Delivery Optimization for Antiretroviral Therapy (The DO ART Study) (DO ART)

October 27, 2020 updated by: Ruanne Barnabas, University of Washington

Delivery Optimization for Antiretrovial Therapy (The DO ART Study): A Prospective, Interventional, Randomized Study of Community-based ART Initiation, Delivery, and Monitoring in South Africa and Uganda

The investigators propose the Delivery Optimization for Antiretroviral Therapy Study - The DO ART Study - a prospective randomized study of strategies to optimize community-based ART initiation, monitoring and resupply among HIV-positive persons in South Africa and Uganda. The investigators will work closely with community members, stakeholders, local providers, and the local Department of Health (DoH) to integrate the community-based ART delivery with HIV clinics, pharmacies and labs. Following community sensitization, participants will be recruited through community-based HTC and HIV clinics. HIV-positive persons not engaged in care will receive point-of-care CD4 testing to determine ART eligibility. HIV-positive persons who are eligible for ART by national guidelines will be randomized to one of three ART delivery arms: (i) Home ART initiation and mobile van ART monitoring and resupply, (ii) Hybrid model with clinic ART initiation and mobile van ART monitoring and resupply, and (iii) Clinic ART initiation, monitoring and resupply - the current standard of care (SOC)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has tremendous potential to prevent HIV-associated morbidity, mortality and transmission. With reliable ART supply and monitoring, the life expectancy of HIV-positive persons in southern Africa is comparable to that of HIV-negative persons. However, HIV-associated mortality continues to be high among HIV-positive persons not diagnosed and not engaged in care. Of the 35 million persons worldwide who meet WHO (World Health Organization) guidelines for ART, only 15 million are on ART. For already burdened health care systems faced with more than doubling of persons on ART, effective and efficient ART initiation and monitoring strategies are needed. First line ART regimens are once daily oral regimens and well-tolerated, which increases the simplicity of ART delivery in general, including community-based ART delivery a feasible alternative to clinic-based delivery. A priority for optimization of ART delivery is to directly compare and evaluate the impact and cost of community-based ART initiation and resupply to clinic delivery of ART in high prevalence settings in Africa, in order to expand capacity to provide ART coverage.

The investigators have extensive experience with community-based strategies for HIV testing and linkage to care. In a series of studies, the investigators have demonstrated that community-based HIV testing and counseling (HTC) results in >90% knowledge of serostatus and similarly high linkage rates for HIV-positive persons to HIV care. However, the investigators observed bottlenecks within HIV clinics that resulted in delays in ART initiation, particularly for those with higher CD4 counts; only 59% of HIV-positive ART eligible persons were virally suppressed at 12 months, far below the UNAIDS target of 80%. Those findings suggest that community-based strategies for ART initiation and maintenance could address clinic inefficiencies and patient opportunity costs and barriers to optimize ART delivery.

South Africa and Uganda plan to provide decentralized services, including community health workers, CHWs, (known as community health extension workers, CHEWs, in Uganda) conducting HTC and linkage to care and local pharmacy pick-up locations for medication, to meet the challenge of scaling up ART. The investigators proposed Delivery Optimization for Antiretroviral Therapy (The DO ART Study). A rigorous evaluation of an innovative, decentralized ART optimization strategy to safely and cost-effectively deliver ART and monitor viral suppression among HIV-positive persons in South Africa and Uganda. Using a prospective individually-randomized design, the investigators will compare home ART initiation and local mobile van ART resupply to clinic centered care among HIV-positive persons in South Africa and Uganda. Following community sensitization, participants will be recruited through community-based HTC and HIV clinics. HIV-positive persons who are eligible for ART by national guidelines will be randomized to one of three ART delivery arms: (i) Home ART initiation and mobile van ART monitoring and resupply, (ii) A hybrid model of clinic ART initiation with mobile van ART monitoring and resupply, and (iii) Clinic ART initiation, monitoring and resupply - the standard of care (SOC).

The co-primary outcomes are 1) the proportion of HIV-positive persons who initiate ART and achieve viral suppression and 2) cost per HIV-positive person with suppressed HIV viral load at 12 months. The secondary outcomes are safety, social harms, acceptability, the cost-effectiveness of community-based ART delivery, and understanding qualitatively the drivers of engagement in care.

The investigators hypothesize that community-based ART initiation will be acceptable, efficient and improve outcomes, specifically with prompter ART initiation and a higher proportion of HIV-positive persons achieving viral suppression, compared to the standard clinic ART delivery model. Decentralizing HIV care for asymptomatic individuals will expand the overall capacity of the health system to provide care for HIV-positive persons using the existing clinical infrastructure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1539

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kwa-Zulu Natal
      • Sweetwaters, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa
        • HSRC Sweetwaters
    • Bushenyi
      • Kabwohe, Bushenyi, Uganda
        • ICOBI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Reside in the study community for the duration of follow-up
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • HIV positive and eligible to start ART according to national guidelines
  • Not pregnant
  • Normal renal function
  • Not receiving treatment for active tuberculosis or other opportunistic infections

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No separate exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home ART initiation
Participants who are eligible to initiate ART will start in the home and will pick up their medication refills from a mobile van.
Participants initiate ART use in the home without visiting a clinic
Participants will pick up their medication refills from the mobile van and have all clinical monitoring conducted in the mobile van.
Experimental: Hybrid model
Participants will be referred to the clinic to initiate ART, once started they will pick up their medication refills from a mobile van.
Participants will pick up their medication refills from the mobile van and have all clinical monitoring conducted in the mobile van.
Participants are referred to the clinic to initiate ART use
Active Comparator: Clinic ART initiation, monitoring and resupply
This is the standard of care arm. Participants will be given a referral to the clinic to initiate ART and will pick up their medication refills from the clinic.
Participants are referred to the clinic to initiate ART use
Participants will return to the clinic for ART refill and clinical monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV viral suppression at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 Months
Maximize, through community-based ART initiation and maintenance, the proportion of HIV-positive ART eligible persons who achieve viral suppression at 12 months
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of safety across study arms
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Compare the rates of clinical adverse events across study arms.
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Estimate cost-effectiveness of each arm
Time Frame: 12 months
Estimate the cost-effectiveness for community-based ART initiation compared to clinic-based programs, using mathematical models and study results.
12 months
Qualitative review
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Use qualitative methods to assess "how" and "why" community-based strategies of ART initiation, re-supply and monitoring impact viral suppression and other study outcomes.
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Minimize the cost of achieving viral suppression
Time Frame: 12 months
Minimize the cost per HIV-positive person achieving viral suppression and retention in the continuum of HIV care through community-based strategies compared to clinic standard of care
12 months
Measurement of social harms
Time Frame: 12 months
Compare the rates of reported social harms across study arms.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruanne Barnabas, MBChB, DPhil, Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 50607

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on ART initiation in the home

3
Subscribe