Sociocultural & Biobehavioral Influences on Pain Expression and Assessment

Objective

The current proposal investigates behavioral, psychophysiological, and social processes that may help explain biases and disparate outcomes in pain. Health disparities, or health outcomes that adversely affect disadvantaged populations, are pervasive and apparent in many diseases and symptoms, including pain. Pain is the number one reason individuals seek medical treatment. Health disparities in pain encompass both differences in pain experience and treatment for pain. For instance, research indicates that Black individuals report increased pain and have reduced pain tolerance relative to White individuals, yet doctors are less likely to treat minority patients pain and underestimate their pain experience. This project aims to address this systemic discrepancy by focusing on interpersonal processes that may contribute to these disparities, including socially-relevant responses to pain (i.e. pain expression) and pain assessment (e.g. visual attention). The proposed research aims to determine whether the study of pain expressions and their assessment can yield insights on how social factors shape pain and its treatment. Further, we test the efficacy of potential interventions designed to improve accuracy and reduce biases in pain assessment. If successful, this work will form the foundation of a new research program that will link the field of pain research with the field of social neuroscience, and forge new insights on the critical problem of health disparities in pain.

Study population

We will accrue up to 700 total healthy volunteers to target 240 completers

Design

Our overall aim is to understand how social factors influence the assessment and management of pain, and to gain insight into psychosocial processes that may underlie health disparities in pain. We propose a series of studies designed to test these links. First, we will measure pain perception and physiological responses to painful stimuli in a diverse group of individuals to test for sociocultural and biological influences on pain and pain-related responses. In subsequent studies, new participants ("perceivers") will view images of these initial participants ("targets") and will provide estimates of 'targets' pain experience. We will measure a) whether perceivers can accurately estimate 'targets' pain experience; b) whether accuracy differs as a function of similarity between target and perceiver (ingroup vs outgroup); and c) whether individuals can improve accuracy through feedback.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures for all experiments will be decisions about pain (experienced by self or other) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, and/or categorical judgments (pain/no pain). We will also measure physiological responses (e.g., facial muscle response, skin conductance, pupil dilation) and brain responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as secondary outcome measures. We will test whether pain and pain-related responses varies as a function of sociocultural/demographic factors (e.g. race, ethnicity, sex) and whether accuracy in assessing others' pain is influenced by group similarity (i.e. ingroup vs. outgroup) and training (e.g. performance-related feedback)....

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective

The current proposal investigates behavioral, psychophysiological, and social processes that may help explain biases and disparate outcomes in pain. Health disparities, or health outcomes that adversely affect disadvantaged populations, are pervasive and apparent in many diseases and symptoms, including pain. Pain is the number one reason individuals seek medical treatment. Health disparities in pain encompass both differences in pain experience and treatment for pain. For instance, research indicates that Black individuals report increased pain and have reduced pain tolerance relative to White individuals, yet doctors are less likely to treat minority patients' pain and underestimate their pain experience. This project aims to address this systemic discrepancy by focusing on interpersonal processes that may contribute to these disparities, including socially-relevant responses to pain (i.e. pain expression) and pain assessment (e.g. visual attention). The proposed research aims to determine whether the study of pain expressions and their assessment can yield insights on how social factors shape pain and its treatment. Further, we test the efficacy of potential interventions designed to improve accuracy and reduce biases in pain assessment. If successful, this work will form the foundation of a new research program that will link the field of pain research with the field of social neuroscience, and forge new insights on the critical problem of health disparities in pain.

Study population

We will accrue up to 700 total healthy volunteers to target 240 completers.

Design

Our overall aim is to understand how social factors influence the assessment and management of pain, and to gain insight into psychosocial processes that may underlie health disparities in pain. We propose a series of studies designed to test these links. First, we will measure pain perception and physiological responses to painful stimuli in a diverse group of individuals to test for sociocultural and biological influences on pain and pain-related responses. In subsequent studies, new participants ("perceivers") will view images of these initial participants ("targets") and will provide estimates of 'targets' pain experience. We will measure a) whether perceivers can accurately estimate 'targets' pain experience; b) whether accuracy differs as a function of similarity between target and perceiver (ingroup vs outgroup); and c) whether individuals can improve accuracy through feedback.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures for all experiments will be decisions about pain (experienced by self or other) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, and/or categorical judgments (pain/no pain). We will also measure physiological responses (e.g., facial muscle response, skin conductance, pupil dilation) and brain responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as secondary outcome measures. We will test whether pain and pain-related responses varies as a function of sociocultural/demographic factors (e.g. race, ethnicity, sex) and whether accuracy in assessing others' pain is influenced by group similarity (i.e. ingroup vs. outgroup) and training (e.g. performance-related feedback).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • Recruiting
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
        • Contact:
          • For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact Office of Patient Recruitment (OPR)
          • Phone Number: TTY8664111010 800-411-1222
          • Email: prpl@cc.nih.gov

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

All Sub-Studies:

  • Healthy
  • Between 18 and 60 years old
  • Fluent in English
  • Able to provide written informed consent

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

All Sub-Studies:

  • Unable to comply with study procedures
  • Has a major-medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect ability to comply with study procedures, including neurological conditions (including stroke, blindness or deafness, or a history of brain damage)
  • Has a current mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder, or has a history of psychosis, hospitalization for a mental health condition, or recurrent psychiatric episodes.
  • NIH staff member who is a subordinate/relative/co-worker of any investigator on the protocol
  • Prior completion of a different sub-study within this protocol.
  • Is born outside of the states or territories of the United States of America
  • Does not currently reside in a state or territory of the United States of America

Sub-study 1:

  • Has a major-medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect heat sensitivity or pain thresholds. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, or neurological conditions or a chronic systemic disease (e.g., diabetes)
  • Has a medical condition that in a clinician's assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud's disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder)
  • Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months)
  • Has a dermatological condition affecting the testing region, such as scars, burns, or recent tattoos that might influence cutaneous sensibility
  • Regular use of prescription medication that has a significant effect on pain or heat perception. Excluded medications include central-acting agents such as opiates (morphine, tramadol), antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran), anticonvulsants (gabapentin, pregabalin), anxiolytics (barbituates, benzodiazepines), hypnotics (zolpidem, sodium oxybate), antipsychotics (valproate, lithium, olanzapine), antimigraine agents (sumatriptan, ergotamine), and muscle relaxants (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol). Use of analgesic medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, salicylates, and acetaminophen, taken on an "as needed" basis is acceptable as long as the last dose was not taken was within 5 half-lives of testing.
  • Is left handed

Sub-study 4, FMRI participants:

  • Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months)
  • Is left-handed
  • Any FMRI contraindications, including:

    • Ferromagnetic metal in the cranial cavity or eye, e.g. aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign body.
    • Implanted cardiac pacemaker or auto-defibrillator.
    • Insulin pump.
    • Irremovable body piercing.
  • Pregnant women (based on urine test completed within 24 hours prior to scan).
  • Those with an abnormality on a structural MRI that has functional consequences based on clinician assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Substudy 1: All participants
Measuring facial response to painful stimulation.
Heat pain stimulation for substudy 1
Electric pain stimulation for substudy 1
Cold pain stimulation for substudy 1
No Intervention: Substudy 2: Healthy volunteers
Measuring pain assessment accuracy
No Intervention: Substudy 3: Control
Subjects will judge stimuli with the same instructions as Sub-Study 2 (which provides a test of replication).
Experimental: Substudy 3: Feedback Group
Participants in substudy 3's Feedback Group will be informed about their performance after every trial when making judgments about other people's pain.
Participants in substudy 3's Feedback Group will be informed about their performance after every trial when making judgments about other people's pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological responses (facial muscle movement, skin conductance, respiration, pupil dilation, eye gaze position)
Time Frame: Every visit
We measure facial responses to painful stimuli in substudy 1 and eye position in substudy 2 and 3.
Every visit
Pain perception (pain ratings)
Time Frame: Every visit
Individuals report their perceived pain or the pain they associate with other people they are viewing.
Every visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire measures (e.g. Fear of Pain questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire)
Time Frame: Every visit
We collect measures of identity and endorsement of beliefs about pain.
Every visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren Y Atlas, Ph.D., National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 17, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data will be shared with other researchers as per the protocol. Identifiable data (i.e. images of faces) from participants who consent to data sharing may be shared with other researchers. Finally, identifiable data from participants who opt to be included in a stimulus set through the sub-study 1 consent form can be shown to other participants and in other studies to measure evaluation of facial responses to pain.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Face stimuli are available following completion for viewing by other study participants. Deidentified data will be made available upon publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

please see above.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Medoc thermal stimulator

Subscribe