Acne Scarring in Skin of Color: Laser vs Microneedling

November 11, 2019 updated by: Boston University

Comparison of Fractionated 1,540nm Nonablative Laser and Microneedling in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scarring in Skin of Color: A Randomized Controlled Study

Atrophic acne scars are a common and important sequelae of acne that affect up to 43-55% of patients with acne. Scarring impacts quality of life with reports of diminished self-esteem and frustration/sadness; additionally, some individuals report that their appearance even interferes with their professional lives. Though many treatments for acne scarring exist including ablative and nonablative lasers, subcision, and peels, none is without risk of adverse effects of pain, post-procedure redness or pigmentary changes. There have been no randomized studies directly comparing the effectiveness and safety profiles of microneedling (Dermapen) to 1,540nm nonablative fractional lasers (Palomar StarLux) in the treatment of atrophic acne scarring in skin of color. This clinical trial aims to determine which treatment modality -- microneedling or nonablative fractional laser -- is safer and more efficacious in the treatment of acne scarring in patients with skin of color.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referred to dermatology clinic for any reason, or resident or attending dermatologists at Boston University.
  • Individuals (men and women) aged 18 and older
  • Patients must have atrophic facial acne scarring on the face and desire treatment to improve appearance of acne scarring
  • Patients must have Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI
  • Patients must be willing to receive five acne scarring treatments at monthly intervals with one follow-up visit to assess for efficacy and adverse effects
  • Subjects must speak either English, Chinese, or Spanish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
  • Personal history of photosensitivity or photosensitive diseases.
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Facial surgical or laser treatment in the last 3 months.
  • Patients with any active skin infection in the treatment area.
  • Coagulopathies or anticoagulant therapy.
  • Personal history or presence of hypertrophic scars or keloids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microneedling
Participants in this arm will receive 5 treatments of microneedling.
The exact microneedling settings will be tailored to each patient based on skin type, photodamage, skin thickness based on area of the face. Settings will be adjusted to deliver similar endpoints among all patients. Each participant will receive 5 treatments a month apart.
Other Names:
  • DermaPen 3MD
Active Comparator: Fractional non-ablative 1,540nm laser
Participants in this arm will receive 5 treatments of fractional non-ablative1,540nm laser.
The exact laser settings will be tailored to each patient based on skin type, photodamage, skin thickness based on area of the face. Settings will be adjusted to deliver similar endpoints among all patients. Each participant will receive 5 treatments a month apart.
Other Names:
  • Palomar StarLux

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Goodman and Baron score
Time Frame: Before treatment starts and 3 months after the last/5th treatment
The Goodman and Baron score considers type of scar, number of scars, and severity of scarring and assigns a grade 1-4 with grade 1 representing mild, macular disease and grade 4 representing severe scarring that is obviously visible at social distances of 50cm, is not easily covered by makeup, and is not able to be flattened by manual stretching of the skin. Lower scores are favorable.
Before treatment starts and 3 months after the last/5th treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months after the last/5th treatment
A questionnaire with questions about participant satisfaction with the treatment, perceived improvement, and perceived adverse effects will be administered at the last visit, 3 months after the treatment is complete. Responses will be compared between the two treatment arms.
3 months after the last/5th treatment
Impact of skin disease on the quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the last/5th treatment
Impact of skin disease on the quality of life will be assessed using the Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI) which is a ten-question questionnaire with responses options of: Very much=3, A lot=2, A little=1, Not at all=0, or Not relevant=0. Range of scores are from 0 to 30 and interpreted as: 0 - 1= no effect at all on patient's life, 2 - 5= small effect on patient's life, 6 - 10= moderate effect on patient's life, 11 - 20= very large effect on patient's life, and 21 - 30= extremely large effect on patient's life. Responses will be compared between the two treatment arms.
3 months after the last/5th treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hye Jin Chung, MD, MMS, Boston University Department of Dermatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Microneedling

Subscribe