Epicardial Approach in Recurred Atrial Fibrillation (EPIREAF)

November 16, 2020 updated by: Young-Hoon Kim, MD, Korea University Anam Hospital

Role of Epicardial Mapping and Ablation for Redo Procedure in Patients With Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Prospective Randomized Trial

We aimed to assess the benefit of epicardial mapping and ablation in patients with recurred atrial tachyarrhythmias after single procedure for atrial fibrillation. We hypothesize that both endocardial and epicardial approach is superior to only endocardial approach with regards to clinical recurrence. Participants are randomized into a hybrid approach or an endocardial approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Atrial electrical activity during atrial fibrillation depends on the distribution of myocardial tissue. Circumferential and longitudinal muscular bundles are multi-level crossing across the entire thickness of atrial wall. At radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, transmural lesions are important to reduce the arrhythmogenic substrates and to prevent recurrence of scar-related atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Radiofrequency ablation applying electric current depends on impedance between patch and the tip electrode of a catheter. Increased impedance results in increased tissue heating, following an irreversible damage. However, overheating limits to create deep lesion formation because an increased impedance impedes the energy delivery to tissue. Furthermore, prolonged ablation time may result in severe complications, such as steam pop, cardiac perforation, and char formation. Therefore, both endocardial and epicardial ablations may be more effective to create a transmural lesion compared with only endocardial ablation.

Organized atrial tachycardia is common in patient who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation. Activation mapping for atrial tachycardia is critical for ablating an isthmus. However, when the amplitude of endocardial potentials after previous ablations is decreased as system does not detect, summation of data from endocardium may give us wrong information about atrial tachycardia. Data from epicardial potential during tachycardia may be helpful to terminate a tachycardia.

We aimed to assess the benefit of epicardial mapping and ablation in patients with recurred atrial tachyarrhythmias after single procedure for atrial fibrillation. We hypothesize that both endocardial and epicardial approach is superior to only endocardial approach with regards to clinical recurrence. Participants are randomized into a hybrid approach or an endocardial approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02841
        • Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with persistent AF (AF episode lasting > 7 days)
  • Patients with symptomatic AF that is refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication
  • Patients with recurrent arrhythmia after prior catheter ablation
  • Patients undergoing a repeat ablation procedure for AF
  • At least one episode of AF must have been documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 2 years of enrollment in this investigation
  • Patients must be able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in this investigation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with permanent AF;
  • Permanent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting more than 1 years and sinus rhythm never be observed .
  • Patients for whom cardioversion or sinus rhythm will never be attempted/pursued;
  • Patients with AF felt to be secondary to an obvious reversible cause
  • Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or warfarin or a direct thrombin inhibitor;
  • Moderate to severe valvular disease
  • Patients who are pregnant. Pregnancy will be assessed by patients informing the physicians.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treated
hybrid approach (epicardial and subsequent endocardial mappings and ablations)
Before transseptal puncture, epicardial puncture is performed through subxyphoid approach. Atrial epicardial potentials are recorded using multi-electrode catheter, leading an activation map for atrial tachycardia and map for continuous fractionated atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation. Endocardial potentials are also recorded in the same fashion. Procedural endpoint is a tachycardia termination or a noninducibility of tachycardia.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
conventional endocardial approach
Atrial endocardial potentials are recorded using multi-electrode catheter, leading an activation map for atrial tachycardia and map for continuous fractionated atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation. Procedural endpoint is a tachycardia termination or a noninducibility of tachycardia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from AF/AT recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
Freedom from sustained AF/AT recurrence Sustained AF/AT: sustained more than 30 sec documentation in clinical electrocardiography, Holter, event recorder
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from AF/AT recurrence without anti-arrhythmic drug use
Time Frame: 12 months
Freedom from sustained AF/AT recurrence without anti-arrhythmic drug use
12 months
Freedom from AF recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
Freedom from sustained AF recurrence
12 months
Freedom from AT recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
Freedom from sustained AT recurrence
12 months
Procedure Time
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
From skin to skin
Immediately after procedure
Fluoroscopic Time
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Fluoroscopic Time
Immediately after procedure
Ablation Time
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Ablation Time
Immediately after procedure
Procedure-related Acute Complications
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Procedure-related Acute Complications
Immediately after procedure
Procedure-related Subacute Complications
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
Procedure-related Subacute Complications
3 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young-Hoon Kim, MD, PhD, Korea University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 29, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data is not available to share with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on hybrid approach

Subscribe