Patient Satisfaction and Retention of Upper Complete Denture Base Using Rapid Prototyping Versus a Conventional One

June 11, 2018 updated by: Omar Mahmoud Youssef, Cairo University

Patient Satisfaction and Retention of Upper Complete Denture Base Using Rapid Prototyping Versus a Conventional One: Randomized Control Trial

Comparing patient satisfaction and retention of upper complete denture fabricated using two different denture base materials, the first fabricated using rapid prototyping method while the second is following conventional methods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Searching for other materials or other fabrication technologies has been one of the goals to help to re-innovate the fabrication of complete dentures , which would greatly influence completely edentulous Patient satisfaction. The introduction of rapid prototyping (RP)Stereo lithography (SLA) technology has many advantage as high accuracy, high mechanical strength, smooth surface finish with close tolerance and fine details printing, but it has some limitation as it is only limited Material, in addition to the high material and equipment cost.

SLA has been used in dental fields like maxillofacial prosthesis , wax pattern fabrication for crown bridge , removable partial denture 19, but still complete denture was reported in a very few reports indicating that RP is not yet successfully applied in Complete denture manufacturing 19-21A randomised trial is therefore needed to asses accurately wether the introduction of rapid prototyping in complete denture fabrication is successful or not in comparison to the conventional technique and to discover the possible challenges in this recent technique and the ways to overcome it.

Retention of complete dentures and patient satisfaction has been reported in many studies22-26. Patients have showed a higher satisfaction, as retention of both maxillary and mandibular complete dentures increased.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ranging from 40-70 years.
  2. Patients who can understand and respond to a written questionnaire in Arabic.
  3. Cooperative patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathological changes of residual ridges.
  2. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases.
  3. Patients with xerostomia.
  4. Patients with flabby and flat ridges.
  5. Patients with allergy to acrylic resin
  6. Patient with sever undercuts, or irregular bony exostosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Rapid prototyping Denture base
Complete Denture Using Rapid Prototyping method for fabrication of the complete denture depending on
The introduction of rapid prototyping (RP)Stereo lithography (SLA) technology, which mainly depends on addition of layers of materials which would be polymerized using a light curing unit. It consists of a bath of photo polymerized liquid and ultraviolet unit for curing these layers, that would bond to each other till forming the full object. SLA has many advantage as high accuracy, high mechanical strength, smooth surface finish with close tolerance and fine details printing, but it has some limitation as it is only limited Material, in addition to the high material and equipment cost.
Sham Comparator: Heat Cured Conventional Complete Denture
Complete Denture using heat cured Denture base using flasking and deflasking method
it is the main treatment for most of completely edentoulous Cases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 month
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire using likert scale five points represent degree of satisfaction and compare the result to each other
3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: 3 month
resistance to tissue away movement using digital force meter and recording the average of 10 reading in one time and compare the results of the two denture
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2717

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complete Denture

Clinical Trials on Rapid prototyping Denture base

Subscribe