Cross-Linking ACcéléré Iontophorèse Confocal kératocONE (CLACICONE)

February 12, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Comparison in Confocal Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography of Postoperative Morphological Changes of Keratoconus Treated by Cross-linking of Collagen in Accelerated Procedure and in Iontophoresis Procedure

A monocentric, parallel-arm, prospective, randomized therapeutic trial that compares the efficacy of two curative keratoconus treatment techniques by cross-linking collagen (accelerated conventional technique or iontophoresis). The primary endpoint will be the depth of the demarcation line measured by confocal microscopy and OCT at 1 month. This line represents the limit depth between treated and untreated stroma.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A two-arm, parallel, open-label, prospective, randomized therapeutic trial comparing two management strategies. The goal is to describe and compare, thanks to in vivo confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT), the structural modifications observed postoperatively on evolutive keratoconus treated by cross-linking of collagen in accelerated procedure and iontophoresis. The study will be monocentric and will take place in the ophthalmology department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Patients will be recruited through consultation dedicated to keratoconus (The ophthalmology department of Clermont-Ferrand is one of the 9 French centers of expertise for this pathology). Inclusion will be offered to all patients over 18 years old who meet the scalability criteria and who will benefit from a cross-linking procedure. Blind randomization will be performed between iontophoresis and accelerated procedure. The dates of the visits will be fixed, with a preoperative evaluation, and a follow-up follow-up on 6 months with controls at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Confocal microscopy imaging and OCT will be performed during the preoperative visit and during visits at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Clermont-Ferrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Frédéric CHIAMBARETTA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pachymetry greater than 400μm

Topographic criteria for keratoconus evolution:

Variation over a period of 6 months of the following parameters:

An increase equal to or greater than 1D of maximum keratometry (Kmax) And / or an increase in mean keratometry (Kmean) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or an increase in the difference between the most arched and the least arched meridian (Kmax-Kmin) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or a decrease in corneal central thickness greater than or equal to 2%

Exclusion Criteria:

Ectasies post LASIK Pregnant women breastfeeding Major corneal opacities Absence of consent to participate in the study No affiliation to social security or State Medical Aid (AME) or Universal Medical Coverage (CMU)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: accelerated conventional technique

Pachymetry greater than 400μm

Topographic criteria for keratoconus evolution:

Variation over a 6-month period of the following changes:

An increase equal to or greater than 1D of maximum keratometry (Kmax) And / or an increase in mean keratometry (Kmean) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or an increase in the difference between the meridian and the most arched and the least arched (Kmax-Kmin) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or a decrease in the central thickness greater than or equal to 2% Criteria of non-inclusion Age under 18 Ectasies post LASIK Pregnant women breastfeeding Major corneal opacities Absence of consent to participation in the study No affiliation to Social Security or State Medical Aid (AME) or Universal Medical Coverage (CMU)

Accelerated cross-linking procedure: (Total duration: 40 minutes)
Sham Comparator: iontophoresis

Pachymetry greater than 400μm

Topographic criteria for keratoconus evolution:

Variation over a 6-month period of the following changes:

An increase equal to or greater than 1D of maximum keratometry (Kmax) And / or an increase in mean keratometry (Kmean) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or an increase in the difference between the meridian and the most arched and the least arched (Kmax-Kmin) greater than or equal to 0.75D And / or a decrease in the central thickness greater than or equal to 2% Criteria of non-inclusion Age under 18 Ectasies post LASIK Pregnant women breastfeeding Major corneal opacities Absence of consent to participation in the study No affiliation to Social Security or State Medical Aid (AME) or Universal Medical Coverage (CMU)

Accelerated cross-linking procedure: (Total duration: 40 minutes)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
depth of the demarcation line
Time Frame: at one month
depth of the demarcation line measured by confocal microscopy
at one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederic CHIAMBARETTA, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 12, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHU-369
  • 2015-A00242-47 (Other Identifier: 2015-A00242-47)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratoconus

Clinical Trials on Cross linking

3
Subscribe