Evaluation of Non-Invasive Respiratory Volume Monitor

January 8, 2019 updated by: Tufts Medical Center

Blinded Observational Study to Evaluate a Non-Invasive Respiratory Volume Monitor in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and on the General Hospital Floor

This observational study investigates the validity and utility of a new, non-significant risk, FDA approved respiratory monitor, ExSpiron, in the perioperative course of patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The study patients will be monitored before, during and after surgery, in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and recovery room for the first post-operative night. The physiologic data will not be used or influence the standard of care for subjects. It is anticipated that this monitor may be able to improve perioperative care in the future.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim and Hypotheses Currently, there is no objective measure of early respiratory indicators for developing respiratory compromise in surgical patients. Current respiratory assessment in non-intubated patients relies on oximetry data and subjective clinical assessment. Pulse oximetry has been extremely helpful in recognizing oxygen desaturations but it is a late indicator of respiratory decline. New advances in technology and digital signal processing have led to the development of an impedance based Respiratory Volume Monitor (RVM). The RVM (ExSpiron™, Respiratory Motion, Inc.; Waltham, MA) has been shown to provide accurate real-time, continuous, non-invasive measurements of tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (MV) and respiratory rate (RR) in general patient population.

Hypotheses

Primary:

Low minute ventilation (LMV) defined as sustained LMV<40% minute ventilation predicted (MVPRED) based on IBW following opioid administration correlates with adverse clinical outcomes in PACU or on the floor including:

  • O2 desaturation, atelectasis, respiratory status requiring advanced monitoring
  • respiratory interventions such as O2 administration, continuous positive airway pressure CPAP, BiPAP,
  • incidence of ICU transfer and/or increase in PACU and/or general hospital floor (GHF) length of stay (LOS).

Secondary:

  • 1. Decreased MV defined as sustained MV<80% MVPRED based on IBW before opioid administration correlates with adverse clinical outcomes as defined above.
  • 2. Patients with decreased MV prior to opioid administration will be more likely to develop LMV after standard opioid administration compared to patients with normal MV defined as MV ≥ 81% MVPRED based on ideal body weight (IBW)

Rationale Continuous respiratory monitoring using the ExSpiron System will be particularly beneficial to patients in the post-anesthesia environment. Assessment and management of respiratory function and early intervention when indicated is a multifaceted, complex task often complicated by the lack of a cohesive and continuous monitoring system to guide clinical decisions. The ExSpiron system is designed for these patients and is intended to address some of the limitations of the current generation of hospital monitors and to provide healthcare providers with continuous real-time data regarding the patient's respiratory status. Recent data has shown that stratification of patients based on the RVM's MV as % of predicted MV (MVPRED), prior to opioid dosing has made it possible to identify patients who are at risk for further decreases in MV and opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD).

  1. In the spontaneously breathing, non-ventilated patient, current monitoring devices do not provide continuous, objective non-invasive, continuous real time information of the important respiratory parameters TV, MV & RR.
  2. Current monitoring of non-intubated patients mostly relies on subjective clinical assessment, oximetry data, and rarely end-tidal carbon dioxide CO2 measurements. In appropriate clinical settings, the ExSpiron system can provide direct quantitative measure of ventilation parameters for use in clinical assessment and trend prediction as well as response to medications and other interventions to allow for more efficient clinical decision making.
  3. Current technologies do not provide for a continuity of care between the PACU and the general hospital floor.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation, patient's ≥80 pounds and who are able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give informed consent. Any patient whose condition or procedure will not allow for placement of the electrode PadSet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Low minute ventilation
Time Frame: Post-operatively in PACU and general patient' floor up to 24 hours after completion of surgery
Low minute ventilation (LMV) defined as sustained LMV<40% minute ventilation predicted (MVPRED) based on IBW following opioid administration correlates with adverse clinical outcomes in PACU and on the floor
Post-operatively in PACU and general patient' floor up to 24 hours after completion of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Iwona Bonney, PhD, Tufts Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11544

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Monitoring for Low Minute Ventilation Post Surgery

Clinical Trials on Non-Invasive Respiratory Volume Monitor

3
Subscribe