- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03477617
Advanced Monitoring to Inform and Guide Perioperative Hemodynamic Optimization 1 (AMIGO-1) Study (AMIGO-1)
September 28, 2020 updated by: Jo Carroll, University Health Network, Toronto
A Single Centre Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Advanced Minimally Invasive Monitoring to Optimize Hemodynamic Management in Major Noncardiac Surgery
Serious complications occur in about 16% of major surgeries.
Episode of hypotension during surgery may be a leading cause of these complications.
Even though hypotension occurs frequently during surgery, choosing the correct treatment remains difficult in clinical practice.
Physicians are often uncertain as to whether low blood pressure should be treated with intravenous fluid or vasoactive drugs.
The first treatment of choice typically involves administering more intravenous fluid; however, excessive fluid administration during surgery has been shown to be deleterious.
New minimally invasive hemodynamic monitors now offer a potential solution by guiding physicians with respect to the choice of appropriate intervention (i.e., fluid versus vasoactive drugs).
The Investigators will conduct a single-center feasibility randomized control trial (RCT) at the Toronto General Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada) of an algorithm to manage hypotension during surgery based on the information captured by a minimally invasive monitor.
Sixty participants who are aged 40 years or older and scheduled to undergo an abdominal, pelvic or vascular surgery will be randomized to have the intraoperative hypotension managed by either the new algorithm (guided by the monitor) or usual care.
Participants will be recruited over 12 to 18 months, and followed for 30 days to describe differences in clinical care, hemodynamics, complications, and death.
The feasibility of a future multicenter RCT will be assessed based on this present study demonstrating that (1) the algorithm can be practically implemented in a clinical setting where hemodynamic monitors are not typically used; (2) initial descriptive data suggest differences in care between groups; (3) there are no obvious major harms from the protocol; and (4) there is an acceptable participation rate among eligible patients.
These data will inform any required changes to the algorithm and protocol to allow for its application in a future study.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥40 years
- Abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic or vascular surgery requiring general anesthesia and planned postoperative stay of ≥48 hours for medical reasons
Elevated perioperative cardiovascular risk based on at least one of the following:
- cardiovascular comorbidities: coronary artery disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease
- elevated age (≥70 y),
- smoker,
- hypertension,
- diabetes mellitus,
- or preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60mL/min/1.73m2
- Planned placement of invasive arterial line for clinical care
Exclusion Criteria:
- Preoperative dialysis dependence
- Minimally invasive procedures (i.e., laparoscopic or endovascular approach)
- Intra-thoracic procedures
- Non-sinus rhythm
- Liver resection surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm
In the experimental group, the anesthesiologist will have complete access to data from the minimal invasive cardiac output monitor.
During the intraoperative period, the anesthesiologist will be instructed to use a hemodynamic management algorithm to manage episodes of significant hypotension
|
Anesthesiologists are instructed to use the study's algorithm to manage intraoperative hypotension in response to the cardiac output monitor values.
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual Hemodynamic Management
In the control arm, the participant will be monitored by the cardiac output monitor, but the anesthesiologists in the operating room will be blinded to hemodynamic data from the monitor.
Data from the monitor will be stored electronically and used to compare hemodynamic parameters between study arms.
|
Anesthesiologists are instructed to manage intraoperative hypotension based on their usual clinical care, without information from cardiac output monitor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Survey score on practicality of study algorithm (Intervention)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
• Practicality of study algorithm will be measured by the survey scores of the anesthesiologists involved in the intraoperative care, assessing several domains using a 5 point Likert scale such as (1) Ease of use, (2) Clinical Utility, (3) Validity
|
2 years
|
|
Participation rate (Feasibility trial pre-RCT)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
• Participation rate: The number of patients consented to the study over the number of eligible patients.
This will help estimate recruitment rates in a future clinical randomized trial.
|
2 years
|
|
Incidence of treatment related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Number of participants with Adverse Events thought to be at least possibly related to the study treatment will be reported.
This outcome will assure that no harm has resulted from the study protocol and the protocol is safe for a future randomized control trial
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Volume of intravenous fluid and volume of blood products (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the study.
Time Frame: During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.
|
• The volume of IV fluid and volume of blood products prescribed by the anesthesiologist will be reported as mean (in mL) separately for each study arm.
Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.
|
During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.
|
|
Dose of vasoactive medication (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the study.
Time Frame: During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.
|
• The dose of vasoactive medications prescribed by the anesthesiologist will be reported as means (in the unit of each vasoactive medication i.e., mg, mcg, etc.) separately for each study arm.
Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.
|
During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.
|
|
Hypotension (blood pressure in mmHg) (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the study
Time Frame: During intra-operative period and up to 72 hours after surgery.
|
• Hypotension is the indication for receiving treatment in the study; therefore, blood pressure will be measured during surgery (every 5 minutes electronically by the non-invasive monitors) and after surgery (every hour by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor) separately for each study arm.
Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.
|
During intra-operative period and up to 72 hours after surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Duminda N Wijeysundera, Dr, Universtiy Health Network. Toronto General Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 3, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
March 26, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 29, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 28, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-9764
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Fluid Management
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompleted
-
Korgün ÖkmenNot yet recruitingIntraoperative Fluid Management
-
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri UniversityCompletedFluid Responsiveness | Intraoperative CareTurkey
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzCompleted
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Completed
-
Université Catholique de LouvainUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel; Vrije Universiteit BrusselCompleted
-
Université Catholique de LouvainMasimo CorporationCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityRecruitingPerioperative Fluid ManagementTurkey
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCheetah Medical Inc.TerminatedHemodynamic Monitoring | Vascular Resistance | Cardiac Event | Fluid Responsiveness | Fluid Management | Inotropy | Perioperative Cardiac Risk | Hemodynamic ManagementUnited States
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalWithdrawnHemodynamic Monitoring | Fluid Management | Goal-Directed Fluid TherapyTurkey
Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm
-
Maria José Clara Colomina SolerCompletedPostoperative Complications | Postoperative Acute Kidney InjurySpain
-
Samsung Medical CenterSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineRecruitingHypotension During SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaActive, not recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRecruitingShock, Septic | Hemodynamic InstabilityFrance
-
University of GiessenEdwards LifesciencesCompletedMyocardial Injury | Renal Failure | Hypotension | Anesthesia | Hemodynamic InstabilityGermany
-
Duzce UniversityRecruitingVitamin D Deficiency | Cesarean Section | Spinal Anesthesia-induced HypotensionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical...Completed
-
Loma Linda UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCoronary Artery Bypass GraftUnited States
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...Withdrawn
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel Aviv Medical CenterCompletedHeart Failure | Kidney InjuryIsrael