Effects of Supplemental Oxygen Delivered by a Portable Oxygen Concentrator Compared to a Liquid Oxygen Device in COPD

February 14, 2018 updated by: Klaus Kenn, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

Effects of Supplemental Oxygen Delivered by a Portable Oxygen Concentrator Compared to a Liquid Oxygen Device in Hypoxemic COPD Patients at Rest

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of supplemental oxygen on blood oxygenation at rest in Patients with severe to very severe COPD comparing the portable oxygen concentrator (Activox™ 4L) to a liquid continuous oxygen device (Companion®).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It has been proven that supplemental oxygen increases oxygen saturation and reduces dyspnea in hypoxemic COPD Patients. There are different oxygen delivery systems available, some of them operating with liquid oxygen and others by concentrating the ambient air (concentrators). An advantage of the concentrator system is, that there is no refill required, but only a power plug and plug socket, enabling the patient for higher mobility and to be more autonomous. There are only few publications about whether portable oxygen concentrators have a comparable efficiency on oxygen saturation to liquid oxygen devices with continuous flow (LOD) or not. Until now there are no official recommendations about how to convert the oxygen flow rate for LOD (liter per minute) into the corresponding level of the POC.

Therefore, we investigate the comparability of the portable oxygen concentrator Activox™ 4L (POC) to a liquid oxygen device (Companion®) in 30 hypoxemic COPD patients at rest.

As a baseline assessment, the patients will receive a bodyplethysmography, blood gas analysis without using supplemental oxygen and an evaluation of the diffusion capacity of the lung for CO.

The study will be conducted on 2 consecutive days. 15 patients will be randomized into two different groups: First group will start with POC and will continue the following day with LOD; The second group will start with LOD and continue with POC (cross-over design). All patients will use the same oxygen devices during the study assessments (LOD: Companion 1000 (CE 0050), Chart Industries Inc., Garfiel Heights, OH, USA; POC: Activox™ 4L, Inovalabs Inc., Texas, USA). On both days of the study, patients will be connected to one of the two systems via nasal cannula for a total time period of 40 minutes, while the patient remains in a sitting position without talking. The oxygen flow rate starts at 1liter/min (LOD) or Level 1 (POC) and will be increased every 10 minutes to the next higher level until the maximum of 4l/min (LOD) or level 4 (POC) is reached. Blood gases were taken and breathing frequency will be recorded at the end of each Oxygen Level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Schoenau Am Koenigssee, Germany
        • Schoen Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COPD patients with hypoxemia at rest (paO2 < 55 or 60 mmHg, according to the recent supplemental oxygen guidelines [Hadringe, M., et al., British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults. Thorax, 2015. 70 Suppl 1: p. i1-43.]
  • Participation in an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (Schön Klinik BGL)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Need of more than 4 Liter/min Oxygen at rest to achieve PaO2 > 55 or 60mmHg
  • Signs of acute exacerbation
  • General exclusion criteria for exercise tests, e.g. acute coronary syndrome, acute myo- or pericarditis, acute lung embolism, pulmonary infarction, acute uncontrolled heart insufficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: COPD patients with delivery order 1, 2
Patients will use two different Oxygen devices at rest (1.liquid oxygen device (Companion R), 2. portable Oxygen concentrator (Activox TM 4L))
This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order
Other Names:
  • Companion 1000 Chart Industries, Inc. Garfield Heights, USA
This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order
Other Names:
  • Activox™ 4L, Inovalabs Inc., Texas, USA
Experimental: COPD patients with delivery order 2,1
Patients will use two different Oxygen devices at rest (1. portable Oxygen concentrator (Activox TM 4L), 2. liquid oxygen device (Companion R))
This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order
Other Names:
  • Companion 1000 Chart Industries, Inc. Garfield Heights, USA
This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order
Other Names:
  • Activox™ 4L, Inovalabs Inc., Texas, USA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between LOD and POC in Partial pressure of oxygen levels
Time Frame: after 10 minutes of each LOD step compared to 10 minutes of each POC step
PO2 values between LOD and POC at comparable Levels of oxygen supply (1liter/minute LOD will be compared to Level 1 of POC until 4liters/Minute LOD to Level 4 of POC)
after 10 minutes of each LOD step compared to 10 minutes of each POC step

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between LOD and POC in Partial pressure of carbon dioxide levels
Time Frame: after 10 minutes of each LOD step compared to 10 minutes of each POC step
PCO2 values between LOD and POC at comparable Levels of oxygen supply (1liter/minute LOD will be compared to Level 1 of POC until 4liters/Minute LOD to Level 4 of POC)
after 10 minutes of each LOD step compared to 10 minutes of each POC step
Change of partial pressure of Oxygen from one POC step to the next step
Time Frame: after 10 minutes of one POC step compared to after 10 minutes of the next POC step
Change in PO2 values from e.g. POC step 1 to POC step 2, step 2 to 3 etc.
after 10 minutes of one POC step compared to after 10 minutes of the next POC step
Change of partial pressure of carbon dioxide from one POC step to the next step
Time Frame: after 10 minutes of one POC step compared to after 10 minutes of the next POC step
Change in PCO2 values between e.g. POC step 1 to POC step 2, step 2 to 3 etc.
after 10 minutes of one POC step compared to after 10 minutes of the next POC step

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on liquid oxygen device (LOD)

3
Subscribe