Takayasu Arteritis Clinical Trial in China (TACTIC)

April 21, 2025 updated by: Jiang lindi

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Leflunomide Versus Placebo Combined With Basic Prednisone Therapy in Patients With Active Takayasu Arteritis: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LEF) versus placebo combined with prednisone for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Chinese population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare form of large-vessel vasculitis, characterized by immune -induced vascular inflammation, resulting in the stenosis and occlusion of blood vessels [1]. TAK is observed predominantly in Asian females under 40 years of age [2, 3]. The stenosis or occlusion of blood vessels can cause severe ischemic events (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, death) involving multiple organs. Patients with TAK experience impaired quality of life [4] and face a significantly higher risk of death compared with that in the sex- and age-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ranging from 2.7 to 17.3 [5, 6, 7]. Thus, timely and efficacious treatment is important to improve the prognosis in such a young population.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line therapy for active TAK [8, 9]. High-dose GCs are initially efficacious. However, disease recurrence can occur in approximately 60% patients during the GCs tapering [10, 11]. Prolonged use of GCs is associated with significant toxicity, including glucose-metabolism disorders, cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), and osteoporosis [12, 13]. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy is required to minimize the dose and duration of GC exposure [8, 9]. Conventional immunosuppressants have been recommended as GC-tapering agents for active TAK, whereas biological agents are recommended in refractory cases [8, 9]. Most previous studies focused on TAK treatment have been observational, only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are found, among which, just one study reported the effect of conventional immunosuppressants mycophenolate [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Thus, high-quality evidence to support therapeutic options of conventional immunosuppressants is very limited.

Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional immunosuppressant [19], which has shown satisfied GC-tapering effects in the treatment of giant cell arteritis, another large vessel vasculitis, in several observational studies [20, 21, 22]. In 2012, the first open-label study of 14 TAK patients demonstrated that 70% of patients could achieve at least partial clinical remission, and the GC dose could be reduced by 50% during LEF treatment [23]. Since then, several observational cohort or case-control studies have reported the efficacy of LEF for active TAK [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. A most recent study reported a comparable complete response rate of LEF (78%) versus adalimumab (88%) at 15-month follow-up [30]. Thus, LEF would be a promising alternative treatment for TAK, but evidence from RCTs is lacking.

We conducted this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LEF versus placebo combined with prednisone for active TAK, namely "Takayasu arteritis clinical trial in China" (TACTIC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981979).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Beijing Anzhen Hospital
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China
        • The First Hospital of China Medical University
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    • Xinjiang
      • Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
        • People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria i. Male or females aged 18-65 years diagnosed with TAK according to the classification criteria set by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990; ii. With active disease within the last 3 months, meeting at least two of the following conditions:

  1. new vascular ischemic manifestations/physical signs or systemic symptoms;
  2. evaluated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥6 mg/L or C reactive protein (CRP) ≥10 mg/L without other confounding factors (e.g., infection);
  3. active vascular inflammation as indicated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), color Doppler ultrasonography or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT); iii. Individuals should not receive LEF within 3 months before screening; iv. For individuals who received cyclophosphamide before screening, cyclophosphamide should be discontinued for ≥8 weeks; for patients who received a biological agent before screening, biological agents (e.g., tocilizumab, rituximab, and inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor) should be discontinued for ≥12 weeks; v. For patients who were taking prednisone (or its equivalent) before screening, the dose should be ≤0.6 mg/kg/day and the dose should be stable for ≥4 weeks; vi. Pregnancy should not be planned and a pregnancy test should be negative.

Exclusion criteria i. Individuals who had only vascular dilatation or aneurysm formation; ii. Individuals who had received revascularization surgery within the previous 3 months; iii. Individuals with severe organ dysfunction meeting at least one of the following:

  1. heart dysfunction: New York Heart Association grade IV;
  2. renal dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min;
  3. liver dysfunction: Child-Pugh grade ≥2;
  4. neurologic severe ischemic event: amaurosis on 3 consecutive days, acute cerebral infarction, or cerebral hemorrhage;
  5. uncontrolled blood pressure >160/100 mmHg; iv. Individuals had at least one following abnormal laboratory test results:

(1) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate transaminase ≥1.5-fold of the upper limit of normal in serum; (2) white blood cell count ≤4×109/L; (3) platelet count ≤100×109/L; (4) hemoglobin ≤85 g/L; v. Individuals had other types of autoimmune disease or uncontrolled asthma who need prednisone ≥10 mg/day, a history of malignant tumor or any serious acute/chronic infection, including positivity for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or clinical/radiological/laboratory evidence of active tuberculosis; vi. Individuals who were allergic to any of the investigational drugs; vii. Individuals had at least one of the following unacceptable treatments or medications:

  1. previous treatment with LEF for ≥3 months but not efficacious;
  2. planning to receive an attenuated vaccine during the study period;
  3. planning to undergo (or have undergone) organ transplantation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Leflunomide group

For the first 24 weeks, patients in the LEF group were treated with prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF (20mg/d, p.o.). The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52.

By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the LEF group discontinued the study.

Leflunomide:

For LEF arm, 20mg per day, p.o. through the whole study. For placebo group, 20mg per day, p.o. from week 25 to week 52.

Prednisone (5mg/tab): basic therapy, start with 0.6mg/kg/d and maintained for 4 weeks, then reducing 5mg every 2 weeks until 10mg per day.
Placebo Comparator: Control Group

For the first 24 weeks, patients in the placebo group received prednisone (0.6mg/kg/d, p.o.) and LEF simulator (2 tablets/d, p.o.). Patients were instructed to take tablets regularly. The initial dose of prednisone was maintained for 4 weeks and then tapered by 5.0 mg every 2 weeks. The tapering of prednisone dose was determined by the investigators based on their assessment of disease activity. Two investigators formulated a tapering plan for the same time. If there were differences between the 2 investigators' perspectives, a third experienced senior rheumatologist (Lindi Jiang) made the final decision. Once the prednisone dose was reduced to 10 mg/d, this dose was maintained to the end of week 52.

By week 24, if clinical remission had been achieved, the patients proceeded to maintenance therapy with LEF (20 mg/day) from week 25. If the patient did not meet the criteria for clinical remission, unblinding was carried out: patients in the placebo group switched to LEF (20 mg/day) .

Leflunomide:

For LEF arm, 20mg per day, p.o. through the whole study. For placebo group, 20mg per day, p.o. from week 25 to week 52.

Prednisone (5mg/tab): basic therapy, start with 0.6mg/kg/d and maintained for 4 weeks, then reducing 5mg every 2 weeks until 10mg per day.
2 tabs/d used in placebo arm for the first 24 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of clinical remission at week 24
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks

Clinical remission is defined as follows:

(i) have no systemic symptoms (e.g., fever, fatigue, weight loss); (ii) have no new onset of ischemic symptoms and signs; (iii) have a normal level of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). If not achieved, the investigator excluded other influencing factors (especially infection), re-measure the ESR after 1 week, and use the re-examined value in the analyses.

Subject achieving clinical remission should meet all these criteria above.

The clinical remission rate and its difference between LEF and placebo group with 95% confidence interval (CI) at week 24 was estimated by Newcombe-Wilson procedure. If the lower limit of the 95%CI of the difference >10%, it is considered that the efficacy of LEF is significantly superior to placebo.

From the date of randomization until the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to clinical remission
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented clinical remission, assessed up to 24 weeks
From the date of randomization until the date of first documented clinical remission, assessed up to 24 weeks
The mean prednisone dose at week 24
Time Frame: At the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
At the end of induced remission therapy, assessed up to 24 weeks
Achievement of clinical remission at week 52 in those who switched from placebo to LEF from week 25
Time Frame: From the time of switch from placebo to LEF treatment (week 25), assessed up to week 52
From the time of switch from placebo to LEF treatment (week 25), assessed up to week 52
Disease recurrence through week 25 to week 52
Time Frame: From the beginning of week 25 to the end of follow up, assessed up to week 52

Disease recurrence is defined as NIH score ≥2 or not meeting ≥2 criteria for clinical remission.

NIH score:

1) presence of systemic symptoms as fever, fatigue and weight loss (1');

2)presence of ischemic symptoms or signs (1');

3) abnormal serum ESR levels (1');

4) progression or new site of vascular lesions on MRA or CTA compared to baseline(1').

From the beginning of week 25 to the end of follow up, assessed up to week 52
Time to recurrence
Time Frame: from the beginning of achieving clinical remission to the date of the first documented disease recurrence, assessed up to 52 weeks
from the beginning of achieving clinical remission to the date of the first documented disease recurrence, assessed up to 52 weeks
Imaging changes at the end of week 24 and week 52 compared to the baseline
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of week 24 and week 52
From the date of randomization until the end of week 24 and week 52
Safety-adverse events
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the end of this trial, assessed up to 52 weeks
For safety analysis, the incidence and severity of AEs, adverse drug reactions and laboratory values in the LEF and placebo group would be estimated and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The association of an abnormal laboratory index and adverse event with the investigational drug would be evaluated.
From the date of randomization until the end of this trial, assessed up to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lindi Jiang, Doctor, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Takayasu Arteritis

Clinical Trials on Leflunomide(LEF)

Subscribe