- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03339297
An Open-Label Study of Defibrotide for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (AGvHD)
A Phase 2, Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study on the Efficacy of Defibrotide Added to Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease in Adult and Pediatric Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
- Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck
-
Linz, Austria, 4020
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen GmbH
-
-
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1200
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-luc
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
- UZ Gent
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
-
-
-
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1756
- Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases - Sofia
-
-
-
-
-
Montreal, Canada, H3T 1C5
- Sainte Justine Hospital
-
Montreal, Canada, H1T 2M4
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
-
Montreal, Canada, H4A 3J1
- McGill University Health Center
-
-
-
-
-
Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
- Klinichki Bolnicki Centar Zagreb
-
-
-
-
-
Clamart, France, 92141
- Hospital d Instructions des Armees Percy
-
Lille, France, 59037
- CHRU Lille
-
Toulouse, France, 31059
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole
-
Villejuif, France, 94805
- Institut Gustave Roussy
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13125
- HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch
-
Bochum, Germany, 44892
- Medizinische Universitätsklinik Knappschaftskrankenhaus
-
Brandenburg, Germany, 15236
- Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH
-
Dresden, Germany, 01307
- Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
-
Göttingen, Germany, 37075
- University Medicine Gottingen Germany
-
Halle, Germany, 06120
- Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale)
-
Köln, Germany, 50937
- Uniklinik Koln
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
-
Mannheim, Germany, 68167
- Klinikum Mannheim Universitätsklinikum gGmbH
-
Munchen, Germany, 81675
- Klinikum Rechts Der Isar Der Technischen Universität München
-
Regensburg, Germany, 93053
- Klinikum der Universität Regensburg
-
-
-
-
-
Athens, Greece, 12462
- Attikon University General Hospital
-
Patras, Greece, 26500
- University General Hospital of Patras
-
-
-
-
-
Milano, Italy, 20162
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda - Presidio Ospedaliero Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
-
Parma, Italy, 41236
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
-
Roma, Italy, 00165
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
-
-
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 00-001
- Centrum Onkologii im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
-
Wrocław, Poland, 53-439
- Dolnośląskie Centrum Transplantacji Komórkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawców Szpiku
-
-
-
-
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1099
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E.
-
-
-
-
-
Coruña, Spain, 15006
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
-
Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain, 35010
- Hospital de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín
-
Madrid, Spain, 28222
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
-
Salamanca, Spain, 37007
- Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - H. Clinico
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
-
Valencia, Spain, 41013
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
-
-
-
-
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
-
Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
- St James University Hospital
-
Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
- St. James University Hospital
-
Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
- Leicester Royal Infirmary
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
- Manchester Royal Infirmary
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
- USC Norris Cancer Center
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
- Stanford University
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- University of California, San Francisco Medical Center
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
- Mayo Clinic Jacksonville - PPDS
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
- Blood & Marrow Transplant Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University Hospital
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
-
-
Kansas
-
Westwood, Kansas, United States, 66205
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
- Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- MUSC-Hollings Cancer Center
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System
-
-
West Virginia
-
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
- West Virginia University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant must be ≥1 year of age at screening and undergoing allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).
- Participant must be diagnosed with acute leukemia in morphologic complete remission (CR1 or CR2) or with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with no circulating blasts and with less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow
- Participant must have planned to receive either a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and have an unrelated donor who is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched or single-allele mismatched
Participant must receive the following medical regimen as part of standard of care immunoprophylaxis for GvHD in either study arm at doses and regimen determined by local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and participant need:
Methotrexate (MTX) or Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + calcineurin inhibitor (Cyclosporine A [CSA] or Tacrolimus [TAC]) +/- Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (ATG use is limited to 30% of participants).
- Graft must be a CD3+ T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft or non-manipulated bone marrow (BM) graft.
- Adult participants must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. For pediatric participants, the parent/legal guardian or representative must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. Assent, when appropriate, will be obtained according to institutional guidelines.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participant has had a prior autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
- Participant is using or plans to use an investigational agent for the prevention of GvHD.
- Participant is receiving or plans to receive other investigational therapy and/or is enrolled or plans to enroll in a separate clinical study.
- Participant, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study.
- Participant has a psychiatric illness that would prevent the participant or legal guardian or representative from giving informed consent and/or assent.
- Participant has a serious active disease or co-morbid medical condition, as judged by the investigator, which would interfere with the conduct of this study.
- Participant is pregnant or lactating and does not agree to stop breastfeeding.
- Any other condition that would cause a risk to the participant if he/she participated in the trial.
- Participant has a known history of hypersensitivity to defibrotide or any of the excipients.
Participant had acute bleeding that is clinically significant within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, defined as either of the following:
- Hemorrhage requiring >15 cc/kg of packed red blood cells (eg, pediatric participant weighing 20 kg and requiring 300 cc packed red blood cells/24 hours, or an adult weighing >70 kg and requiring 3 units of packed red blood cells/24hours) to replace blood loss, or
- Bleeding from a site which, in the investigator's opinion, constituted a potential life-threatening source (eg, pulmonary hemorrhage or central nervous system bleeding), irrespective of amount of blood loss
- Participant used any medication that increases the risk of bleeding within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, including, but not limited to, systemic heparin, low molecular weight heparin, heparin analogs, alteplase, streptokinase, urokinase, antithrombin III, oral anticoagulants including warfarin, and other agents that increase the risk of bleeding. Participants may have received heparin or other anticoagulants for routine central venous line management and intermittent dialysis or ultrafiltration. Fibrinolytic instillation for central venous line occlusion was also permitted. Note: Heparin used to keep catheters open was allowed (up to 100 U/kg/day).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Defibrotide Prophylaxis
Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis + Defibrotide
|
6.25 mg/kg via 2-hour IV infusion every 6 hours
Administered according to local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and patient need.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard of Care
Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis Alone
|
Administered according to local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and patient need.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGvHD) by Day +100 Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) Severity Index.
Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD by Day +180 Post-HSCT
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index.
Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Grade B to D aGvHD-free Survival by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index.
Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index.
Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Disease Relapse by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
Disease relapse was defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) consistent with pre-transplant features, documented or not by biopsy.
The event was defined as an increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease, documented or not by biopsy.
Disease relapse was diagnosed when there was morphological or clinical evidence of the following: reappearance of leukemia blast cells in the peripheral blood, or >5% blasts in the bone marrow (BM), not attributable to another cause (eg, BM regeneration), or the appearance of previous or new dysplastic changes (MDS specific) within the BM, with or without falling donor chimerism, or the development of extramedullary leukemia or leukemic cells in the cerebral spinal fluid, or institution of therapy to treat relapsed disease, including donor lymphocyte infusion.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Systemic Steroids for the Treatment of aGvHD +180 Days Post-HSCT
Time Frame: HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
For each treatment arm, the cumulative incidence rate of systemic steroid use for the treatment of aGvHD by Day +180 post-HSCT will be estimated using the cumulative incidence competing risk estimator.
The calculation of the cumulative incidence rates and the stratified Gray's test was carried out using the LIFETEST procedure in SAS version 9.4.
If the participant experienced a competing risk event, then the initiation date was used to calculate the time-to-event variable.
|
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Physical Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT physical wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Social/Family Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT social/family wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Emotional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT emotional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT functional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale (BMTS) as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT-BMT subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the General (FACT-G) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The FACT-General (FACT-G) is a core component of the FACT-BMT, and includes 4 of the 5 subscales included in the FACT-BMT total score (FACT physical wellbeing score, FACT social/family wellbeing score, FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score).
In line with this similarity, results of the FACT-G exhibited the same pattern as described for the FACT-BMT total score.
The FACT-G scores range from a minimParticipants were age ≥16 years at baseline.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the FACT-BMT Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
The FACT-BMT total score range is from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant-Trial Outcomes Index (FACT-BMT-TOI)
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The FACT-BMT-TOI is defined as the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale.
Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 96, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes Measured Based on the EQ-5D-5L Index Value for Health States
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The 5-Level EuroQol-5D health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index value, which is country-specific, was only performed for participants in the US.
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
Change from the baseline assessment to Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT in the index value was assessed.
The index value total range is from a minimum value of -1 to a maximum value of +1.
A higher EQ-5D-5L index value represents better quality of life (QoL), thus a positive change in the index value represents improved QoL.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes as Measured Based on the EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ VAS score at baseline and each of the post-HSCT assessments was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics.
A higher EQ VAS score represents better QoL.
For each of the post-HSCT assessments, change between baseline and that assessment in the EQ VAS score was calculated similarly to the EQ-5D-5L index value for a specific participant and was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics.
The score ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100.
A negative change in the score indicates a decrease in quality of life.
|
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Days +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
|
|
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Time Frame: Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed.
For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
|
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- JZP963-201
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute-graft-versus-host Disease
-
Mesoblast, Inc.Quintiles, Inc.CompletedGrade B Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Grade C Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Grade D Acute Graft Versus Host DiseaseUnited States
-
University of LiegeTerminatedChronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease | Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease | Steroid Refractory Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseBelgium
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterWithdrawnAcute Graft Versus Host Disease | Gastrointestinal Tract Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Severe Gastrointestinal Tract Acute Graft Versus Host Disease | Steroid Resistant Gastrointestinal Tract Acute Graft Versus Host DiseaseUnited States
-
AltruBio Inc.CompletedSteroid-refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease | Treatment-refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host DiseaseUnited States
-
Accro Bioscience (Suzhou) LimitedRecruitingAcute Graft-versus-Host DiseaseChina
-
Ruijin HospitalNot yet recruitingAcute Graft-versus-Host Disease
-
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital...Not yet recruitingAcute Graft-versus-host Disease
-
Shenzhen Xbiome Biotech Co., Ltd.Beijing Improve-Quality Tech.Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Cytopeutics Sdn. Bhd.Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanCompletedAcute-graft-versus-host DiseaseMalaysia
-
Incyte CorporationTerminatedAcute Graft-versus-host DiseaseUnited States, Spain, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Germany
Clinical Trials on Defibrotide
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleCompletedPatients With COVID-19 Pneumonia Will Allow to Detect an Absolute Reduction in the Rate of Respiratory-failureItaly
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalJazz PharmaceuticalsRecruiting
-
New York Medical CollegeRecruitingSinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome | Veno-occlusive DiseaseUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Jazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedVeno-occlusive DiseaseUnited States
-
Loyola UniversityRecruitingBone Marrow Transplant Complications | Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome | Veno-occlusive DiseaseUnited States
-
New York Medical CollegeJohns Hopkins University; Baylor College of Medicine; University of California... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSickle Cell DiseaseUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
Emory UniversityNo longer availableDefibrotide Compassionate Use for Patients With Life Threatening Veno-Occlusive Disease of the LiverLiver DiseasesUnited States
-
Gregory YanikJazz PharmaceuticalsCompletedCOVID-19 | COVID | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Sars-CoV2United States
-
Jazz PharmaceuticalsTerminatedNeurotoxicity Syndromes | DLBCLUnited States