Preferences for Open Vs. Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA)

September 20, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Alignment of Treatment Preferences and Repair Type for Veterans With AAA

This study tests the use of a decision aid for Veterans who are facing a decision about surgery for their Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA). The local site investigators (LSI) will enroll Veterans with AAA who are candidates for endovascular or open surgical repair. There are 22-24 VA Medical Centers participating in the trial. 12 sites will be randomly assigned to the intervention group, and 12 sites will be randomly assigned to the control group. Twelve Veterans will be enrolled at each site. At sites assigned to the intervention arm, Veterans will receive a decision aid with information about the two types of surgery for AAA repair, open and endovascular, and complete a survey about their preferences. Veterans at control sites will complete the same survey, but will not receive the decision aid. After their surgery, Veterans will take another survey asking about their satisfaction. The LSI will compare the results of the survey between Veterans' in the intervention and control groups to determine the effect of the decision aid on agreement between preference and repair type.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a cluster randomized trial comparing two ways to better align Veterans' preferences and treatments for AAA: (1) a validated decision aid describing AAA repair types with a survey measuring Veterans' preference for repair type -- versus (2) the survey alone. Enrolled Veterans will be candidates for either endovascular or open repair, and be followed at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform both types of repair. In Aim 1, the investigators will determine Veterans' preferences for endovascular or open repair and identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, the investigators will compare agreement between Veterans' preferences and repair type between the decision aid+survey and survey-alone groups. In Aim 3, the investigators will investigate the facilitators and barriers of implementing a decision aid in a VA surgical clinic. The investigators will identify factors associated with agreement. The investigators' findings will be reported to the National Surgery Office Vascular Surgery Advisory Board to help ensure Veterans' preferences remain at the center of AAA treatment decisions. The investigators have recruited 20 VA Medical Centers and their vascular surgery teams to participate in this trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
        • Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
        • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
        • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95655
        • VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, United States, 02301
        • VA Boston Healthcare System Brockton Campus, Brockton, MA
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
        • Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68105-1873
        • Omaha VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
        • VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, NY
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
    • Oklahoma
      • Muskogee, Oklahoma, United States, 74401
        • Jackson C. Montgomery VA Medical Center, Muskogee, OK
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
        • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
    • Vermont
      • White River Junction, Vermont, United States, 05009-0001
        • White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran with a > or = 5.0 cm AAA who are candidates for both open and endovascular surgical repair, with no previous AAA repair surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans who are not candidates for both open and endovascular repair, and are less than < 5.0 cm AAA in size

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: decision aid
the experimental group will receive the decision aid
Decision aid for repair type for aortic abdominal aneurysms
No Intervention: control
the control group will only receive the survey

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Veteran Preference for Repair Type
Time Frame: 30 days
The investigators' survey will measure the effect of the decision aid on Veterans preference for repair type for abdominal aortic aneurysms and domains associated with preference for each repair type (endovascular or open)
30 days
Agreement Between Veterans Preferences for Repair Type and Actual Repair Type
Time Frame: 30 days
The investigators' survey instruments will assess the effect of the decision aid on the agreement between Veteran's preference for repair type and actual repair type they receive
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision Regret Scale
Time Frame: 30 days
The investigators will use the patient satisfaction questionnaire short form 18 to assess patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction will be reported based on the average Decision Process Score for both decision and control groups, with a score of 5 representing the highest level of satisfaction and a score of 0 representing the lowest level of satisfaction.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip Goodney, MD, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 15-085

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Decision aid

Subscribe