Comparison of Low Volume PEG-Asc and Lower Volume PEG-Asc With Bisacodyl

December 1, 2016 updated by: Seung Hun Kang, Korea University Anam Hospital

Comparison of a Split Dose Bowel Preparation With 2-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 1-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and Bisacodyl Prior to Colonoscopy

Recently a low-volume polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) formulation has proven as safe and effective as traditional 4-L PEG solutions for colonoscopy preparation. However, currently available aqueous purgative formulations are poorly tolerated. The aim of this study was to compare a split-dose 2-L PEG-Asc and a 1-L PEG-Asc with bisacodyl (10 mg) formulation to determine the quality of bowel cleansing and patient tolerability.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

- Study design A single center, randomized, comparative observer-blinded study was performed from May 2015 to September 2015 at the Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy at Korea University Anam Hospital (Seoul, Korea).

In total, 200 outpatients received lower volume 1-L PEG with ascorbic acid plus bisacodyl (1L-PEG/AB) or low volume 2-L PEG with ascorbic acid (2L-PEG/A) in a 1:1 ratio.

At the time of registration, subjects were randomly allocated to either group. They were randomized by a computer-generated list and were provided with written instructions. All patients provided written informed consent.

  • Patients All patients between the ages of 20 and 75 years. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they had known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, Ileus, severe heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure > 170 mmHg, diastolic pressure > 100 mmHg), severe constipation, clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities, any prior bowel resection, or significant gastroparesis.
  • Bowel preparation In the 2L-PEG/A group, 1 L of PEG containing ascorbic acid was taken at 8:00 pm on the day before the colonoscopy, followed by an extra 500 mL of water. The second 1-L of PEG containing ascorbic acid was taken 4 h before the colonoscopy examination, with an additional 500 mL of water. Each liter of preparation and the extra 500 mL water had to be consumed within 2 h of the procedure.

The 1L-PEG/AB group received 10 mg bisacodyl at 9:00 pm on the day before the colonoscopy. Four hours before the colonoscopy examination, 1 L of PEG containing ascorbic acid was taken, followed by an additional 1 L of water. The preparation was completed 2 h before the examination. All colonoscopies were performed between 9 am and 1 pm.

- Assessment by endoscopists Colonoscopies were performed by two expert endoscopists who were blinded to the preparation regimen. These two endoscopists worked for more than 5 years at our institution.

Bowel cleansing was scored by the same endoscopist performing the colonoscopy. To assess the cleansing quality of the bowel preparations, the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and the Aronchick Bowel Preparation Scale (ABPS) were used.

- Assessment of patient tolerability and adverse events Before the colonoscopy procedure, patients completed questionnaires about their symptoms associated with the preparations to assess tolerability. Patients were asked to assess the degree of abdominal fullness, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, sleep disturbances, and general discomfort using a 5-point scale (i.e., none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe).

The palatability of the preparation was graded in 5 categories: very good, good, acceptable, disgusting, and bad.

- Sample size and statistical analysis A sample size of at least 89 patients group was required for each treatment group to detect a difference in treatment success of a 5% type-I error rate and 80% power for a two-tailed χ2 test. Our sample size was based on the results from a pilot study that was conducted in our hospital and included 35 patients in each group. It was estimated that the efficacy for excellent treatment success would be 49% with PEG-2L/A and 30% with PEG-1L/AB. Based on these data, we decided to collect 100 patients per treatment group for study.

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and discontinuous variables were expressed as counts and percentages. SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, US) was used for data entry and statistical analyses. For the analyses between the two treatment groups, Students t-test as appropriate was used to compare continuous variables and either the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used for categorical data. The p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients between the ages of 20 and 75 years who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • aged more than 75 years.
  • known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, Ileus
  • severe heart failure
  • uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure > 170 mmHg, diastolic pressure > 100 mmHg)
  • severe constipation
  • clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities
  • any prior bowel resection, or significant gastroparesis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2L Polyethylene glycols-Asc
1 L of PEG containing ascorbic acid (PEG A) was taken at 8:00 pm on the day before the colonoscopy, followed by an extra 500 mL of water. The second 1-L of PEG containing ascorbic acid was taken 4 h before the colonoscopy examination, with an additional 500 mL of water. Each liter of preparation and the extra 500 mL water had to be consumed within 2 h of the procedure. All colonoscopies were performed between 9 am and 1 pm.
(Split dose 2L PEG-Asc)
Other Names:
  • Coolprep®; Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1L PEG-Asc plus bisacodyl
10 mg bisacodyl at 9:00 pm on the day before the colonoscopy. Four hours before the colonoscopy examination, 1 L of PEG containing ascorbic acid was taken, followed by an additional 1 L of water. The preparation was completed 2 h before the examination. All colonoscopies were performed between 9 am and 1 pm.
(1L PEG-Asc plus bisacodyl)
Other Names:
  • Coolprep®; Taejoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea
  • Dulcorax-S®; Boehringer Ingelheim, Seoul, Korea

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The quality of the bowel preparation using preparation scale
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Preparation scale
20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The patient's tolerability
Time Frame: 30 minutes before the colonoscopy
Patients were asked with questionnaires about the symptoms
30 minutes before the colonoscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yoon Tae Jeen, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastrointestinal Medical Instrument Research, Korea University College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Seung Hun Kang, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastrointestinal Medical Instrument Research, Korea University College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Disease

Clinical Trials on Polyethylene Glycols

Subscribe