ventilated ICU Patients | Sedative Drug ConsumptionCanada
-
Hopital of MelunCompletedCritical Ill Patients | Ventilated PatientsFrance
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknown
-
ArcheonRecruitingMechanically Ventilated PatientsFrance