Improve Glaucoma Medication Adherence (MAGIC)

March 25, 2021 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Improving Glaucoma Medication Adherence

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial enrolling Veterans with medically treated glaucoma who report less than 100% adherence to the prescribed glaucoma therapy. Participants will be randomized to receive either a one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing the disease process and strategies for administering eye drops (intervention) or a one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing general eye health (control). All participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder function will be activated. The proportion or prescribed doses taken according to the monitor will be compared for the two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose if this study is to improve glaucoma medication adherence in Veterans with medically-treated glaucoma. The study design is a single-site randomized controlled trial. Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of an intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence among Veterans at 6-month follow up.

Hypothesis 1: Veterans randomized to the intervention will have a greater proportion of prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control arm.

The primary outcome for hypothesis 1A is the proportion of prescribed doses taken according to the electronic monitor. Participants in both arms will receive the electronic monitor or "smart bottle," which wirelessly transmits the date and time of opening of the smart bottle to the study team. From these medication events, the proportion of prescribed doses will be derived, defined as the ratio of the number of times the smart bottle was opened to the required number of doses prescribed according to the medical record over the period of time that the bottle is in use. For example, if a participant is advised to take his or her glaucoma drop twice a day for the 180 days that the bottle is in use and the smart bottle reveals 135 openings over the same time period, the proportion of prescribed doses taken is 37.5%.

Specific Aim 2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention on intensification of glaucoma therapy among Veterans at 12-month follow-up.

Hypothesis 2: The proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy, defined as addition of adjuvant glaucoma medication or recommendation for laser or glaucoma surgery will be less than the proportion of Veterans in the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following the intervention.

Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months following the baseline visit . The investigators will collect these data at 12 months because the Metrics study suggested that 55% of participants in the control arm will have intensification of therapy within one year.

Specific Aim 3. Evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness and budget and workflow impacts of the intervention compared to usual care.

Hypothesis 3: The intervention will be cost-effectiveness for the following ratios: 1) cost per percentage improvement in medication adherence; 2) cost per blindness averted; and 3) cost per quality-adjusted-life years saved.

A direct measurement approach will be used to estimate per-patient intervention and control arm costs. Glaucoma-related health care utilization costs will be derived from VA administrative datasets. The cost estimates will be combined with observed improvement in medication adherence and reduction in escalation in therapy to estimate the first two incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Simulation using Markov modeling will be used to estimate the incremental cost per blindness averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall budget and workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma [primary open angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, combined mechanism glaucoma, low tension glaucoma] recorded in the medical record
  • Prescribed glaucoma eye drops,
  • Visual field performed within the last 9 months.

    • As visual field testing is standard care glaucoma and the investigators wish to establish baseline glaucoma severity, the investigators will require that subjects have a visual field test documented in the chart within 9 months of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for patients At Screener:

  • "How confident are you that you always remember to use your glaucoma medications?"

    • not at all confident
    • somewhat confident
    • very confident)
  • And "In the past 4 weeks, did you ever forget to take your medicine?"

    • Veterans who respond both "very confident" and "no", respectively, will be excluded

Inclusion criteria for companions at screener:

  • Willing to participate in assisting the patient with glaucoma drops and
  • Willing to accompany the patient to the intervention visit for participants in the intervention arm or eye health education visit for participants in the control arm.

Exclusion criteria for companions: Unable or unwilling to attend baseline visit and intervention or control arm educational session with patient participant.

Exclusion criteria for patients or companions:

  • Lacks proficiency in English,
  • Lacks either a cell phone or landline phone.

Exclusion criteria for patients post randomization:

  • Decision by patient and provider to cease glaucoma medication use
  • Change in functional status such that the drops are no longer administered by the patient or the companion (such as nursing home care)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participants will be randomized to receive either a general eye health educational session (control arm) or an educational intervention developed to improve glaucoma medication adherence (intervention arm). All participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened.
Discussion of glaucoma and the potential for blindness, facilitated by the glaucoma educator using a 3-dimensional model eye and photographic representation of glaucomatous vision loss; One-one-one demonstration of eye drop instillation techniques, Provision of a mnemonic aid which alerts the participant to missed doses; Review of the participant manual: An illustrated brochure on glaucoma and eye drop instillation. An individualized schedule for dosing of glaucoma medications. Individualized suggestions for improving adherence based on the subject's responses to the (SASES).
Participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder through AdhereTech will be activated.
Other Names:
  • Smart bottle reminder
Active Comparator: Control
Participants will be randomized to receive either a general eye health educational session (control arm) or an educational intervention developed to improve glaucoma medication adherence (intervention arm). All participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened.
The control information session will include review of a Powerpoint presentation on general eye health, including but not specific to glaucoma.
Participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house one of their glaucoma medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened.
Other Names:
  • Smart bottle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Prescribed Glaucoma Medication Doses Taken on Schedule
Time Frame: Randomization to 6 Months
Will veterans randomized to the intervention have a greater proportion of prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control arm? The electronic bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder through the electronic bottle will be activated. The outcome measure is the proportion of prescribed doses taken with a minimum of Zero and a maximum of One; where higher scores indicate more adherence.
Randomization to 6 Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Newly Prescribed Glaucoma Therapy
Time Frame: 12 Months
Will the proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy be less than the proportion of Veterans in the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following the intervention? Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months following the baseline visit .
12 Months
Cost-effectiveness Compared to Usual Care for Cost Per Percentage Improvement in Medication Adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Will the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care for cost per percentage improvement in medication adherence
12 months
VA Budget Impacts
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will investigate the overall budget impacts to the VA healthcare system.
12 months
VA Healthcare Workflow Effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.
12 months
Cost-effectiveness Compared to Usual Care for Cost Per Blindness Averted
Time Frame: 12 months
Will the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care for cost per blindness averted
12 months
Cost-effectiveness Compared to Usual Care for Cost Per Quality-adjusted-life Years Saved.
Time Frame: 12 months
Will the intervention be cost-effectiveness compared to usual care for cost per quality-adjusted-life years saved?
12 months
VA Workflow Effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will investigate the overall workload impacts to the VA healthcare system.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelly W. Muir, MD MHSc, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 15-113

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is not a plan to make IPD available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Educational - glaucoma

3
Subscribe