Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Knee Osteoarthritis

January 20, 2020 updated by: Servicio Canario de Salud

Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Candidates for Primary Total Arthroplasty

The main goal of this study is assess the effectiveness of a DA for patients with knee osteoarthritis candidates to ART

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The number of knee total arthroplasty (ART) interventions has increased in the last 10 years in European countries, partly due to the aging of the population and partly because of the increase in the use of these interventions to improve the quality of life among elderly patients. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2012, from 2000 to 2010 in Spain the percentage of knee ART has doubled in recent years. .

The role of citizens in decisions affecting their health is changing. Individual factors such as improving educational attainment and access to medical information, and collective factors such as training of patient groups and changes in legislation (informed consent, autonomy principle) have motivated the transition from a paternalistic model to a co-responsibility model. Shared decision-making (TDC) has been proposed in recent years as a model of care that promotes users' involvement in the decisions about their treatment, in those situations where there is uncertainty and / or the scientific evidence reports a balance between benefits and risks that is similar for two or more therapeutic options. Decision aids (DA) are tools designed to promote and facilitate patients' involvement in medical decisions concerning their health

Objectives:

To assess the effectiveness of a DA for patients with knee osteoarthritis candidates to ART

Methodology:

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the DA versus usual care in reducing decisional conflict, increasing knowledge of the disease/treatments, informed choice and the satisfaction with the decision making process, and decreasing decisional regret.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 38004
        • Servicio de Evaluación de. Servicio Canario de Salud -

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
  • Candidates for arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have already undergone knee arthroplasty
  • Patients younger than 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
In the control group, the usual explanation about the disease and the possibilities of treatment will be followed
Experimental: Intervention group
In the Intervention group, the Decision Aid (DA) will be presented and explained to the patient by research personnel at a schedule previously agreed with the patient. The patient will be given a paper copy of the (DA) to take home, as well as a web link to the computer application, and oral and written instructions to review the material again and perform value clarification exercises.
Decision aids are tools that enables to promote and facilitate patients' involvement in medical decisions concerning their health

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional conflict, measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)
The DCS measures patients' uncertainty about treatment choice. It is composed of five subscales: uninformed, values, support, uncertainty and effectiveness
Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge of the disease and treatments
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)
A 7-item scale will be udes to assess patients' knowledge of the disease and treatments
Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)
Goals and concerns
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)
A 10-item scale will assess the importance that patients attribute to different characteristics of avaliable treatments
Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)
Treatment preference
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention; 6 months (only non-operated patients)
Patients will be asked the treatment they prefer: AINEs, knee injections or arthroplasty
Immediately after the intervention; 6 months (only non-operated patients)
Satisfaction with the decision making process
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention; 6 months
The scale developed by Barry et al. (1997) will be used, composed of 12 items measuring patients' satisfaction with information and care provided
Immediately after the intervention; 6 months
Decisional regret, measured by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: 6 months (only operated patients)
The DRS contains five items measuring patients regret with the treatment decision
6 months (only operated patients)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Amado Rivero Santana, PhD, Researcher

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Decision aid

3
Subscribe