Cryopreservation of White Blood Cells Before Their UVA Irradiation for Graft Versus Host Disease Treatment (cryo-ECP)

January 23, 2020 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Division and Cryopreservation of Autologous Blood Nuclear Cells for Intensive Regimen of Extracorporeal Photopheresis : Interest for the Treatment of Patients With Steroid Resistant Graft Versus Host Disease

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a worldwide recognized treatment of acute and chronic mild to moderate graft versus host disease (GVHD), in second or further line of treatment. Contrary to immunosuppressive drugs, ECP is not associated with side effects such as opportunistic infections, and is not associated with a higher frequency of relapse of the initial hematological disease. High intensity of ECP regimen (1 to 3 sessions per week, in case of chronic or acute GVHD) seems to be correlated to a higher efficacy. However, high intensity of ECP treatment is often difficult to sustain, because of frequent logistical problems to perform aphereses, such as venous access failure, infections of central line, deep blood cytopenias that require many transfusions before performing aphereses. Merlin et al. first described the feasibility of white blood cells cryopreservation before UVA irradiation, in vitro, then in vivo. We also recently reported the feasibility and efficacy of cryopreserved ECP in a series of 20 patients (adults and children), with acute and chronic GVHD, who had recurrent contraindications to aphereses, that prevented the realization of an intensive program of ECP. No adverse events occurred, and efficacy seemed to be similar to "classical" ECP (35% of complete overall response, and 40% of partial response). White blood cells (WBC) were divided after collection on Optia or Cellex apheresis machines: one was immediately treated with 8-MOP (methoxsalen) and ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation, while the other was cryopreserved, and further (a few days later) thawed, sensitized with 8-MOP and irradiated before injection to the patient.

The aim of this study is to analyze this method in a prospective way, with complete biological data collection, of apoptosis, cytokines release etc…, necessary to the full description of cryopreservation of white blood cells before their irradiation and reinjection to the patient.

We will propose this technique of cryopreservation to every patient with an indication of ECP for acute or chronic GVHD in Nancy Hospital for 18 months.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The main objective of this prospective interventional pilot study is to demonstrate the ability of this technique to follow high intensity regimen recommendations, as mentioned above:

  • 3 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade III to IV acute GVHD, then
  • 2 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade II acute GVHD
  • 1 ECP session per week for chronic GVHD during 3 months

The other objectives are:

  • To describe the safety and efficacy of cryo ECP. Efficacy will be assessed with a composite criteria test, comporting 5 items, which will be compared for each patient with a paired cohort of historical patients treated in Nancy University Hospital since 2010 (match will be made on type and grade of GVHD, and age under and over 18 year-old)
  • To fully describe the biological consequences of cryopreservation of WBC before UVA irradiation: apoptosis rate and time, lymphocyte functional tests (lymphoblastic transformation test), cytokines release, number of lymphocytes, and monocytes at the time of reinjection, bacteriological tests, residual diméthylsulfoxyde (DMSO) quantification
  • To demonstrate the decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion number, due to the sparing effect of cryo ECP on aphereses number.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult or child who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a medical follow-up at the University Hospital of Nancy, or at the other University Hospitals in the great East region (Dijon, Reims, Besançon) in which ECP is not accessible.
  • Eligible for ECP for the treatment of acute or chronic steroid refractory GVHD, after pluridisciplinary concertations
  • Patients (or parents) who received full information on the research and who signed a consent for this research

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Children under 10 kg of weight
  • Patients or parents who did not sign a consent
  • Patients who present an absolute contra-indication for apheresis: recent pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, active and evolutive bacterial or fungal infection, hemodynamics instability, deep anemia (Hb < 8g/dl) or deep thrombocytopenia (< 20 g/L) despite transfusions, severe hypocalcemia.
  • Women in age to procreate without contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intensity of ECP regimen
Time Frame: 3 months after the first ECP session
Number of ECP (fresh and thawed) sessions during 3 months
3 months after the first ECP session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
systemic infections during 3 months after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
occurrence of death after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
occurrence of relapse of the initial hematological disease after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
Steroid sparing effect (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
GVHD grade (severity) (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
immunosuppressive drugs used (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APJC2015/CRYOPCE-POCHON/NK

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Graft Versus Host Disease

Clinical Trials on cryopreservation

Subscribe