Pain Management for Patients With Low Back Pain and Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Hospital Setting.

October 28, 2020 updated by: Central Jutland Regional Hospital

Does a Patient Education Focused on Pain Management Improve Disability, Pain Coping and Quality of Life in Patients With Low Back Pain and Psychosocial Risk Factors?

Patients with low back pain and coexisting psychosocial risk factors have a poorer prognosis in terms of quality of life, disability, sick leave and health care use. Despite existing literature showing that low back pain patients benefit from cognitive therapy interventions, this has not been investigated in subgroups of low back pain patients with psychosocial risk factors.

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether patients referred to secondary care with low back pain and coexisting psychosocial risk factors will have a better treatment outcome when participating in a pain management course in addition to usual care.

This will be investigated in a randomised study design, where 130 patients with chronic low back pain and psychosocial risk factors will be randomly allocated to either usual care or a cognitive-therapy based pain management intervention in addition to usual care.

The patients will be followed for one year after inclusion, and patientreported outcomes on disability, pain, sick leave, quality of life and pain coping will be collected by the use of questionnaires at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
        • Diagnostic Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-specifick low back pain lasting ≥ 3 months
  • Psychosocial risk profile defined as a fear avoidance score >24 (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire) and/or a bodily distress score >15 (Common Mental Disorder Questionnaire) and/or health anxiety score >9 (Common Mental Disorder Questionnaire)
  • Speaks and understands Danish
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory or malignant disease
  • Spine surgery within the last year
  • Untreated or severe depression
  • Psychiatric course of treatment within the last year
  • Abuse of drugs or alcohol
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual care
All patients receive a thorough physical examination by a rheumatologist or a chiropractor with a subsequent examination by a physiotherapist.The patients receive general information about the nature back pain, adjustment of analgesic treatment and clarification of any need of further diagnosing or assessment by a surgeon. The physiotherapist furthermore makes an assessment of the patients' physical capacity and function and provides guidelines for any exercise programme. Based on the physiotherapist's judgement, the patient may be referred to rehabilitation in the local community
Experimental: Group based pain management intervention
In addition to usual care as described for the control group, the patients in the intervention group will participate in a cognitive group-based pain management intervention. The aim of the intervention is to improve the patients' understanding of their back pain problem, and that they learn different pain coping strategies. The intervention is based on cognitive behavioural therapy including elements of acceptance and commitment therapy, and furthermore uses different relaxation and breathing exercises.
The intervention is delivered as six separate sessions of each two hours duration over a four month period. The sessions are managed by a multidisciplinary team from the Spine Center, led by a psychologist. Before the first session, each patient in the intervention group participates in an individual consultation with the psychologist or nurse, with the aim of matching expectations for the group intervention, and hereby ensure the patients compliance throughout the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
The Roland-Morris is a 24-item self-report questionnaire about how low-back pain affects functional activities. Each question is worth one point so scores can range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability).
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Low Back Pain Rating Scale - Back pain
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
In the present study only the pain index of the LBPRS is used. The LBPRS pain index consists of two subscales, which measure back pain and leg pain, respectively. On each subscale the intensity of back pain and leg pain are reported on a 0-10 scale (best-worst) using the following three questions: the pain intensity at the time of examination, the average pain intensity within the past two weeks and the worst pain experienced within the past two weeks. The score of each subscale are reported separately (0-10 scale).
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Low Back Pain Rating Scale - Leg pain
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
In the present study only the pain index of the LBPRS is used. The LBPRS pain index consists of two subscales, which measure back pain and leg pain, respectively. On each subscale the intensity of back pain and leg pain are reported on a 0-10 scale (best-worst) using the following three questions: the pain intensity at the time of examination, the average pain intensity within the past two weeks and the worst pain experienced within the past two weeks. The score of each subscale are reported separately (0-10 scale).
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
EuroQol 5 Dimensions
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
The EQ-5D is a measure of generic quality of life. It comprises five dimensions, which are mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three levels (no problem, some problems, extreme problems) resulting in a total of 245 potential health states. The scores fall on a scale of -0.624 to 1.000 (perfect health) including the scores of -0.293 for "unconscious" and 0.000 for "dead".
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
The PCS measures an individual's pain experience through 13 questions asking about how one feels and what he/she thinks about when in pain. The PCS evaluates pain catastrophizing as a single construct with three components: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Each question is answered on a 0-4 scale (best worst), adding up to a total score of 0-52 (best-worst).
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
Sick leave
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline
The patients report their average weekly sick leave during the past 4 weeks in the three categories 0 days per week, 1-4 days per week, 5-7 days per week, all the time.
Change from baseline to 12 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nanna Rolving, PhD, Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available to other researchers when the study results have been published (anticipated 2020). The data will be available on request from the authors.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Group based pain management intervention

3
Subscribe