Tregocel® as a Dietary Supplement in Mild Knee Osteoarthritis

September 17, 2022 updated by: Max Biocare Pty. Ltd.

Assessment of Performance of Participants With Mild Knee Osteoarthritis Taking Tregocel® as a Dietary Supplement Alongside Standard of Care Treatment

This study is an assessment of the overall performance of participants with symptomatic mild knee OA taking Tregocel® as a dietary supplement in addition to standard of care treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Tregocel® is a combination herbal product which as a dietary supplementation may help maintain proper performance of joints. Although some studies have reported beneficial effects for individual components of Tregocel®, there have been no clinical assessments of supplementation with Tregocel® as a finished product. This study will involve collection of data on Tregocel® supplementation in participants with symptomatic mild knee osteoarthritis (OA) who are already receiving standard pharmacological treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Clinmed Pharma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Compliance with all study procedures
  • Fulfilment of consent process
  • Documented diagnosis of radiologically confirmed mild knee osteoarthritis with stable pain management (including patello-femoral joint, Kellgren-Lawrence classification ≤2 and clinical symptoms lasting more than 6 months prior to screening)
  • Maximal pain score ≥30 on a 100 mm VAS at screening and confirmed at baseline, with PRN use of analgesics during run-in
  • Completed patient diary during run-in
  • Ambulant with ECOG score <2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or breastfeeding (women)
  • body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m^2 or more than 35.0 kg/m^2.
  • secondary knee OA
  • clinically apparent tense effusion of the target knee
  • valgus/varus knee/foot deformities, ligament laxity, or meniscal instability
  • changes in regular OA therapy during screening
  • chronic diseases which may require treatment with systemic steroids
  • progressive serious medical conditions
  • severe organ dysfunction
  • cardiac insufficiency
  • history of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding.
  • any significant medical conditions that may interfere with the study procedures, safety, compliance or overall participation in the study
  • allergies or intolerance to any of the dietary supplement ingredients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tregocel® supplementation
Tregocel® coated tablets (2/day) orally for 36 weeks
Coated tablet (oral)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in distance walked in 6-minutes as an indicator of AMBULATORY MOBILITY
Time Frame: Tested at Baseline (week 0) and at end of supplementation (week 36)
Challenge involves subject walking unimpeded along a continuous straight line of 30 metre in distance with no incline. Distance covered will by an assistant sured with a 30 metre metric tape measure. Laps and time will be tracked manually with a digital lap counter and timer (second). Baseline values will be compared to values after supplementation to determine any change in individual performance.
Tested at Baseline (week 0) and at end of supplementation (week 36)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical exam parameter 1: BODY WEIGHT measurement
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Body weight measure using digital scales (recorded in kilogram).
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Physical exam parameter 2: SUBJECT HEIGHT measurement
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Body height measured manually using a wall tape measure (recorded in metre). Weight and height values will be used to calculate body mass index [weight (kilogram) / height (metre) ^2]
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Vital sign 1: BODY TEMPERATURE
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Measured using a digital ear thermometer after 5 minutes rest, sedentary.(recorded in degree Celsius)
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Vital sign 2: BLOOD PRESSURE
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values will be determined using an automated sphygnomanometer after 5 minutes rest, sedentary (recorded in millimeter mercury).
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Vital sign 3: PULSE RATE
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Recorded using an automated sphygnomanometer after 5 minutes rest, sedentary (beats / minute)
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Arthritis self-assessment 1: Initial degree of PERCEIVED PAIN represented by manual marking on a simplified printed 100mm linear scale (during Run-in)
Time Frame: Run-in period (week -1 to week 0)
Subject responds to a request to report maximal pain experienced in 48 hours in target knee by pen or pencil marking along a 100mm line scale (0mm (left) = no pain; 100mm (right) = extreme pain; marks closer to right indicate more pain). Length from 0mm to mark will be measured using a 300mm ruler, to indicate the degree of maximal pain felt. No subscales are included in this assessment. Marks appearing between centre of the line and 100mm limit are considered moderate to severe (total score range = 0-100mm)
Run-in period (week -1 to week 0)
Arthritis self-assessment 2: change in degree of PERCEIVED PAIN represented by manual marking on a printed 100mm linear scale (During and after supplementation) in response to WOMAC questionnaire
Time Frame: Scores taken at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Subject responds to a request to report degree of pain experienced in 48 hours in target knee by pen or pencil marking along a 100mm horizontal line (0mm (left) = no pain; 100mm (right) = extreme pain; more pain = closer to right hand end of line). Length from 0mm to mark will be measured using a 300mm ruler. Report includes degree of pain felt while stationary or during normal movement (a set of 5 subscales appearing as separate lines with the same limits). Marks appearing between the centre of the line and 100mm limit are considered between moderate and severe, with more severe toward the right. Total score is a sum of the 5 subscales (range 0-500mm). WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis index.
Scores taken at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Arthritis self-assessment 3: change in degree of PERCEIVED STIFFNESS represented by manual marking on a printed 100mm linear scale (During and after supplementation) in response to WOMAC questionnaire.
Time Frame: Scores taken at baseline (0 week); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Subject responds to a request to report feeling of stiffness experienced in 48 hours in target knee by pen or pencil marking along a 100mm horizontal line (0mm (left) = no stiffness; 100mm (right) = extreme stiffness; more pain = closer to right hand end of line). Length from 0mm to mark will be measured using a 300mm ruler, to indicate the degree of stiffness felt at start and end of a day (a set of 2 subscales, appearing as separate lines with the same limits). Marks appearing from the centre of the line to 100mm limit are considered between moderate and severe, with more severe toward the right. Total score is a sum of the 2 subscales (range 0-200mm).
Scores taken at baseline (0 week); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Arthritis self-assessment 4: change in degree of PERCEIVED DIFFICULTY WITH DAILY TASKS represented by manual marking on a printed 100mm linear scale (During and after supplementation) in response to WOMAC questionnaire.
Time Frame: Scores taken at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Subject responds to a request to report difficult in performing daily tasks in 48 hours due to arthritis in target knee by pen or pencil marking along a 100mm horizontal line (0mm (left) = no pain; 100mm (right) = extreme pain; more pain = closer to right hand end of line). Length from 0mm to mark will be measured using a 300mm ruler, to indicate the degree of difficulty experienced in different domestic activities (set of 17 subscales, appearing as separate lines with the same limits). Marks appearing between the centre of the line to 100mm limit are considered between moderate and severe, with more severe toward the right. Total score is a sum of the 17 subscales (range 0-1700mm).
Scores taken at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Change in target KNEE FLEXIBILITY assessment, based on heel-thigh distance and knee angle at maximal flexion.
Time Frame: Scores taken supine and prone for both knees at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 weeks
Subjects will lie either supine or prone while holding their target knee statically as close to their thigh as is bearable. Distance from heal to thigh (standard tape measurement) and angle of knee (measured using a goniometer) will be recorded.
Scores taken supine and prone for both knees at baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (a) Blood cell count
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Number erythrocytes leukocytes and platelets initially and changes thereafter determined using an automated blood sample analyser (number x 10^9/litre)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (b) hemoglobin level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Hemoglobin will be measured initially and any subsequent changes determined using UV/Vis spectrometry (g/dL).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (c) sodium level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Blood sodium initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using a blood gas analyser (mM)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (d) potassium level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Blood sodium initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using a blood gas analyser (mM)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (e) aspartate alanine transferase level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Blood aspartate alanine transferase initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using ELISA assay (IU/L)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (f) alanine aminotransferase
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Blood alanine aminotransferase level initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using ELISA assay (IU/L)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (g) total bilirubin level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Blood bilirubin initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using ELISA assay (IU/L).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (h) alkaline phosphatase level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Alkaline phosphatase level initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using ELISA assay (IU/L).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (i) creatine level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Creatine level initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using ELISA assay (IU/L).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (j) blood sodium
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Sodium level initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using a blood gas analyser (mM).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 1: clinical HEMATOLOGY parameters (k) blood potassium
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Potassium level initially and any subsequent changes to be determined using a blood gas analyser (mM).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (a) presence of leukocytes
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (negative = grey, positive = increase in purple color intensity).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (b) presence of nitrites
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (negative = yellow, positive = increase in pink color intensity).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (c) level of urobilinogen
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (normal = 0.2-1 mg/dL, yellow; raised = 2-8 mg/dL, with increasing pink intensity).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (d) presence of protein
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (none or trace amounts (quince); raised = increased darkness of green pigment)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (e) pH
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (dual pigment assay, represented by color change from fading of orange (pH 5) to increased darkness of green pigment (pH 8.5).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (f) presence of blood
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (none = yellow; trace amounts of non-hemolysed blood (dark-green speckle discoloration on a yellow background); presence of hemolysed blood (increasing darkness of green pigment on yellow background).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (g) specific gravity (SG)
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (Dark green = 1.000, yellow-green = 1.030; increasing SG correlates with decreasing darkness of green pigment.
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (h) ketone level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (none = beige; trace (pink = 5, increasing to large (160) mg/dL with increasing darkness of burgundy pigment)
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (i) presence of bilirubin
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested initially and any subsequent changes determined colorimetrically (negative = yellow; increasing levels correlate with appearance of light brown pigment).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (j) glucose level
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested and measured, and subsequent changes determined colorimetrically for content of glucose (absence = blue-green; presence = range form 100 (green) to > 2000 mg/dL (dark brown).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Safety assessment 2: URINALYSIS (k) presence of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)
Time Frame: Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Urine will be dipstick tested and measured colorimetrically for presence of hCG (positive test = appearance of blue line on white background; negative = remains white).
Performed at screening (week -2), baseline (Week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Determination of total usage of PRESCRIPTION ANALGESICS
Time Frame: Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks
Usage of any analgesics will be recorded on a daily basis by subjects using diary, which will be reviewed at clinical consultation. Total consumption will be logged at the end of the supplemention period as an indicator of changes in reliance on prescribed medications. (expressed as number of medications per day, regardless of type).
Screening (week -2), baseline (week 0); rescored at 12, 24, 36 and 40 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Krzysztof Wilczek, MD, Coramed, Wroklaw

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Tregocel®

3
Subscribe