Acceptance and Preference of Lidocaine Gel Compared to Injection Anesthesia After Non Surgical Periodontal Treatment

December 19, 2018 updated by: Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & CO GmbH

Multicenter, Randomized, Split-mouth Study to Evaluate the Acceptance and Preference of Lidocaine Gel Compared to Injection Anesthesia After Non Surgical Periodontal Treatment

This project is a national, open label, multicenter, randomized split-mouth study in patients from 18 to 70 years of age to compare the efficacy and acceptability of lidocaine gel compared to injection anesthesia with articaine (infiltration anesthesia for the upper jaw and infiltration or nerve block anesthesia for the lower jaw). It is planned that about 90 patients with a proven moderate periodontitis will be enrolled in 5 German study centers.

Dynexan Mundgel® (lidocaine hydrochloride) is a topical anesthetic gel containing lidocaine that is commercially available as an anesthetic for temporary, symptomatic treatment of pain at the oral mucosa, gingiva and lips. The gold standard for scaling and root planing (SRP) is still the use of injection anesthesia. This raises the question what kind of anesthesia patients would prefer if they had a free choice.

For this study Ultracaine® D-S 1:200,000 (articaine hydrochloride/epinephrine hydrochloride) was selected as the injectable comparator drug because it is the most frequently used anesthetic drug for infiltration and nerve-block anesthesia in Germany at present.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 14197
        • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité Centrum Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde CC 3
    • Bavaria
      • Röttenbach, Bavaria, Germany, 91341
        • Praxis Dr. Heckel
    • Bayern
      • Würzburg, Bayern, Germany, 97070
        • Praxis Dr. Petersilka
    • Hessen
      • Marburg, Hessen, Germany, 35033
        • Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Zahnerhaltungskunde und Parodontologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent must be available
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other study procedures
  • Patient systemically healthy except for controlled diabetes and hypertension
  • Patients with comparable periodontal status of the right and left jaw, with ≥ 3 teeth with pockets ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 7 mm per quadrant
  • Female patients of childbearing potential must practice highly effective contraception methods

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Generalized severe periodontitis with pockets > 8 mm
  • More than 2 pockets > 7 mm and ≤ 8 mm per quadrant
  • Contraindicated for treatment with the investigational product, the comparator drug, or meet warnings and precautions for use specifications in accordance with the approved SmPCs as follows:

    • Hypersensitivity to the investigational product, the comparator drug or to any of their respective excipients
    • Hypersensitivity to other local anesthetics of the amide type
    • Severe uncontrolled and untreated excitation and conduction disorder of the heart
    • Acute decompensated heart failure
    • Severe renal or hepatic disease/dysfunction
    • Untreated or uncontrolled diabetes type 2
    • Severe hypertension and severe hypotension
    • Narrow-angle glaucoma
    • Hyperthyroidism
    • Paroxysmal tachycardia or high-frequency absolute arrhythmia
    • Myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
    • Coronary artery bypass within the last 3 months
    • Concurrent use of non-cardio selective beta blockers (e.g. propranolol)
    • Pheochromocytoma
    • Concurrent treatment with tri-cyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors
  • Use of painkillers or anti-inflammatory drugs 24 hours before the first treatment
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment with antibiotics
  • Use of any anxiolytic medication
  • Periodontal treatment within the last 3 months
  • Continuing orthodontic treatment
  • Concurrent use of another investigational medication
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the last 3 months
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy while enrolled in the study
  • Persons who are in a dependency or working relationship with the sponsor or investigator
  • A subject who, in the opinion of the investigator will be uncooperative or unable to comply with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine/Articaine
Lidocaine Hydrochloride 1% Gel anesthesia / Articaine hydrochloride/epinephrine (adrenaline) hydrochloride anesthesia
Cylinder vials with 1.7 g gel containing 34 mg lidocaine (1 g gel contains 20 mg lidocaine) will be used. Application of the gel into the periodontal pockets or the sulcus according to summary of product characteristics (SmPC). A total dose of 40 mg lidocaine should not be exceeded.
Other Names:
  • Dynexan Mundgel®
Cylinder vials with 1.7 ml solution for injection containing 68 mg articaine and 0.0102 mg epinephrine (1 ml contains 40 mg articaine and 0.006 mg epinephrine) will be used. Infiltration anesthesia for the upper jaw and infiltration or nerve block anesthesia for the lower jaw with articaine solution for injection according to SmPC. Adults can be treated with up to 7 mg articaine per kg of body weight per treatment session.
Other Names:
  • Ultracain® D-S 1:200,000
Experimental: Articaine/Lidocaine
Articaine hydrochloride/epinephrine (adrenaline) hydrochloride anesthesia / Lidocaine Hydrochloride 1% Gel anesthesia
Cylinder vials with 1.7 g gel containing 34 mg lidocaine (1 g gel contains 20 mg lidocaine) will be used. Application of the gel into the periodontal pockets or the sulcus according to summary of product characteristics (SmPC). A total dose of 40 mg lidocaine should not be exceeded.
Other Names:
  • Dynexan Mundgel®
Cylinder vials with 1.7 ml solution for injection containing 68 mg articaine and 0.0102 mg epinephrine (1 ml contains 40 mg articaine and 0.006 mg epinephrine) will be used. Infiltration anesthesia for the upper jaw and infiltration or nerve block anesthesia for the lower jaw with articaine solution for injection according to SmPC. Adults can be treated with up to 7 mg articaine per kg of body weight per treatment session.
Other Names:
  • Ultracain® D-S 1:200,000

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptance and preference of topical lidocaine mouth gel anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose of second treatment
To compare acceptance and preference of topical lidocaine mouth gel anesthesia vs. injection anesthesia with articaine in patients undergoing subgingival debridement by comparing the proportion of patients after the second periodontal treatment who prefer topical anesthesia with lidocaine gel against the injection anesthesia with articaine to a proportion of 0.5; the patient rates the preferred anesthesia method on a questionnaire by stating if the patient's preference is treatment with anesthetic gel, treatment with anesthetic injection, or no preference
1 hour post-dose of second treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of pain
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Comparative assessment of pain the patients experienced during treatment; a visual analogue scale (100mm, 0 = no pain, 100 = maximum pain) will be used for maximum pain and average pain Rating after each treatment visit
1 hour post-dose
Side Effects
Time Frame: 1, 5, 25 hours post-dose
Evaluate type and number of side effects (incl. after-effects due to study Treatment up to 24h after each treatment visit by use of a patient diary)
1, 5, 25 hours post-dose
Handling/Application
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Compare the handling/application of both methods; the treating physician rates the handling/application on a questionnaire by using German school grades (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = adequate, 5 = inadequate, 6 = insufficient) after each treatment visit.
1 hour post-dose
Onset of anesthetic effect
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Compare the onset of anesthetic effect in both treatment groups; the treating physician rates the onset of the anesthetic effect on a questionnaire by using German school grades (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = adequate, 5 = inadequate, 6 = insufficient) after each treatment visit.
1 hour post-dose
Duration of anesthetic effect
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Compare the duration of anesthetic effect in both treatment groups; the treating physician rates the duration of the anesthetic effect on a questionnaire by using German school grades (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = adequate, 5 = inadequate, 6 = insufficient) after each treatment visit.
1 hour post-dose
Patient compliance
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Compare the patient compliance in both treatment groups; the treating physician rates the patient compliance on a questionnaire by using German school grades (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = adequate, 5 = inadequate, 6 = insufficient) after each treatment visit.
1 hour post-dose
Treating physicians preference
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose of second treatment
Evaluation which of the anesthetic methods the treating physician prefers. The treating physician rates the preferred anesthesia method on a questionnaire by stating if the treating physician's preference is treatment with anesthetic gel, treatment with anesthetic injection, or no preference
1 hour post-dose of second treatment
Anesthesia re-application/rescue anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Assess the number of re-application of the anesthetic gel or the rescue anesthesia injections that are required in every treatment group
1 hour post-dose
Overall patient satisfaction with anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose
Evaluation of the overall patient satisfaction with anesthesia. The patient rates the overall satisfaction on a questionnaire by using German school grades (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = adequate, 5 = inadequate, 6 = insufficient) after each treatment visit.
1 hour post-dose
Willingness to pay
Time Frame: 1 hour post-dose of second treatment
Evaluation of the willingness to pay for lidocaine gel by using a questionnaire (willingness to pay 0, 1-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 or >20 €)
1 hour post-dose of second treatment
Re-Evaluation of patients preference
Time Frame: 25 hours post-dose of second treatment
Re-evaluation of preference of topical lidocaine mouth gel anesthesia vs. injection anesthesia with articaine 24 h after end of last treatment. The patient again rates the preferred anesthesia method by stating if his/her preference is treatment with anesthetic gel, treatment with anesthetic injection, or no preference. The preference 24 h after end of last treatment is collected by using the patient diary.
25 hours post-dose of second treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine Hydrochloride 1% Gel

Subscribe