Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Non-contact Optical Device for Skin Oxygenation Imaging (IMOXY)

December 24, 2021 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Study of the Concordance Between Skin Oxygen Saturation Measurements Made by an Innovative Non-contact Optical Imaging Device (IPAM) and the Reference Medical Device (Periflux 6000) in Patients With Skin Vascular Disorders or Chronic Wounds

According to international consensus, information on the level of skin oxygenation is necessary for the diagnostic management of chronic wounds. The measurement of transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure (or TcPO2, according to the acronym) is measurable with a medical device that uses a Clark electrode. Since the medical device in question is expensive and the measurement time-consuming (approximately 45 minutes per patient), the TcPO2 is only rarely accessible (in hospital medicine as in nursing homes) and is therefore not predominant in the clinical decision. The clinical decision is currently mainly based on the result of the ankle blood pressure measurement, which is readily available.

The main objective is to study, from the same skin surfaces (same localization of skin sites and same dimensions of each surface in cm²), in patients with cutaneous vascular disorders or chronic wounds, the relationship between (i) the transcutaneous oxygen saturation values (expressed as a percentage) by the innovative non-contact optical imaging device under study (IPAM, method to be validated) and (ii) the transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure values (TcPO2) (expressed in millimeters of mercury, mmHg) measured by the reference medical device (Périflux6000, gold standard).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The InnovaTICs Dépendance project, funded by the Grand Region Is, aims to develop a medical device meeting the need to measure quickly and non-invasively the skin oxygen saturation. To do this, a device medical was developed by CRAN (Joint Research Unit of the University of Lorraine and CNRS); its industrial transfer was entrusted to the company SD Innovation to produce the VRPC device for "video-reconstruction of chronic wounds". The VRPC medical device makes it possible to measure skin oxygen saturation by an optical (atraumatic) and non-contact (non-invasive) method, more quickly than the current method proposes. The capacity of the VRPC device to measure in vivo variations in skin oxygen saturation was confirmed by carrying out measurements on healthy volunteers. The measured values made it possible to show that the VRPC device was able to detect the difference in skin oxygen saturation between the skin covering a "healthy" finger and the skin covering the same finger but after a tourniquet had been placed at the base of the first phalanx of the finger (data not published).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54500
        • CHRU de Nancy
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Julien AZZI, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Athanasios BENETOS, MD-PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nicla SETTEMBRE, MD-PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Serguei MALIKOV, MD-PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major,
  • Having signed the informed consent to participate in the clinical study
  • Compulsory affiliation to a social security scheme
  • Presenting at least one of the following two criteria:

    • Presence of a PAD at the stage of Chronic Critical Ischemia (CHF) of stage III or IV according to the classification of Leriche and Fontaine,
    • Presence of one (or more) chronic wound (s) of the lower limbs of the pressure sore or ulcer type.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person referred to in Articles L. 1121-5, L1121-6, L. 1121-7 and L1121-8 of the Public Health Code.
  • Pregnant woman, parturient or nursing mother
  • Minor (non-emancipated)
  • Adult person subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
  • Person of full age unable to express consent
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons undergoing psychiatric treatment under Articles L.3212-1 and L. 3213-1.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oxygen cutaneous saturation rate (ScO2) then transcutaneous oxygen partial pressure (TcPO2)
ScO2 values will be measured using IPAM first then TcPO2 values will be measured using Periflux6000. ALways in the same order.
Skin oxygen saturation rate will be measured (%) using the non-contact optical device under evaluation called IPAM
Skin TcPO2 will be measured (mmHg) using the reference device called PeriFlux6000

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linear regression between the skin oxygen saturation rate (ScO2) values and the Transcutaneous oxygen partial (TcPO2) pressure values
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The relationship between TcPO2 and ScO2 measurements will be modeled
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of clinical decision influenced by the IPAM device
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Questionnaire about the impact of the IPAM measurement on the clinical decision
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Variation coefficient of the IPAM measurement made 3 times in a row on 3 different skin sites
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Repeatability of the IPAM measurement made 3 times in a row on 3 different skin sites
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Duration of use in seconds
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the mean duration time for acquiring one measurement with each of the devices used in the study
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Skin surface accessible for measurement in square centimeters
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the mean skin surface on which skin oxygen saturation rate and TcPO2 may be measured by each of the two medical devices used fot his study
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Ergonomics evaluation in terms of physical and mind efforts
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Using a scale already used for medical devices ergonomics evaluation, the ergonomics of the two devices will be compared
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Mosaicing software success rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The mosaicing software will be evaluated on a 20s-duration video sequence
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Risk evaluation: redness will be evaluated on a scale from zero to ten
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Skin reddening will be evaluated
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-A03140-39

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obliterating Arteriopathy of the Lower Limbs

Clinical Trials on Oxygen saturation measurement using the IPAM device

3
Subscribe