Subchondral Perfusion Mapping Using Indocyanin Green Laser (ICG)

January 6, 2020 updated by: Lee Zuckerman, MD, Loma Linda University

Differential Subchondral Perfusion Mapping Using Indocyanin Green Laser Angiography

Laser Angiography using indocyanin green (ICG) is a relatively new technique and has been utilized to assess the viability of soft tissue, most prominently in the general surgery and plastic surgery literature. This technique has been used for prediction of soft tissue viability by assessing the perfusion status. There is currently no Orthopaedic literature regarding the use of this device for assessment of subchondral perfusion of articular surfaces such as the distal femur or other chondral surfaces.

In this pilot study, the use of ICG to detect the perfusion status of a distal femur and proximal tibia during a surgical approach to the knee and correlating this to visible signs of arthritis. For example, due to the difference visible with ICG angiography correlate to gross changes in the cartilage health visible to the naked eye with radiographic imaging.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ICG has been FDA registered since 1959 and is a negatively charged, water-soluble, tricarbocyanine. It binds readily to plasma proteins after injection with almost exclusive bile excretion, and possesses an extremely low toxicity profile. In plasma, ICG has an absorption peak around 807 nm and an emission peak around 822 nm, both within the infrared range. ICG has a short half-life of 150-180 seconds, making multiple administrations possible intra-operatively. It is given intravenously during administration1-4. After it is given through an IV, it is rapidly distributed throughout the circulatory system. When a light of a specific wavelength interacts with the dye, the dye fluoresces in the near-infrared range, which can be acquired by a special camera.

In daily practice, both visualization and palpation are used to provide information about the health of articular cartilage, be it through arthroscopy or open treatment. However, real time assessment of cartilage viability and subchondral perfusion has not been available. Determination of the perfusion status of cartilage surfaces via intra-operative modalities may provide valuable information diagnostically, as well as guide therapeutic intervention. Some possible uses for this technology may be diagnosing and treating osteochondral defects, predicting future osteoarthritis, delineating or predicting areas of avascular necrosis, or use in oncologic surgery. It is currently thought that because this dye currently works extremely well in the soft tissue literature, this will directly translate to being able to accurately assess subchondral bone perfusion.

The incidence of symptomatic knee arthritis in the United States approaches 50% of the population by the time the patient turns 85 and has been shown to significantly impact a patient's quality of life. In 2003, the United States spent $128 billion on arthritis expenditures. Arthritis can be described as the degeneration, or absence of, healthy cartilage. The current way to intra-operatively assess cartilage viability is through inspection and palpation, although this is obviously not always indicative of the overall health of the cartilage. Although an MRI may be obtained pre-operatively showing similar information, this is costly and does not provide the same information that can be assessed intra-operatively. Furthermore, an MRI does not provide information on the perfusion status of the cartilage.

It is our belief that this imaging modality will provide valuable information diagnostically and be able to guide surgical decision making regarding treatments for patients. For example, prior to undergoing a unicompartmental knee replacement, if a patient is found to have degenerative changes of the other compartments, the surgeon may convert to a total knee arthroplasty. If a patient has an osteochondral defect, knowing the perfusion status may provide information on whether to reconstruct the defect with an allograft or drill the defect. A patient undergoing a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty may benefit from knowing if the posterior cruciate ligament is pathologic, leading to a posterior stabilized knee replacement. For a patient with avascular necrosis, valuable prognostic information on the viability of their cartilage may help determine if joint preserving surgery is possible. The use of intra-operative ICG may have an impact on intra-operative decision making as the perfusion observed may predict the overall health of structures we currently have no way of assessing in real-time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Healthcare Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing elective orthopedic intervention in which the distal femoral or proximal tibial articular surface is visualized through arthroscopic or open technique
  • Patients not meeting exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Iodine allergy
  • Intolerance to indocyanine green dye
  • Active infection at surgical site
  • Known pregnancy
  • Inability to comprehend consent process
  • Age <18 or > 89
  • Significant blood loss risk without tourniquet inflation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Indocyanin Green Dye (ICG)
Once the patient is in the operating room, the operative intervention will take proceed as current standard protocol dictates for the described procedure. No changes in operative technique will be undertaken apart from injection of the dye and visualization with the camera. After the articular surface of the distal femur or proximal tibia has been exposed, 2.5 mg of indocyanin green will be injected intravenously by anesthetist through a pre-existing IV line outside the sterile field. The operating surgeon will grade 6 locations on a standard scale of chondromalacia or cartilage damage.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differential Subchondral Perfusion Mapping using Indocyanin Green Laser Angiography
Time Frame: 15 months

Visible grade of chondromalacia from the 6 points mentioned above.

  • Video will be acquired using the Spy Elite or Pinpoint system of the distal femur or proximal tibial surface. Currently, the software with the SPY elite is able to quantify the degree of dye uptake, and this dye uptake number from the 6 points will also be recorded.
  • Video data will be given a key that corresponds to the subject, thus no videos will be labelled with patient data or information chondromalacia ondromalacia from the 6 points mentioned above.
  • Video will be acquired using the Spy Elite or Pinpoint system of the distal femur or proximal tibial surface. Currently, the software with the SPY elite is able to quantify the degree of dye uptake, and this dye uptake number from the 6 points will also be recorded.
  • Video data will be given a key that corresponds to the subject, thus no videos will be labelled with patient data or information
15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee Zuckerman, MD, Loma Linda University Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5160045

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Surgery

Clinical Trials on Indocyanin Green Dye (ICG)

3
Subscribe