FH ORTHO SAS Knee Observatory

February 21, 2024 updated by: FH ORTHO

Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Knee Surgery Using FH ORTHO SAS Medical Devices (FH ORTHO SAS Knee Observatory)

The objective of this observatory is to generate additional real life clinical data in accordance with local regulation (i.e. Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, a study carried out following the European Conformity (CE) marking of a device and intended to answer specific questions relating to clinical safety or performance (i.e. residual risks) of a device when used in accordance with its approved instructions for use (IFU).

The difficulty of such an observatory is to be able to collect data on the different versions of the devices, on the different possible combinations of implants of an knee arthroplasty. The observatory must also be able to cover devices used in ligament reconstruction surgery.

The observatory will be based on the principle of a "dynamic" cohort during the inclusion period, i.e. with possible inclusions to replace the premature exits.

Technical solutions will be implemented to facilitate data collection from surgeons (electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and from patients (Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) on smartphone/tablet/computer) when feasible.

The data to be collected and the different follow-up times are based on our state-of-the-art, clinical evaluation plans and clinical evaluation reports.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

PMCF as part of CE mark renewal, to answer questions related to the safety and clinical performance of the devices, when used according to their approved instructions for use.

This is an European, prospective and retrospective, multicenter, non-comparative study.

Randomization is considered impossible due to surgeon preference, anatomical conditions and other patient factors, and the use of different techniques.

This observatory is non-comparative, due to the absence of a gold standard and the technical, logistical and contractual constraints involved.

This PMCF study (CE-marked MD, any class, used as intended) provide additional non-burdensome and non-invasive procedures.

The Observatory will therefore be based on the principle of a "dynamic" cohort, i.e. with possible exits and inclusions throughout the Observatory period.

The aim of this methodology is to have a sufficient number of patients to be able to carry out descriptive statistical analyses each year, and to be able to calculate the evaluation criteria with the longest possible follow-up of results. Data will be collected before surgery, during surgery and at follow-up visits. Data collection will focus on obtaining short- and long-term data for performance and safety evaluation (up to 20 years for knee arthroplasty prostheses; up to 5 years for knee ligament reconstruction devices). In the case of knee arthroplasty, it is recommended to have performance and safety data at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-up, as well as safety data at 15 and 20 years if possible. In the case of ligament reconstruction, it is recommended to have performance and safety data at 1 and 2 years, as well as safety data at 5 years. The platform will be able to send automatic notifications to surgeons to remind them of scheduled patient follow-ups, missing data, and encourage them to include new patients if necessary. Self-questionnaires will be completed by patients via a web-based platform, available on computer or smartphone/tablet. Alternatively, patients will complete paper self-questionnaires, which will then be entered into the database by the investigating team.

It will also be possible to arrange for direct telephone contact with patients by an independent structure guaranteeing non-dissemination of nominative data (e.g. CRO). Telephone contact can also be made if the patient is geographically remote or has difficulty travelling. Patient recruitment: Continuous, consecutive, prospective and retrospective (for some implants because few implants have been used for this condition) recruitment to guarantee a minimum number of patients per type of device. Individual written information for each patient will be mandatory. A signed patient consent form will be required in Europe, after sufficient time for reflection.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

487

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beaumont, France, 63541
        • Clinique De La Chataigneraie
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles CASIN, MD
      • Belfort, France, 90002
        • Clinique De La Miotte
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre Bastien REY, MD
      • Boujan-sur-Libron, France, 34760
        • Polyclinique St Privat
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume MIROUSE, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Olivier BRINGER, MD
      • Ecully, France, 69130
        • Clinique du Val d'Ouest
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benoît GIRAUD, MD
      • Garches, France, 92380
        • C.H. Raymond Poincare
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean-Claude BOU, MD
      • Saint Gregoire, France, 35768
        • Hôpital Prive St Grégoire
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles Kajetanek, MD
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Nazaire, France, 44615
        • Polyclinique de l'Europe
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xavier CLÉMENT, MD
      • Toulouse, France, 31036
        • Médipôle Garonne
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rodolphe LIMOZIN, MD
      • Vannes, France, 56000
        • Hôpital Privé Océane

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patient population will be representative of the target population of the medical devices.

The aim is to recruit in the first 3 years in 15-20 sites in France, 487 patients who have benefited from knee arthroplasty or ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Arthroplasty arm: Knee prostheses are intended for patients suffering from functionally serious diseases of the knee causing daily disability that is insufficiently improved by medical treatment (Knee osteoarthrosis, Osteonecrosis of the knee, Inflammatory disease, or Patellofemoral arthritis).

Ligament reconstruction arm: Ligament reconstruction surgery should be considered for patient who have undergone a rupture of the anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligaments requiring partial or total reconstruction.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient undergoing or having undergone implantation of medical devices distributed by FH ORTHO SAS for knee arthroplasty and ligament reconstruction, used in accordance with their approved IFU, in one of the centers participating in the Observatory.
  • Patient is at least 18 years old at the time of surgery
  • Patient agreeing to participate after having been informed orally and in writing (with written consent if required locally)
  • In some countries, such as France, the patient will have to be socially insured to be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

For Arthroplasty:

  1. Infection, or latent infection
  2. A mental or neuromuscular disorder that might create an unacceptable risk of instability, prosthetic fixation failure, or complications after surgery
  3. Insufficient bone stock for proper implant fixation
  4. It is the surgeon's responsibility to make sure that the patient does not have any known allergies to one of the compounds of the material listed on the product label.
  5. Metabolic diseases that might compromise bone regrowth
  6. Drug addiction
  7. Incomplete bone growth

For Ligament reconstruction:

  1. Infection, or latent infection
  2. A mental or neuromuscular disorder that might create an unacceptable risk of instability, prosthetic fixation failure, or complications after surgery
  3. Insufficient bone stock
  4. Known allergies to one of the compounds of the material listed on the product label.
  5. Metabolic diseases that might compromise bone regrowth
  6. Uncooperative patient unable to follow recommendations

As the medical devices are used in real life according to their indications, pregnant or breastfeeding women are not excluded from the study, but for safety reasons it is not advisable to include them in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Arthroplasty

Knee prostheses are intended for patients suffering from functionally serious diseases of the knee causing daily disability that is insufficiently improved by medical treatment.

The functional diseases are among:

  • Knee osteoarthrosis
  • Osteonecrosis of the knee
  • Inflammatory disease
  • Patellofemoral arthritis

The patients having benefited from an arthroplasty will be followed for at least 15 years (until 20 years).

This clinical investigation is a real-life observatory designed to collect long-term clinical data on patients who have undergone knee joint replacement or knee ligament reconstruction.

In this type of intervention, one or more medical devices distributed by FH ORTHO SAS may be used by surgeons.

Ligament reconstruction

Ligament reconstruction surgery should be considered for patient who have undergone a rupture of the anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligaments requiring partial or total reconstruction.

The patients having benefited from a ligament reconstruction will be followed for at least 5 years.

This clinical investigation is a real-life observatory designed to collect long-term clinical data on patients who have undergone knee joint replacement or knee ligament reconstruction.

In this type of intervention, one or more medical devices distributed by FH ORTHO SAS may be used by surgeons.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revision rate
Time Frame: 2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years
Evaluate the revision rate at the longest follow-up possible for arthroplasty arm
2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years
Revision rate
Time Frame: 2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Evaluate the revision rate at the longest follow-up possible for ligament reconstruction arm
2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Knee Society (IKS 2011) score
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years

Mobility, Pain and Function for Arthroplasty arm.

It includes a 100-point objective score and a subjective score made up of 3 domains evaluating satisfaction on 40 points, patient expectations on 15 points using different items between the pre- and post-operative phases, as well as functional activities on 100 points. The total score was 255 points. There are no levels and the results are expressed as raw scores. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Pre-operative, 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) score
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years

Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm

This self-questionnaire is divided into three parts (symptoms, sporting activities, function) and gives a score between 0 (worst) and 100 (best). This score is interpreted as a measure of functional capacity, with the highest scores representing the best levels of function and the lowest levels representing symptoms. A score of 100 means that there are no limits to daily activities and sports and that symptoms are non-existent.

Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years

Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm The Lysholm Knee Score is a questionnaire that the patient completes with the therapist. The questionnaire is designed to assess the degree of knee instability, in terms of both impairment and limitation.

The Lysholm Knee Score calculates and rates an overall score from 0 to 100 based on 8 domains: squatting, locking, pain, stair climbing, weight bearing, instability and oedema. Doctors use this condition-specific subjective outcome score to assess a patient's progress after knee surgery or injury. Scores between 95 and 100 are considered exceptional, those between 84 and 94 acceptable, those between 65 and 83 fair and those below 65 poor.

Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years
Tegner activity level scale
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years

Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm

The Tegner activity scale is a numerical scale with values ranging from 0 to 10, each representing a different activity. A person is considered to have an activity level of 10 if they play highly competitive sports such as rugby, football and soccer. A person who plays the above sports recreationally is considered to have an activity level of 6. A person with knee problems who is on sick leave or receiving a disability pension is considered to have an activity level of 0.

Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years
Knee laxity (clinical section)
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 3-6 months

Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm.

This questionnaire is completed by the physician. He will assessed laxity of operated knee, as:

Pivot Shift test: absent (0), grade 1 (+), grade 2 (++), grade 3 (+++).

Pre-operative, 3-6 months
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years

for arthroplasty arm Pain rating scale. A straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the pain to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).

The scale is given to the patient during the consultation, the patient indicates his/her level of pain and the surgeon then transcribes the score.

1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

for ligament reconstruction arm Pain rating scale. A straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the pain to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).

The scale is given to the patient during the consultation, the patient indicates his/her level of pain and the surgeon then transcribes the score.

1 year, 2 years, 5 years
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)-score
Time Frame: Pre-operative

The American Society of Anesthesiologists proposes five classes of patients requiring anaesthesia.

Class 1: patient in good health. Class 2: patient with moderate general illness. Class 3: patient with a serious but not incapacitating general illness. Class 4: patient with a life-threatening general illness. Class 5: a moribund patient who would not survive 24 hours without the procedure, the outcome of which is uncertain.

Pre-operative
Complications/Adverse events
Time Frame: During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
any adverse events leading or not to re-intervention (with or without change of the implant), including device malfunctions
During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
Complications/Adverse events
Time Frame: During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Any adverse events leading or not to re-intervention (with or without change of the implant), including device malfunctions
During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
A simple questionnaire consisting of 3 questions will be proposed to the patient. The 2 first one will be to graduate the satisfaction regarding the mobility and the pain of the operated knee and the last one is the yes/No question regarding the surgery reiteration.
3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
X-ray
Time Frame: 3-6months
check the position of the prosthesis using medical imaging. Desired position: Yes or No
3-6months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles KAJETANEK, MD, Hôpitaux Privés Rennais - Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé) Institut Locomoteur de l'Ouest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2044

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2044

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Surgery

Clinical Trials on Knee surgery with FH Ortho devices

3
Subscribe