Detection of (Sub)Clinical Toxicity in Irradiated vs. Non-irradiated Surgically Treated Esophageal Cancer Patients: a Pilot Study (CROSS SECT) (CROSS SECT)

February 26, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

Rationale: Radiation-induced cardiac and pulmonary toxicity after treatment for intra-thoracic tumors is a clinically relevant problem, which may jeopardize the benefit of (neo-adjuvant) (chemo) radiotherapy. Although cure rates are rising since the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (neo-CRT) as current standard treatment for esophageal cancer (EC), recent studies showed that there is a substantial risk of non-cancer treatment-related death in these patients. Furthermore, this risk is underestimated as the cause of death of many patients remains unknown, since the distinction between tumor related and non-cancer related death can be difficult.

Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity and its interaction as seen in pre-clinical studies might explain for these unknown deaths as suggested in several clinical studies. Clinical imaging studies performed shortly after treatment showed changes in different cardiac function parameters, all related to radiation dose parameters. Systematic imaging studies analysing subclinical toxicities at longer follow up have never been performed, most probably because of poor survival rates. However, identification of the magnitude of (subclinical) cardiopulmonary toxicity, by performing several cardiopulmonary function tests, is essential in this patient group as this toxicity is most likely the cause of the increased mortality after thoracic radiotherapy. For future perspectives, these results can be used to select the best diagnostic methods for a prospective cohort study to develop prediction tools for cardiopulmonary toxicity..

Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine the most suitable diagnostic test to identify cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection. Furthermore, we want to estimate the difference in cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection compared to EC survivors who were treated with surgical resection alone.

Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study

Study population: 40 EC patients who were treated with curative intent by esophageal resection with or without neo-CRT

Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable.

Main study parameters/endpoints: As this is an exploratory pilot study to determine the most suitable diagnostic tests for future studies, there will be several endpoints related to (sub)clinical cardiopulmonary dysfunction.

Signs of myocardial ischemia, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, rhythm and valve disorders, pericardial effusion and fibrosis, myocardial fibrosis, focal wall motion disorders and coronary calcifications will be analyzed. The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Several tests will be performed at one time point, 5-10 years after given treatment. If the findings of the test indicate cardiovascular complications, the patient will be referred to the cardiologist for further analysis and/or preventive measures. As one of the tests, cardiac MRI, including gadolinium (Dotarem 0.2 mmol/kg) enhancement will be performed. Potential side effects of gadolinium include brief headache, nausea (feeling sick) and dizziness for a brief time following the injection. Allergic reactions are rare. Furthermore, a cardiac CT scan will be performed with a total radiation exposure of 0.6 mSv (less than a third of the annual background radiation dose), the risks will be minimal.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with EC treated with or without neo-CRT, alive without evidence of disease, treated between 2000 and 2012 at the University Medical Centre Groningen will be eligible. Twenty patients will be included in both treatment groups. Length of follow up after treatment does not seem to be an important confounding factor as surgery is not considered to be an important risk factor for late toxicity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treated for EC with a curative resection between 2000 and 2012
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • No signs of tumor recurrence or new other malignancies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Thoracic radiotherapy for indications other than EC.
  • Contra indication for cardiac MRI, pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal not compliable with MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
EEG, ECG, CT, MRI
CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with neo-CRT followed by surgical resection will be compared to cardiopulmonary (dys)function in EC survivors treated with surgical resection alone.
Time Frame: cross sectional 5-10 years after treatment
cross sectional 5-10 years after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jannet Beukema, Dr., Radiation Oncologist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Tumor

Clinical Trials on CTTC scan, cardiac MRI, ECG, 6 minute walking test, echocardiogram

3
Subscribe