- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03361254
Cryopreservation of White Blood Cells Before Their UVA Irradiation for Graft Versus Host Disease Treatment (cryo-ECP)
Division and Cryopreservation of Autologous Blood Nuclear Cells for Intensive Regimen of Extracorporeal Photopheresis : Interest for the Treatment of Patients With Steroid Resistant Graft Versus Host Disease
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a worldwide recognized treatment of acute and chronic mild to moderate graft versus host disease (GVHD), in second or further line of treatment. Contrary to immunosuppressive drugs, ECP is not associated with side effects such as opportunistic infections, and is not associated with a higher frequency of relapse of the initial hematological disease. High intensity of ECP regimen (1 to 3 sessions per week, in case of chronic or acute GVHD) seems to be correlated to a higher efficacy. However, high intensity of ECP treatment is often difficult to sustain, because of frequent logistical problems to perform aphereses, such as venous access failure, infections of central line, deep blood cytopenias that require many transfusions before performing aphereses. Merlin et al. first described the feasibility of white blood cells cryopreservation before UVA irradiation, in vitro, then in vivo. We also recently reported the feasibility and efficacy of cryopreserved ECP in a series of 20 patients (adults and children), with acute and chronic GVHD, who had recurrent contraindications to aphereses, that prevented the realization of an intensive program of ECP. No adverse events occurred, and efficacy seemed to be similar to "classical" ECP (35% of complete overall response, and 40% of partial response). White blood cells (WBC) were divided after collection on Optia or Cellex apheresis machines: one was immediately treated with 8-MOP (methoxsalen) and ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation, while the other was cryopreserved, and further (a few days later) thawed, sensitized with 8-MOP and irradiated before injection to the patient.
The aim of this study is to analyze this method in a prospective way, with complete biological data collection, of apoptosis, cytokines release etc…, necessary to the full description of cryopreservation of white blood cells before their irradiation and reinjection to the patient.
We will propose this technique of cryopreservation to every patient with an indication of ECP for acute or chronic GVHD in Nancy Hospital for 18 months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The main objective of this prospective interventional pilot study is to demonstrate the ability of this technique to follow high intensity regimen recommendations, as mentioned above:
- 3 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade III to IV acute GVHD, then
- 2 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade II acute GVHD
- 1 ECP session per week for chronic GVHD during 3 months
The other objectives are:
- To describe the safety and efficacy of cryo ECP. Efficacy will be assessed with a composite criteria test, comporting 5 items, which will be compared for each patient with a paired cohort of historical patients treated in Nancy University Hospital since 2010 (match will be made on type and grade of GVHD, and age under and over 18 year-old)
- To fully describe the biological consequences of cryopreservation of WBC before UVA irradiation: apoptosis rate and time, lymphocyte functional tests (lymphoblastic transformation test), cytokines release, number of lymphocytes, and monocytes at the time of reinjection, bacteriological tests, residual diméthylsulfoxyde (DMSO) quantification
- To demonstrate the decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion number, due to the sparing effect of cryo ECP on aphereses number.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult or child who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a medical follow-up at the University Hospital of Nancy, or at the other University Hospitals in the great East region (Dijon, Reims, Besançon) in which ECP is not accessible.
- Eligible for ECP for the treatment of acute or chronic steroid refractory GVHD, after pluridisciplinary concertations
- Patients (or parents) who received full information on the research and who signed a consent for this research
Non inclusion Criteria:
- Children under 10 kg of weight
- Patients or parents who did not sign a consent
- Patients who present an absolute contra-indication for apheresis: recent pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, active and evolutive bacterial or fungal infection, hemodynamics instability, deep anemia (Hb < 8g/dl) or deep thrombocytopenia (< 20 g/L) despite transfusions, severe hypocalcemia.
- Women in age to procreate without contraception
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
intensity of ECP regimen
Time Frame: 3 months after the first ECP session
|
Number of ECP (fresh and thawed) sessions during 3 months
|
3 months after the first ECP session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
systemic infections during 3 months after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
|
occurrence of death after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
|
occurrence of relapse of the initial hematological disease after cryo-ECP (safety)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
|
Steroid sparing effect (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
|
GVHD grade (severity) (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
|
immunosuppressive drugs used (efficacy)
Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APJC2015/CRYOPCE-POCHON/NK
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Graft Versus Host Disease
-
University of LiegeTerminatedChronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease | Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease | Steroid Refractory Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseBelgium
-
Grupo Espanol de trasplantes hematopoyeticos y...CompletedChronic Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseSpain
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedAcute-graft-versus-host Disease | Graft-versus-host DiseaseUnited States, Belgium, United Kingdom, Greece, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Canada, Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, Portugal
-
Mesoblast, Inc.Quintiles, Inc.CompletedGrade B Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Grade C Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Grade D Acute Graft Versus Host DiseaseUnited States
-
John LevineCompletedGVHD | Low Risk Acute Graft-versus-host Disease | Graft-versus-host-diseaseUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmTerminatedGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseSweden
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterCompletedGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedGraft vs Host Disease | Graft-Versus-Host Disease | Chronic Graft vs. Host DiseaseUnited States
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNovartisCompletedGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on cryopreservation
-
Bruce Shapiro M.D.Completed
-
Southwest Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationUnknown
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandCompleted
-
Overture LifeRecruiting
-
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI AlicanteIgenomixCompleted
-
Vlad RadulescuCompletedCancer | Infertility | Rheumatologic Disorder | Hematologic DisorderUnited States
-
Sophie DebrockCompletedCryopreservation of EmbryosBelgium
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompleted
-
St. Justine's HospitalNot yet recruitingCancer | Infertility | Ovarian Failure | Hematologic DisorderCanada