MCT and Capsaicin Provocation Challenge in Diagnosis of Chronic Cough

June 8, 2021 updated by: Medical University of Warsaw

The Usefulness of the Methacholine Challenge Test and Capsaicin Inhalation Cough Challenge in a Prediction of Response to Management in Adults With a Chronic Cough.

The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in non-smoking adults with chronic cough and the prevalence of BHR in patients with upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), to evaluate the relationship between BHR and cough reflex sensitivity, to assess the diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge test (MCT) in cough variant asthma (CVA) with special regard to its discriminating cut off value between CVA and other causes of chronic cough, particularly GERD, to estimate prognostic value of BHR, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and induced sputum eosinophil count in predicting response to asthma treatment.

Patients diagnosed with a chronic cough will undergo the standard diagnostic work-up recommended by experts for patients with a chronic cough, including methacholine challenge test (MCT) and an at least 4-week period of causal treatment. Patients with BHR in MCT will be treated with - in first step B2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for at least 4 weeks, if improvement is not significant in next steps with leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) or systemic corticosteroid. A good treatment response, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and cough challenge will confirm the diagnosis of the disease. A statistical analysis will consist of the frequency of BHR in a chronic cough, correlation between the results of MCT and cough reflex sensitivity in capsaicin inhalation test and cut-off point for MCT to discriminate asthma from other causes of a chronic cough.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study has the following objectives:

  1. to assess the prevalence of BHR in non-smoking adults with a chronic cough,
  2. to assess the prevalence of BHR in patients with UACS and GERD,
  3. to evaluate the relationship between BHR and cough reflex sensitivity,
  4. to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MCT in CVA with special regard to its discriminating value between CVA and other causes of a chronic cough, particularly GERD,
  5. to estimate prognostic value of BHR, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and induced sputum eosinophil count in predicting response to asthma treatment.

The investigated group will consist of 80 non-smoking adults (18-75 years old), who are not treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with no signs of respiratory infection within six weeks prior to enrolment, with a normal chest radiograph and who are referred to the hospital due to a cough lasting at least eight weeks.

After obtaining an informed consent, the diagnostic approach of the most common causes of chronic cough will be performed: a medical history, physical examination, chest radiograph, in some cases chest computed tomography, pulmonary function tests (spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, methacholine challenge test), laboratory tests (total immunoglobulin E concentration, complete blood count), skin prick tests, induced sputum cell count, computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses and ENT consultation, 24-hour impedance with pH monitoring, videolaryngoscopy and cough challenge with capsaicin.

The cough severity will be assessed twice (on admission and after six weeks of causal treatment) using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Polish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and the capsaicin inhalation cough challenge.

If MCT result is positive, CVA will be assumed the cause of a chronic cough and treatment with an inhaled steroid combined with a long-acting beta-agonist will be administered for at least 4 weeks. If no satisfactory response to this treatment is observed, an anti-leukotriene agent or in the next step systemic corticosteroid will be applied. Ineffective treatment with the above-mentioned medications will indicate an opportunity for a different underlying cause of BHR. The estimation the area under a ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve will be used to determine the optimal cut-off point for the differentiation between asthma and alternate causes of a chronic cough.

It is expected to assess the frequency of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in subjects with a chronic cough, to confirm a correlation between the results of MCT and the sensitivity of cough reflex measured in capsaicin inhalation cough challenge. The investigation will probably determine a precise cut-off point for MCT which would allow discriminating asthma from other causes of a chronic cough.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mazowieckie
      • Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland, 02-097
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Lung Diseases and Allergy Medical University of Warsaw

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Non-smoking patients aged 18-75, meeting inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults patients aged between 18 and 75;
  2. Chronic cough lasting more than 8 weeks;
  3. Non-smoking (min. 6 months);
  4. Not treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors;
  5. Not treated with:

    1. inhaled corticosteroids or systemic corticosteroids min. 4 weeks before enrolment,
    2. proton pump inhibitors min. 2 weeks before enrolment,
    3. antihistaminic drugs 1 week before enrolment;
  6. With normal chest radiograph or with insignificant changes in cough pathogenesis
  7. Without airway infection in previous 6 weeks.
  8. Patients enrolled with informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients under 18 years old and above 75 years old;
  2. Smokers (actual or ex-smokers shorter than 6 weeks);
  3. Therapy with corticosteroids (inhaled or systemic) for last 4 weeks, proton pump inhibitors for 2 weeks, antihistaminic drug for 1 week before enrolment;
  4. Airway infection 6 weeks preceding enrolment or during study - re-attempt to enroll after 6 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The decrease of a cough after cough variant asthma therapy measured by Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ).
Time Frame: at least 4 weeks of treatment
Increase in quality of life measured with LCQ min. 1.3 points.
at least 4 weeks of treatment
The decrease of a cough after cough variant asthma therapy measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: at least 4 weeks of treatment
Reduction of cough intensity measured by VAS: Reduction min. 20 mm in VAS
at least 4 weeks of treatment
The decrease of a cough after cough variant asthma therapy measured by the cough challenge.
Time Frame: at least 4 weeks of treatment
Increase capsaicin concentration causing causing two/five (C2/C5) cough episode in the cough challenge.
at least 4 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cough

Clinical Trials on Cough variant asthma treatment

Subscribe