Post-market Surveillance Study With the HYPERION Hip Endoprosthesis System in Defect Reconstruction

April 5, 2023 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

Prospective, Multi - Centre Clinical Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the HYPERION Hip Endoprosthesis System in Defect Reconstruction

The study is a multi-center, prospective, non-controlled, consecutive cohort post market surveillance study. The objective of this study is to obtain survival and clinical outcome data on the Hyperion® system in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This multi-center, prospective, non-controlled, consecutive cohort post market surveillance study will serve the purpose of confirming long-term safety and performance of the Hyperion® system. The performance of the Hyperion® THA System will be evaluated using standard scoring systems (Merle d'Aubigné Score, HOOS Score). Safety will be evaluated by adverse event reporting.

The study will be performed at 6 sites, enrolling in total 70 patients. Follow-up visits are planned after 3 to 6 month, 1, 2 and 5 years. The scores will be filled in pre-operatively and post-operatively until 5 years. In order to obtain mid- to long-term patient satisfaction data the patient questionnaire will be send to the patient at 7 and 10 years, additionally. Xrays will be done pre-operatively, immediate post-operatively and at each of the Follow-up visits.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hildesheim, Germany, 31135
        • Helios Klinik Hildesheim
      • Osnabrück, Germany, 49076
        • Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH
      • Schwandorf In Bayern, Germany, 92421
        • Asklepios Orthopädische Klinik Lindenlohe

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Because of the studiesindications it is assumed that patients have a relatively high (> 60 Jahre) age at the time of their operations. Therefore a higher letality and a higher drop-out-rate is expected compared to study populations of primary hip replacement. To reach the necessery power for this clinical study at least 70 patients should be recruited.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age at least 18 years
  • Fully conscious and capable patients
  • Signed informed consent
  • Stationary treatment
  • Merle d'Aubigné < 12 Points, WOMAC Score > 25 Points
  • Patients with at least one of the following indications:

Indications for primary hip replacement:

  • Non-inflammatory diseases of the joints such as osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis (head necrosis)
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Functional deformities
  • Provision of non-endoprosthetic previous operations of the hip joint (e.g., transposition osteotomies)
  • Treatment of pseudarthrosis, femoral neck and trochanter fractures, as well as fractures of the proximal femur affecting the head, which can not be treated by other techniques

Revision THA:

  • Revision of endoprosthesis-treated hips as a result of septic or aseptic loosening, sub- and periprosthetic fractures or material failure (eg fracture of the prosthesis)
  • Bridging of large bone defects (precondition: suitable proximal bone situation for a stable anchorage), i.e. for tumors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infections
  • Patients under 18 years
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Known alcohol abuse (at least 20 g alcohol per day for women and at least 40 g per day for men) or drug abuse
  • Legal incapacity or restricted capacity
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days or planned participation in another clinical trial within the next 3 months
  • Patients who are unable to attend to follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and Walking Ability Determined by a Merle d' Aubigné Score Increase of >4 Points.
Time Frame: baseline/Pre-op and 2 years (+/- 2 months)

Pain and walking ability determined by a Merle d' Aubigné Score (MdA) increase of >4 points compared to the pre-operative score points.

The patients were evaluated by the Merle d'Aubigné hip score, which evaluates pain, gait and mobility, on a scale of 1 to 6 for each item, where 1 indicates the worst and 6, the best state of the patient. The value of each item is summed to a total score. The total minimum score reached is 3, and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

baseline/Pre-op and 2 years (+/- 2 months)
Implant Survival Measured by the Number of Revisions.
Time Frame: 2 years (+/- 2 month)
Implant survival is measured by the number of revisions and analysed by the Kaplan Meier method.
2 years (+/- 2 month)
WOMAC Score Value Decrease at 2-years in Min. 25 Points Compared to the Pre-operative WOMAC Score Value
Time Frame: baseline/Pre-op and 2 years (+/- 2 months)

at 2-years post op, WOMAC score (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) has to be at least 25 points lower compared to preop values

Scale: min 0-Max 100; Higher values mean worse outcome

baseline/Pre-op and 2 years (+/- 2 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

3
Subscribe